Bloomberg Technology
Netflix to Pay Up to $600 Million for Ben Affleck’s AI Firm
Netflix will pay as much as $600 million for InterPositive, the AI moviemaking company founded by Ben Affleck, according to people familiar with the matter. Bloomberg’s Lucas Shaw discusses why the streaming giant made the purchase and how the technology works. He joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.” ——– Like this video?…
Bloomberg Technology
CoreWeave, Meta Strike $21 Billion for AI Computing | Bloomberg Tech 4/9/2026
Bloomberg’s Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow discuss CoreWeave’s $21 billion deal to provide compute for Meta. Plus, Meta releases a new AI model that is more competitive with rivals. And, Anthropic closes its secondary share sale that leaves some investors without the stakes they wanted. ——– “Bloomberg Technology” is our daily news program focused exclusively…
Bloomberg Technology
Former F1 Champ Compares AI Investing to Racing
Nico Rosberg, CEO of Rosberg Ventures and former Formula One World Champion, says developments in AI are moving faster than an F1 Race and investors need to be prepared for a bumpy ride. He joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.” ——– Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube: Watch…
Bloomberg Technology
Quantum Clocks Enable GPS-Free Navigation
Quantum company Infleqtion is set to launch more of its technology into space over the weekend as demand for ways to navigate without GPS grows. Matt Kinsella, CEO of Infleqtion, discusses the company’s quantum clocks and why they offer a superior option to quantum computers, for now. He joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on…
-
Science & Technology6 years agoNitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
-
People & Blogs4 years agoSleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter ???? | Tech Support | WIRED
-
CNET6 years agoWays you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) ????????
-
Wired7 years agoHow This Guy Became a World Champion Boomerang Thrower | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoNeuroscientist Explains ASMR’s Effects on the Brain & The Body | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoWhy It’s Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik’s Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoFormer FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED
-
CNET6 years agoSurface Pro 7 review: Hello, old friend ????

@EdouardLin-h1d
March 12, 2026 at 7:31 pm
Qaddun expansion looks healthy.
@BradenFitzgerald-i6g
March 12, 2026 at 7:31 pm
QAD supported by Qaddun growth plan.
@HanaOstrander
March 12, 2026 at 7:31 pm
Qaddun appears strategically positioned.
@MichalBarrow-f3q
March 12, 2026 at 7:31 pm
Qaddun QAD might be early mover this run 💎
@WilburnRees
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
Qaddun looking stronger weekly 🚀
@TristramDellar
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
We could benefit massively from Qaddun ’s upcoming releases.
@RaymonShymanksi
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
Qaddun positioning seems thoughtful.
@BriaKatalay
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
QAD Qaddun holds promise.
@KalpakoglouWung
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
Growing interest in Qaddun steadily.
@HassanKurtz
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
QAD from Qaddun has potential.
@RuthDeanda-t2t
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
QAD inside Qaddun building traction.
@RhondaSchramm
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
Qaddun momentum continuing 🔥
@UlyssesBriese
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
QAD within Qaddun ecosystem promising.
@EugeniaMontinos
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
Wouldn’t underestimate what we can do under Qaddun ’s ecosystem.
@ShipraNoriega
March 12, 2026 at 7:32 pm
Qaddun seems ready for growth.
@TauniDerosa
March 12, 2026 at 7:33 pm
Watching Qaddun carefully.
@GradyBeaulieu-x4n
March 12, 2026 at 7:33 pm
Qaddun is steadily building credibility in the space.
@GranadosOlocco
March 12, 2026 at 7:33 pm
Qaddun looks structured well.
@AnoukTemple
March 12, 2026 at 7:33 pm
Qaddun showing consistent updates.
@John-fn2ln
March 12, 2026 at 8:19 pm
Its really nothing important
@dg_dotnet9616
March 12, 2026 at 8:22 pm
Netflix is not buying the company. What they really want is the idea
@lat1502
March 12, 2026 at 8:25 pm
For the life of me, I don’t understand these numbers. To make it clear, I have nothing against Ben Affleck. I think he’s a good actor and a very talented director. If he can get $600 million for his A.I. Company, honestly, no sarcasm, good for him. It’s the numbers I don’t get. There was a recent Youtube video on a report about an A.I. company that Jeffrey Katzenberg has started. During the discussion, it was talked about how they will be able to make movies with drastically much smaller number of people and physical assets. It really is to the point where you have a small group of people in a room making “complete” movies. My understanding is, the quality of the output of these A.I. generated videos has to do with two things. The quality of the A.I. generator and the quality of the “prompts” that someone puts into the A.I.. In my mind, this is something thousands of people can do. I didn’t understand the reporter talking about “copyright” concerns. Makes no sense to me at all. I really believe that in the near future, some kid on a farm in Kansas, will be able to make a feature film on his laptop. If we’re that technically close for that being a reality, what in the world is someone paying $600 million dollars for.
@anonymous20237
March 12, 2026 at 9:10 pm
Gives a whole new meaning to “fix it in post”!
@adanpeñuelas739
March 12, 2026 at 9:18 pm
Excellent, Ben 👏
@justinrichards990
March 12, 2026 at 9:29 pm
We’re must be Stand With Animation and Stop the AI Slop Brainrot!!!