Connect with us

Bloomberg Technology

Facebook Might Ban Political Ads Ahead of Election

Jul.10 — Facebook Inc. is considering imposing a ban on political ads on its social network in the days leading up to the U.S. election in November, according to people familiar with the company’s thinking. Kurt Wagner broke the story and reports on “What’d You Miss?”

Published

on

Jul.10 — Facebook Inc. is considering imposing a ban on political ads on its social network in the days leading up to the U.S. election in November, according to people familiar with the company’s thinking. Kurt Wagner broke the story and reports on “What’d You Miss?”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
39 Comments

39 Comments

  1. candhgt light

    July 10, 2020 at 10:23 pm

    Ban all ads .. done

  2. AL- BOT

    July 10, 2020 at 10:25 pm

    The closer it gets to voting, the less it matters.

    Why are people still on Facebook?

  3. The great shakeing

    July 10, 2020 at 10:26 pm

    will they ban all or just the ones from a certain party?

    • Skankhunt36

      July 10, 2020 at 10:43 pm

      All political ads

  4. 2NDARY B18C1

    July 10, 2020 at 10:26 pm

    i forgot what my comment WAS because they DELETED IT…WATCH OUT BLOOMBERG, YOU GONNA HAVE TO FOLLOW FACEBOOK JUST BECAUSE YOU DELETING

    • Skankhunt36

      July 10, 2020 at 10:44 pm

      Your comment was never deleted, loser.

  5. Blow Wrd.

    July 10, 2020 at 10:27 pm

    I PRAY IT DOES .

  6. Charlie Manzani

    July 10, 2020 at 10:31 pm

    More like only block trumps ads these liberal nutjobs

  7. Lee Peacher

    July 10, 2020 at 10:31 pm

    Will they really ban ads from all parties? It’s funny because an ad for Biden played right before the video.

    • William Navarrrete Moreno

      July 10, 2020 at 10:38 pm

      Yes, because YouTube is owned by facebook.????‍♂️????‍♂️

    • Anastasia Schenkel

      July 10, 2020 at 10:47 pm

      And Trump ads run on the others.

  8. Kyle Russell

    July 10, 2020 at 10:31 pm

    Good, politics don’t belong on social media, better yet ban all the covid 19 stuff off as well.

    • iheartdragons126 !!!!

      July 10, 2020 at 11:30 pm

      Agree to disagree on this one. only the current administration has wanted to have health crisis politicized I know you don’t believe it because anything that a government organization even a world one you don’t believe. I will believe the scientist over the government officials thank you very much.

  9. Lee Peacher

    July 10, 2020 at 10:32 pm

    Who the hell is Facebook to decide what we can and cannot see.

    • Skankhunt36

      July 10, 2020 at 10:46 pm

      Well they definitely can tell themselves who can and cannot advertise on their application

  10. Lee Peacher

    July 10, 2020 at 10:33 pm

    I’m sure this is not politically motivated in any way. ????

  11. Shirley Smith

    July 10, 2020 at 10:35 pm

    Good!!!!!

  12. Dr. Gonzo

    July 10, 2020 at 10:36 pm

    Social media is poison.

  13. Ian Reed

    July 10, 2020 at 10:36 pm

    Good! That’s one platform Russia can’t exploit in helping Trump again!????

    • American Dude0520

      July 10, 2020 at 10:42 pm

      Ian reed=????

  14. Kmillz TFT

    July 10, 2020 at 10:37 pm

    How is this even legal? Companies could just decide to do this based on which candidate they feel it gives a larger advantage, huge election interference.

    • Anastasia Schenkel

      July 10, 2020 at 10:46 pm

      If everyone just cuts the shit, it won’t be an issue.

    • Skankhunt36

      July 10, 2020 at 10:47 pm

      Funny how you guys didn’t think it was election interference when the Russians were doing it. Also yeah I’m pretty sure a company could decide which people it allows to advertise on its site.

  15. Deep South

    July 10, 2020 at 10:41 pm

    of course, because you are scared that TRUMP WILL WIN AGAIN……

    • Skankhunt36

      July 10, 2020 at 10:48 pm

      The only person that is scared that Trump will win again is Donald J Trump himself.????????????????????

  16. Hans

    July 10, 2020 at 10:41 pm

    Freedom of speech is now a right wing virtue.

    • Skankhunt36

      July 10, 2020 at 10:46 pm

      You clearly don’t understand the First Amendment.

    • Hans

      July 10, 2020 at 11:06 pm

      @Skankhunt36 educate me

  17. Thomas Chambers

    July 10, 2020 at 10:57 pm

    Good. Tired of hearing it.

  18. President Waldo

    July 10, 2020 at 10:57 pm

    If they did this in 2016 Trump wouldn’t be president right now.

    • Tiny purple fishes Runlaughingthruyourfingers

      July 10, 2020 at 11:12 pm

      Nah , Trump was destined to win. Nothing can stop him now. People prefer reality as opposed to this fictional narrative going on today. This isn’t rocket science it’s a far too predictable an outcome considering today’s irrational and chaotic climate. Only Marxist Anarchy promotes violence not everyday Americans. This Commie wagon is headed over the cliff to be dashed by the rocks below, its careening as we speak.

  19. Jynxie Wavemaiden

    July 10, 2020 at 10:58 pm

    YouTube should ban them too!

  20. Christi Rose

    July 10, 2020 at 11:00 pm

    Only Socialist adds are okay ????

  21. Brooks

    July 10, 2020 at 11:02 pm

    It’s already obvious who’s political ads are gonna be banned cause they’re already taking down trumps ads claiming racism and white supremacy. People who rely on Facebook for their source of news shouldn’t be allowed to vote cause they clearly arent very bright ????

    • Patriots

      July 10, 2020 at 11:18 pm

      The hateful boogeyman
      It’s going to get them all and they will keep being oppressed!

  22. christian cook

    July 10, 2020 at 11:08 pm

    Pull the plug on social media. They have turned away from the people and serve the interest of their politicians and NOT their primary group of customers, THE PEOPLE

  23. missconnection intersection

    July 10, 2020 at 11:10 pm

    Should have been that way for all social media since day 1. If users are given carte blanche to spread false claims campaigns that effect the turnout of elections and political agendas, then that subject matter doesn’t belong on social networking platforms when it’s propaganda dressed up as real news.

  24. Patriots

    July 10, 2020 at 11:16 pm

    What a bunch of cry babies. Block someone if you don’t like what they say

  25. iheartdragons126 !!!!

    July 10, 2020 at 11:24 pm

    Please do. all social media need to ban all political ads. Twitter was the only one that got this right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bloomberg Technology

Crusoe CEO: Data Center Indusry Has a ‘Marketing Issue’

Crusoe CEO Chase Lochmiller discusses the AI infrastructure company’s nearly $4 billion in fresh funding sending its valuation to almost $31 billion. He also discusses how it will fuel the company’s push to build AI infrastructure spanning data centers, cloud computing and managed AI services. He says Crusoe could eventually enter the public markets and…

Published

on

Crusoe CEO Chase Lochmiller discusses the AI infrastructure company’s nearly $4 billion in fresh funding sending its valuation to almost $31 billion. He also discusses how it will fuel the company’s push to build AI infrastructure spanning data centers, cloud computing and managed AI services. He says Crusoe could eventually enter the public markets and pushes back against growing opposition to data centers, arguing the industry has a “marketing issue” and needs to better communicate its impact on water, jobs and local tax revenue. He joins Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.”
——–
Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Tech on YouTube:

 
Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Tech” with Ed Ludlow here:

 
Get the latest in tech from Silicon Valley and around the world here:

Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
 
Follow Ed Ludlow on X here:
 
Listen to the daily Bloomberg Tech podcast here:

 
More from Bloomberg Business
Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
LinkedIn:
TikTok:

Continue Reading

Bloomberg Technology

Former FTC Technologist Warns Against an AI ‘Cartel’

As frontier AI labs seek greater coordination on safety, Neil Chilson, Head of AI Policy at the Abundance Institute and former FTC Chief Technologist, warns that government-backed antitrust exemptions could create a durable “cartel” that ultimately harms competition. He argues companies can collaborate on safety standards without suspending antitrust rules, and that existing consumer-protection and…

Published

on

As frontier AI labs seek greater coordination on safety, Neil Chilson, Head of AI Policy at the Abundance Institute and former FTC Chief Technologist, warns that government-backed antitrust exemptions could create a durable “cartel” that ultimately harms competition. He argues companies can collaborate on safety standards without suspending antitrust rules, and that existing consumer-protection and liability laws already provide tools for addressing harms caused by AI. He joins Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.”
——–
Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Tech on YouTube:

 
Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Tech” with Ed Ludlow here:

 
Get the latest in tech from Silicon Valley and around the world here:

Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
 
Follow Ed Ludlow on X here:
 
Listen to the daily Bloomberg Tech podcast here:

 
More from Bloomberg Business
Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
LinkedIn:
TikTok:

Continue Reading

Bloomberg Technology

Anthropic Investor Franklin: AI Safety Concerns Won’t Slow Spending

Calls to “pace” development at the AI frontier are unlikely to translate into a slowdown in infrastructure spending, according to Sara Araghi, Franklin Templeton Portfolio Manager and Franklin Venture Partner. She argues that even if labs temper some model training, growing inference demand will continue to require enormous amounts of compute. Araghi also discusses why…

Published

on

Calls to “pace” development at the AI frontier are unlikely to translate into a slowdown in infrastructure spending, according to Sara Araghi, Franklin Templeton Portfolio Manager and Franklin Venture Partner. She argues that even if labs temper some model training, growing inference demand will continue to require enormous amounts of compute. Araghi also discusses why heightened AI safety concerns could boost demand for cybersecurity and why she doesn’t expect the debate to derail funding or anticipated AI IPOs. She joins Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.”
——–
Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Tech on YouTube:

 
Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Tech” with Ed Ludlow here:

 
Get the latest in tech from Silicon Valley and around the world here:

Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
 
Follow Ed Ludlow on X here:
 
Listen to the daily Bloomberg Tech podcast here:

 
More from Bloomberg Business
Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
LinkedIn:
TikTok:

Continue Reading

Trending