Connect with us

Entertainment

Aerospace Engineer Answers Airplane Questions From Twitter | Tech Support | WIRED

Professor and department head for the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University Bill Crossley answers questions about airplanes and aerospace engineering from Twitter. How do airplane wings generate the necessary amount of lift to achieve flight? Can a plane fly with only one engine? Could electric airplanes replace fuel-burning ones? Is severe turbulence…

Published

on

Professor and department head for the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University Bill Crossley answers questions about airplanes and aerospace engineering from Twitter. How do airplane wings generate the necessary amount of lift to achieve flight? Can a plane fly with only one engine? Could electric airplanes replace fuel-burning ones? Is severe turbulence still safe to fly through? Why do commercial planes fly at 35,000 feet? Are planes safer than cars statistically? How much does it cost to build an airplane? Answers to these questions and many more await on Airplane Support.

0:00 Airplane Support
0:11 Why fly at an altitude of 35,000 feet?
0:32 737s and 747s and so on
0:57 G-Force
1:43 Airplane vs Automobile safety
2:32 Airplane vs Bird
2:57 How airplane wings generate enough lift to achieve flight
3:13 Can a plane fly with only one engine?
3:51 Commercial aviation improvements
4:44 Just make the airplane out of the blackbox material, duh
5:15 Empty seat etiquette
5:38 Remote control?
6:22 Severe turbulence
6:59 Do planes have an MPG display?
7:31 Could an electric airplane be practical?
8:33 Why plane wings don’t break more often
8:57 Sonic booms
9:48 Supersonic commercial flight
10:26 Ramps! Why didn’t I think of that…
10:56 Parachutes? Would that work?
11:32 Gotta go fast
12:12 A bad way to go
12:34 How much does it cost to build an airplane?
13:07 Hours of maintenance for every flight hour
13:51 Air Traffic Controllers Needed: Apply Within
14:18 Do we need copilots?
14:44 Faves
15:08 How jet engines work

Director: Justin Wolfson
Director of Photography: Ben Dewey
Editor: Shandor Garrison
Expert: William Crossley
Creative Producer: Lisandro Perez-Rey
Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Brandon White
Production Manager: Peter Brunette
Production Coordinator: Rhyan Lark
Casting Producer: Nicholas Sawyer
Camera Operator: Caleb Weiss
Sound Mixer: Rebecca O’Neill
Production Assistant: Sonia Butt
Post Production Supervisor: Christian Olguin
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Additional Editor: Jason Malizia
Assistant Editor: Billy Ward

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
274 Comments

274 Comments

  1. @roypiltdown5083

    September 10, 2024 at 7:01 pm

    bird strikes? when i was in the AF back in the mid 80s, our maintenance magazine showcased a strike in California, where a deer ran onto the runway as an FB-111 was taking off – wrecked the aircraft and (of course) obliterated the deer, but in fairness, the crew chief got to paint a little deer silhouette on the side of the cockpit when the plane returned to service.

  2. @Shmalentine

    September 10, 2024 at 7:04 pm

    How do airplanes fly without flapping their wings? 🤔

    • @martinolssonbass

      September 10, 2024 at 8:07 pm

      They have engines. Gliders have inertia and/or thermals.

  3. @Y20XTongvaLand

    September 10, 2024 at 7:05 pm

    5:28 Homie sneak dissing the weight problem in the U.S.

  4. @bollmocks

    September 10, 2024 at 7:08 pm

    This guy is awesome. Very informative

  5. @samdryden7944

    September 10, 2024 at 7:20 pm

    We don’t want remote controlled commercial planes, because the remote control could be hacked by someone intent on crashing the plane.

  6. @neurve8509

    September 10, 2024 at 7:20 pm

    777 picture at 0:47 is wrong. That’s 100% a 787.

  7. @TwinIonEngines

    September 10, 2024 at 7:43 pm

    Boeing downvoted this video

    • @Jive33

      September 10, 2024 at 8:14 pm

      Haha

  8. @dweeder1453

    September 10, 2024 at 7:46 pm

    Prof. Crossley is an amazing researcher and a teacher. His optimization course is one of the best at Purdue University

  9. @WaltWeaver

    September 10, 2024 at 7:56 pm

    People mentioned the missing 757 in the comments, but WIRED put a photo of a 787 and called it the 777 0:48

  10. @v1__rotate

    September 10, 2024 at 8:02 pm

    He forgot the 757. That’s the airplane that God built

  11. @bomberex7809

    September 10, 2024 at 8:07 pm

    He forgot the 717 (dc-9) and the 757

  12. @Aeroly

    September 10, 2024 at 8:12 pm

    I’m a former aircraft mechanic and I’m still in awe of how aircraft can fly. It all comes down to The Bernoulli Principle.

  13. @ItsMe-fs4df

    September 10, 2024 at 8:12 pm

    These videos keep popping up with things I didn’t know I wanted to know, with exceptional hosts

  14. @Ash-fd5yi

    September 10, 2024 at 8:18 pm

    thanks ill never forget now 15:11

  15. @BINACmini

    September 10, 2024 at 8:22 pm

    I’m sure he knows what he’s saying, but he lost some credibility in my mind when he said “seven seven seven” instead of “triple seven”.

  16. @chazzstorie2981

    September 10, 2024 at 8:22 pm

    There was also the 717 and 757

  17. @bazman32

    September 10, 2024 at 8:34 pm

    Did he just say they have technology to allow them to know where an aeroplane is “at all times” (2.20)? How come you dont know where MH370 is?

  18. @CEH3

    September 10, 2024 at 8:50 pm

    Props for the Connie! Objectively the most beautiful aircraft to have ever existed.🙂 (Dad pun intended!)

  19. @littlerougue

    September 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm

    Good video and Conny is a nice choice.

  20. @user-cc5bi4fv1q

    September 10, 2024 at 9:00 pm

    Positive Gs are holding you in, and negative Gs are pushing you out.

  21. @user-cc5bi4fv1q

    September 10, 2024 at 9:02 pm

    Of course flying is safer, there are 100 million vehicles on the road as opposed to a few thousand planes in the sky. It’s the odds

  22. @ktually

    September 10, 2024 at 9:06 pm

    I’m not on Twitter, but I wish you would answer a question…
    Why don’t more planes have wings mounted on the top of the fuselage? it would seem to prevent engine strikes, and make for a simpler connection with the airplane compared with wings mounted halfway up the fuselage

    • @csantos2

      September 10, 2024 at 9:13 pm

      It’s because they have better aerodynamic efficiency and provide better stability being mounted lower on the fuselage.

  23. @holobolo1661

    September 10, 2024 at 9:07 pm

    He forgot the 757 lol

  24. @user-cc5bi4fv1q

    September 10, 2024 at 9:10 pm

    I think the person who ask why dont airplanes have parachutes meant parachutes for the passengers in case the plane is gonna crash.

  25. @aland7236

    September 10, 2024 at 9:18 pm

    I grew up out in the country during the 90s and can affirm that the high-bypass turbofans being used today are so much more quiet than the oldies. I still see aircraft passing overhead and can only hear them on a very quiet day. I also see contrails that are smaller and go away faster too. When I hear that old roaring sound in the sky 9/10 chance it’s military.

  26. @roycrave2420

    September 11, 2024 at 11:20 am

    Planes nowadays have become unsafe due to DEI hires and Boeing! 🤣

    • @spaceageGecko

      September 11, 2024 at 12:18 pm

      “DEI” has nothing to do with it.

  27. @PasleyAviationPhotography

    September 11, 2024 at 11:28 am

    I was hoping for better. 0:45 Completely skipped my favorite Boeing, the 757. 1:23 4th and 5th generation fighter pilots routinely pull 9+ G’s. 9:47 Google “Boom Supersonic” they are designing and building a new supersonic airliner.

    • @JamesWestMusicMan

      September 11, 2024 at 6:07 pm

      You seem fun at parties

  28. @NykoLUniko

    September 11, 2024 at 11:35 am

    No parachute because of less baggage space. I guess bags are more important than people!

  29. @appa609

    September 11, 2024 at 11:51 am

    Many do have parachutes. My trainer has one.

    • @stoobydootoo4098

      September 11, 2024 at 6:51 pm

      My school girlfriend’s trainer bra had one.

  30. @Ironwill_Games

    September 11, 2024 at 12:08 pm

    Whenever people say what is an engineer is and how smart they are, I’m gonna suggest them this video!

  31. @pssolutede

    September 11, 2024 at 12:38 pm

    10:26 Ramps like some carriers: you wanna start your plane into the wind, so ramp into the wind. The aircraft carrier can turn itself into the wind, so the ramp can always be pointed into the right direction. An airport runway cannot. So it’s useful that the runway can be used in both directions, depending on the wind direction. The ramp would ruin that.

  32. @kenbrown2808

    September 11, 2024 at 1:05 pm

    it is POSSIBLE to fly a modern passenger jet with only one pilot, but the presence of copilot allows the pilot to share his workload with the copilot. in essence, during the complicated parts of the trip; specifically takeoff and landing, the pilot flying does all the things directly related to controlling the airplane, and the pilot monitoring does everything else, like talking on the radio. (and for those who don’t watch aviation youtube, the common terms for what used to be pilot and copilot are pilot flying and pilot monitoring – and the two or three pilots on a plane, depending on the length of the trip, will trade roles during stops on a series of short trips, or at specific points during a long trip)

  33. @kenbrown2808

    September 11, 2024 at 1:08 pm

    cool aviation fact: the DC 3 was submitted for a request for a THREE engine plane that could maintain altitude with one engine out. they produced a two engine plane that could gain altitude with only one engine running.

  34. @fairamir1

    September 11, 2024 at 1:15 pm

    Where do I post a question ?

  35. @zartic4life

    September 11, 2024 at 1:29 pm

    “The chances of having fatal accident in a plane is 1 in 120 million trips unless its Boeing in which case a car driving off a cliff is much safer”

  36. @alastairhewitt380

    September 11, 2024 at 1:42 pm

    You know, I would really love it that even if an airplane only needs 1 engine to fly that they still had 4 engines instead of the super reliable 2… What if both engines failed?

  37. @yunuscurrie3410

    September 11, 2024 at 2:07 pm

    Uses 787 instead of 777 0:46

  38. @MatthijsvanDuin

    September 11, 2024 at 2:21 pm

    1:15 Fun fact: the amount of G-force experienced in a (constant speed) turn is 1/cosine(bank angle), and commercial planes normally never bank more than 30 degrees which translates to only 1.15 G, barely more than the 1G experienced in straight and level flight. Higher G-force than that may be briefly experienced during take-off, landing, or turbulence.

    • @stoobydootoo4098

      September 11, 2024 at 6:35 pm

      And it affects the stall speed (nothing to do with speed, actually). Eg, if a light aircraft’s clean stall speed is 50kts, it will stall at c 70kts in a 60* banked turn with power off if it tries to maintain altitude. Square root of the G load.

  39. @zacherius137

    September 11, 2024 at 4:33 pm

    0:40 homie left out the 757… 😢

  40. @A.J.1656

    September 11, 2024 at 4:34 pm

    The only thing I’d disagree with is the idea that airliners really only need one pilot. It’s not that flying the airplane is hard, it’s just the amount of tasks you have to complete at both ends of the flight.

  41. @forgottenfamily

    September 11, 2024 at 4:37 pm

    One of my favorite stats: every day there’s 100,000 flights worldwide and most days, there’s no crashes.

    You will not drive your car 100,000 times without crashing

  42. @forgottenfamily

    September 11, 2024 at 4:47 pm

    Re: black box material: crashes that are that devastating to the aircraft probably wouldn’t become more survivable if they were made of blackbox material anyways. The force on the plane is great enough to snap a plane in half, why would you assume the passengers would survive just because it didn’t split in half?

  43. @aaastar2267

    September 11, 2024 at 5:00 pm

    Why cant these videos be 1 hr long

  44. @buttcrack7784

    September 11, 2024 at 5:39 pm

    Some airplanes do have parachutes. The Cirrus SR22 for example.

  45. @kotgc7987

    September 11, 2024 at 5:52 pm

    10:57 so profit over safety, what are the costs that break the profit amount?
    Also, cameras inside and outside planes are possible with satellite Internet for blackbox or live relay, adding another safety level.
    E-planes FTW.

  46. @Wargasm54

    September 11, 2024 at 6:13 pm

    Cirrus has a jet with a parachute too 😎

  47. @stoobydootoo4098

    September 11, 2024 at 6:16 pm

    If we know ” .. where the aircraft is at all times ..”, maybe he can tell us where Malaysia Airlines Flight MH 370 is. That’s what I would have said if I were a pedantic adolescent. Fortunately I am not.

  48. @stoobydootoo4098

    September 11, 2024 at 6:47 pm

    I heard a story (apocryphal?) that an old boss of Boeing was asked many years ago why he only flew on 4 engined aircraft. He said, because there are no 5 engined ones.
    Also, I was a young passenger on the old HS Trident aircraft in the 70s a few times. It was reputed to be underpowered even with 3 engines. Pilots used to joke that it didnt actually climb on
    take-off – it just flew straight while planet earth curved away beneath it!

  49. @oliversnow

    September 11, 2024 at 7:22 pm

    There were some seeming omissions here. The 757 was glaring. As was the statement that fighters can pull “up to 6 Gs” which I’m sure makes Viper pilots cringe. But I attribute that more to casual speech and simplification for the sake of the audience more than a lack of knowledge. The audience is Twitter after all.

  50. @musonobari2560

    September 11, 2024 at 9:26 pm

    Did anyone tell RGBSays that no one inside a giant blackbox will survive a crash either?

  51. @AndoVinci

    September 12, 2024 at 11:15 am

    People who always talk about building entire planes out of “the magical material” the blackbox are made of are hilarious af lmao
    Also, this material is just thick steel, nothing special here. There are already vehicles made out of it, like tanks. And guess why they dont fly

  52. @Rusty513

    September 12, 2024 at 11:40 am

    Ummm, He forgot about the Boeing 757…

  53. @ChristmasTurki

    September 12, 2024 at 11:45 am

    What about the 757?

  54. @sanjeever82

    September 12, 2024 at 12:04 pm

    FORGOT THE 757 DUHHHHHHH….plus the 717 🙁

  55. @volofly2011

    September 12, 2024 at 1:14 pm

    Hi Bill! Nicely done… 😉

  56. @rheffner3

    September 12, 2024 at 1:42 pm

    dudh. What a stupid question. Of course they are, by far. Not even close.

  57. @Kittycakes22

    September 12, 2024 at 1:58 pm

    Let’s discuss Boeing tho

  58. @choprjock

    September 12, 2024 at 2:07 pm

    Well done, professor.

  59. @monkofbob

    September 12, 2024 at 2:09 pm

    I’d rather four than two engines

  60. @sleeplessentertainments

    September 12, 2024 at 2:12 pm

    I appreciate your video but some of your answers are Incorrect
    8:04 batteries are not heavier that a fuel powered engine. Weight is not a con. We just need to do more research on the electricity option.
    2:08 Airplanes may have have less accident rate that cars but they also have a lower “survivability” rate. Accident – death ratio is 1000 times that of cars.

  61. @star_wz

    September 12, 2024 at 2:34 pm

    0:45 rip 757😢

  62. @salmansabir4723

    September 12, 2024 at 2:39 pm

    This guy was my professor at Purdue!!! 😃😃😃

  63. @andrewh2341

    September 12, 2024 at 2:55 pm

    WAIT, did this guy just promote Newtonian lift theories???? I call nonsense, if there is any Newtonian lift effects they are insignificant compared to Bernoulli‘s lift theory. (And yes I’m a professor of engineering as well). Also commercial airlines for burn a “few” thousand pounds of fuel for a the trip described. They burn 10’s of thousands of pounds of fuel

    • @spaceageGecko

      September 12, 2024 at 3:38 pm

      Both Newtonian and Bernoulli’s are both correct.

    • @andrewh2341

      September 12, 2024 at 3:43 pm

      @@spaceageGecko you may be neglecting the upwash the proceeds a wing then. A wing doesn’t just make downwash. If you take actual pressure reading around the crossection of an airfoil the integral of that really does add up to near makes no difference the total lift and induced drag effects

  64. @sunalwaysshinesonTVs

    September 12, 2024 at 2:58 pm

    2 follow up questions: 1. is it true wings are affixed to the fuselage by glue? 2. when Maverick flies supersonic, can he hear himself?

    • @spaceageGecko

      September 12, 2024 at 3:37 pm

      Can answer 1. While adhesives are used in building the structure of a lot of aircraft the wings are generally held on by lugs and beams connecting to the main fuselage.

      Wings are generally attached to a structure called the “wing box”.

  65. @dallesamllhals9161

    September 12, 2024 at 3:02 pm

    14:47 +1

  66. @iloveamerica1776

    September 12, 2024 at 3:26 pm

    Fighter pilots even pull up to nine G’s 1:23

  67. @Bers3rk_tv

    September 12, 2024 at 3:28 pm

    @1:54 Boeing enters chat.

  68. @Ascalis1

    September 12, 2024 at 4:06 pm

    Brb. Gonna go tell my wife that we should make like a jet engine.

  69. @12OZK12

    September 12, 2024 at 4:12 pm

    They say there aren’t dumb questions… I beg to differ.

  70. @joseph_b319

    September 12, 2024 at 4:22 pm

    Keep dei out of aviation.

  71. @andykphoto

    September 12, 2024 at 4:25 pm

    15:14 I think that generally describes 4 cycle internal combustion piston engines too. They just do it differently 🤷‍♂️😸👍

  72. @DOC_951

    September 12, 2024 at 5:43 pm

    Weird to say “making the world a smaller place makes it better.” How does that make sense whatsoever?

  73. @davecrupel2817

    September 12, 2024 at 5:59 pm

    0:40
    Bro skipped over the sports model: the 757.
    🙁

  74. @shyamkrishnaswamy

    September 12, 2024 at 7:14 pm

    This guy airplanes

  75. @Shontaku

    September 12, 2024 at 8:21 pm

    The stupidity of these questions is depressing.

  76. @9999AWC

    September 12, 2024 at 11:30 pm

    0:45 he skipped the 757 🙁

  77. @erikkocinare147

    September 13, 2024 at 2:02 am

    Boiler up!

  78. @WS12658

    September 13, 2024 at 6:02 am

    All of these should probably be caveated with “except for Boeing”…

  79. @srinath6247

    September 13, 2024 at 6:05 am

    12:30 That area the professor was talking about is called “Equipment Restraint Area” or shortly termed the “ERA line”. You’re not permitted to cross the line until the engines are turned off and the ACB (Anti Collision Beacon) on the belly of the fuselage stops blinking.

  80. @ABritishGuyAndAFilipina

    September 13, 2024 at 6:20 am

    Very interesting video, this dude knows his stuff.

  81. @jonathanrobison9667

    September 13, 2024 at 8:31 am

    I wonder how much Boeing is paying this guy, or if they released his family yet.

  82. @tomh0304

    September 13, 2024 at 9:46 am

    Dr. Crossley isn’t just a great engineer, he’s also a super down to earth and friendly guy too. He’s been the dean of AAE at Purdue all 4 years I’ve been in the major here. Crazy seeing him on Wired!

  83. @nytehawx

    September 13, 2024 at 11:04 am

    Why are only medical professionals allowed to put a doctor in front of their names and PhD holders (also doctors)? The general public has the same collective intelligence as a gnat.

  84. @John_Smith_86

    September 13, 2024 at 11:44 am

    Note to Self

    Sizing is fairly similar to that by most clothing brands, so no issues there. A bit loose, but that was what I was aiming for. Not a fan of the V-neck as I prefer the round-neck, but seems ok so far.

    The fabric seems quite soft and comfortable, at least before I wash them next. Presumably due to the viscose fabric.

    If there are any wear-and-tear or quality issues with the fabric, I will probably update this review to complain. So far seems ok.

  85. @John_Smith_86

    September 13, 2024 at 11:56 am

    For COIN warfare where you only fight against rebels without an airforce of their own, it is wayyy more logical to have propeller planes outfitted for ground support since they are more efficient and require much less maintainance.

    Your planes are not gonna get attacked by modern weapons anyway, so efficiency is key. That is why some Latin American and Asian countries still have them, leaving aside the poverty factor.

  86. @John_Smith_86

    September 13, 2024 at 11:57 am

    As a mechanical engineer, I approve of this video. 🙂

  87. @jaredknapp8886

    September 13, 2024 at 1:43 pm

    The interview was kind of slow at first but after a few minutes it really took off.

  88. @JFrazer4303

    September 13, 2024 at 1:47 pm

    There was an ATR-72 that could have made use of a BRS that was sized for it.

  89. @beatzbyreefah

    September 13, 2024 at 2:32 pm

    “The airplane has to be certified ”

    Looking at you Boeing….

  90. @williammcdermet6932

    September 13, 2024 at 3:09 pm

    Them Boilermakers got all the answers.

  91. @edsonsilvestre6292

    September 13, 2024 at 3:33 pm

    6:30 what about microbursts?

  92. @roronoboat

    September 13, 2024 at 3:47 pm

    this is 757 erasure

  93. @RealBMK

    September 13, 2024 at 3:55 pm

    Up to 9Gs actually

  94. @Derekzparty

    September 13, 2024 at 4:09 pm

    5:32
    Americans on the left.
    Canadians, Mexicans, Chinese, Egyptians, Australians on the right.
    Everyone else up front!

  95. @Marc-uw4lw

    September 13, 2024 at 4:50 pm

    * not including Boeing

  96. @v3rlon

    September 13, 2024 at 4:59 pm

    Converting to electric: people just don’t appreciate how much energy is in a gallon of gas (or jet fuel). JFK flights consume more energy than the entire state of NY uses electricity PLUS converting 95% of the state into a solar farm. And that assumes the planes with like fuel planes not heavy like batteries AND get lighter as they fly.
    On the bright side, there are several technologies to make batteries more efficient and lighter about 5 years out.
    On the down side, they have been about 5 years out since 1999, and you still have to generate all the electricity somehow.

  97. @deathchips926

    September 13, 2024 at 5:45 pm

    Also, at 35,000ft the air intake to the engines operates more efficiently with cooler air. Less turbulence too.

  98. @largestudent198

    September 13, 2024 at 6:42 pm

    Try building jet engines that have shafts so unreliable and useless and impractical, and I guarantee that at least one of those ideas would spark a new wave of inventions. Don’t thank me. I’m just giving forward something I was given forward.

  99. @rafaelwilks

    September 13, 2024 at 8:02 pm

    0:47 the editor is obviously not an avgeek – since when does a B777 look like that 🤣

  100. @Blacksharq

    September 13, 2024 at 9:00 pm

    10:55 you’re welcome

  101. @simianwarthog

    September 14, 2024 at 5:25 am

    “Our imact on the environment has gone down” That is a complete load of bollox. You mean Each plane has a lower impact. True. But multiply this by the GIGANTIC growth of aviation! MASSIVELY increased impact on the environment.

  102. @Agamemnon2

    September 14, 2024 at 5:33 am

    My favorite airplane fact is that even though you’re not allowed to smoke in an airplane, you can’t take off if the ashtray in the toilet is out of order.

  103. @jeremyb5634

    September 14, 2024 at 6:02 am

    Planes are not safer them cars when you look at Survive ability of crash to death ratio. A plane crashes you are likely dead. Crash a car you will Probably survive

  104. @xetera

    September 14, 2024 at 6:07 am

    I feel like this guy didn’t actually read the question he was answering at 12:08

  105. @ansdfgb

    September 14, 2024 at 10:26 am

    Hi. Bill Cosby

  106. @AgnesEsther-n5r

    September 14, 2024 at 10:40 am

    Lee Michael Perez James Miller Sarah

  107. @joostvisser8537

    September 14, 2024 at 11:05 am

    I’m highly sceptical of remote control on commercial flights. Sure it might make the aircraft safer in some edge cases, but it also makes commercial planes high value targets for hackers employed by terrorist groups.

  108. @asmodeus5326

    September 14, 2024 at 11:06 am

    Fun fact even if the plane was made like the black box the plane would survive you still wont

  109. @SpencerDon-k7k

    September 14, 2024 at 11:43 am

    Hall Donna Robinson David Perez David

  110. @rajvardhanpatil9899

    September 14, 2024 at 1:59 pm

    Can u tell kinematics of plane whose one wing suddenly ripped during cruise ?

  111. @mlooky1221

    September 14, 2024 at 2:52 pm

    1:54
    I have a huge problem with that statement. While yes statistically planes are safer but that doesn’t take into account many factors that make people feel safer in a car than in a plane. In a car you have some control over your fate, by driving safe following good safety practices you will not be a part of the 10s of thousands of fatal annual car accidents. I’ve been driving for over 11 years with not a single serious car accident which is unlikely based on the statistics. They might say that you have a 5% percent chance of getting into a car accident while it’s only 0.01% chance of you are in a plane. But the reaility is that reckless drivers might have 20% chance while safe ones have less than 1% and they are average is high.

    In a plane you have a 0.01% chance of having an accident, but if you have one you have a 0.01% chance of survival.

  112. @elgranpichiricky

    September 14, 2024 at 3:27 pm

    😂😂😂😂 captain Sullivan😂😂😂😂

    • @carlbode666

      September 14, 2024 at 6:18 pm

      Getting off his flight bro join me,…..ffs

  113. @r12e5p

    September 14, 2024 at 3:35 pm

    Another thing to know regarding the need for two pilots is that on take-off and landing, the two pilots will usually split duties, with one responsible for flying the plane and the other responsible for monitoring the flight data and communicating with ATC. It’s also makes it easier and more efficient to deal with emergency situations.

  114. @Mmjk_12

    September 14, 2024 at 3:48 pm

    The “2nd pilot” is NOT a backup… 2 people are needed to fly and task manage multi engine commercial aircraft.

  115. @searob1

    September 14, 2024 at 3:51 pm

    This is so interesting, but I had to look the other way while listening to this video. Wired video editors constantly switched the video zoom back and forth to try to keep brain attention, but it was very distracting for me.

  116. @MajorRenegade

    September 14, 2024 at 5:54 pm

    What about a gas and electric combo plane? They should use the battery till it drain of power and then switch to gas during long flights. Would save a lot of money on gas

  117. @cristianino5435

    September 14, 2024 at 5:57 pm

    Lmao these questions are so stupid props to the guy for answering with composure to all of em

  118. @hu5116

    September 14, 2024 at 7:09 pm

    I don’t care how safe airplanes are, I STILL WANT A PARACHUTE! You can’t just pull off on the side of the airway like you can off the side of a road. Stated another way, a car may fail more often, but I can ALWAYS pull off to the side of the road. But unless the plane is 100% safe (which is impossible), when that one time in a big number happens, you NEED to have a plan B, and without a parachute, there is none.

  119. @6181143919

    September 14, 2024 at 7:18 pm

    I could listen to this gentleman all day and not get bored! Fantastic stuff!

  120. @odyodyodys

    September 14, 2024 at 7:30 pm

    Mid through the video I wanted to throw up. What’s up with this zoom thingy? Those airplane bags can be proven handy viewing this.

  121. @tiaralcu

    September 14, 2024 at 7:49 pm

    alt title: some dumbasses asked questions that they really should know the answer to by now instead of making this video engaging

  122. @renatolp8798

    September 14, 2024 at 8:03 pm

    This Wired series is a true gem, to know things is to be free and happy

  123. @willpickering5829

    September 14, 2024 at 8:18 pm

    Why does the Lockheed constellation say Lufthansa on it?

  124. @rocketsurgeon11

    September 14, 2024 at 8:29 pm

    You forgot the 757! FAIL!

  125. @homburg_media

    September 14, 2024 at 8:47 pm

    There used to be a joke that if you lost an engine (on twin engine aircraft) it would leave you just enough power to fly to the crash site.

  126. @lestuder

    September 16, 2024 at 2:58 pm

    6 g’s? Jeez!

  127. @JetFixxxer

    September 16, 2024 at 3:19 pm

    You forgot the most important question that will Come out of every AMTs mouth. WTF were you thinking!!!

  128. @TomasVonniederhaus-u2d

    September 16, 2024 at 3:50 pm

    Celestine Union

  129. @rambodini

    September 16, 2024 at 4:42 pm

    There are planes with big parachute! i.e. Cirrus Vision Jet!

  130. @lobrow7661

    September 16, 2024 at 4:45 pm

    As an A&P student, that was very cool and helpful.

  131. @amitkotagi6265

    September 16, 2024 at 4:47 pm

    Yes, unless it’s boeing

  132. @Linerunner99

    September 16, 2024 at 4:59 pm

    I love that even a major channel like WIRED rufuses to call it “X”.

  133. @JesseRodgers-d1o

    September 16, 2024 at 5:04 pm

    Hall Kimberly Martinez Melissa Davis Sharon

  134. @lo-firobotboy7112

    September 16, 2024 at 5:11 pm

    Talks Waaaay to fast

  135. @TheBmco99

    September 16, 2024 at 5:29 pm

    Operate one in and out, but for how long they will lose altitude after a while

  136. @audegottoeaudegottoe363

    September 16, 2024 at 5:35 pm

    Have @Wonderful 248th ! / if interested in the future ? Some planes fly backwards ! / / thanks

  137. @dansmith3vdhrj

    September 16, 2024 at 6:22 pm

    These explanations were too short, and the guy comes across as a bit of a d*ck, just saying

  138. @ashwin_mahajan

    September 16, 2024 at 6:23 pm

    Why can’t airplanes be compartmentalized for parachutes?

    We don’t need the cockpit, wings and engines, tail, weels and gears, fuel luggage etc etc. That’s a lot of weight off that we don’t need.

    Divide the seating section into three or four smaller tubes and chute them separately. When humans can drop 50 ton battle tanks off of planes, weight of 30-60 people (plus seats) per section can’t be an issue.

    Obviously not an expert, the design and functionality would be complicated, but it’s worth a try. And I think it’s just the ignorance of the airlines because they wanna profit, and all their investments would go to waste if a plane came out that can 100% guarantee the survival of its passengers and crew in case is a crash.

  139. @Lehmerable

    September 16, 2024 at 6:39 pm

    Boeing 717 has entered the chat

  140. @Daniel-kn9xr

    September 16, 2024 at 6:54 pm

    Laughs in Boing 737 max

  141. @TobiasDominic-s4u

    September 16, 2024 at 7:31 pm

    Hermann Stravenue

  142. @chadkrzmarzick

    September 16, 2024 at 7:41 pm

    Captain Sullivan is my son.

  143. @sciencecompliance235

    September 16, 2024 at 7:44 pm

    I watched this video hoping Wired would get some yahoo who didn’t know what they were talking about, but unfortunately they got someone extremely knowledgeable.

  144. @davidbloxham4876

    September 16, 2024 at 7:54 pm

    The Constellation is a spectacular airplane regardless of age. But as it was used in the 1950s it was a revolution in transportation as well.

  145. @JustWasted3HoursHere

    September 16, 2024 at 8:24 pm

    To add to the fact that airplanes are statistically safer than cars, think about the fact that about 2.9 million people fly EVERY DAY, yet airplane crashes are rare.

  146. @MrKockabilly

    September 16, 2024 at 8:25 pm

    My question is: Why don’t airlines install CCTVs in the passenger and pilot cabins that would stream and save videos to storage centers on the ground. That would be very critical in incident analysis (hijacking, plane crashes, etc.). I believe current technologies would make that very feasible and cheap. For privacy issues, I believe the passenger cabin – with hundreds of passenger – is a public place. Also, saved footage are only for consumption of the airline, used only if there were incidents, and discarded after an ordinary and uneventful flight.

  147. @StaticImage

    September 16, 2024 at 8:30 pm

    Why’d he totally skip the 757? I understand the whole “717” thing, but don’t do the pencil like that.

  148. @MrMathOfficial

    September 16, 2024 at 8:58 pm

    @0:47 yall showed the 787 twice, once for the 777 and another time correctly for the 787. Just pointing it out lol

  149. @NavyDocHM3

    September 16, 2024 at 9:12 pm

    Because it makes too much sense?? 🤷‍♂️

  150. @minakhan-c4m

    September 16, 2024 at 9:19 pm

    Martinez Patricia Clark Kevin Lopez Mary

  151. @JoeyP946

    September 17, 2024 at 6:20 am

    I don’t trust those statistics saying airplanes are safer than cars.
    Are they not completely ignoring what car you have, where you are driving, what time you are driving, the conditions on the road, what idiots you might run into?

  152. @tutacat

    September 17, 2024 at 7:22 am

    The reason we don’t use eupersonic is because we don’t need it. We don’t need the max speed to be nearly that high. It’ really expensive and much more inefficient.

  153. @JcBingham-b2v

    September 17, 2024 at 7:55 am

    Stephon Islands

  154. @samb8076

    September 17, 2024 at 8:44 am

    I had this professor at purdue back in undergrad. Great guy. Amazing professor and yes back then also he talked this fast

  155. @avi310555

    September 17, 2024 at 9:04 am

    He forgot to mention the B757 in his answer about naming convention 0:45

  156. @andybp872

    September 17, 2024 at 9:29 am

    So there is no 717 and 757?

  157. @BrianFendley-o4c

    September 17, 2024 at 11:06 am

    Parisian Creek

  158. @chargedx5768

    September 17, 2024 at 12:20 pm

    why dont you just call it kerosene is my question

  159. @panaceiasuberes6464

    September 17, 2024 at 1:18 pm

    Robert Downey Jr is a Aerospace Engineer?

  160. @frederf3227

    September 17, 2024 at 1:21 pm

    I think the name “G forces” gives the impression that they are somehow special kinds of forces. They aren’t forces at all, but accelerations and simple accelerations at that. The acceleration could be measured in any suitable units. Multiples of g is just a handy single digit scale. Imagine if your trip to the beach was measured in what people call “mile horsepowers” instead of “distance.” First off distance doesn’t have to be miles and horsepower isn’t a measure of distance. But we call them “G forces” despite that that phrasing has the same issues.

  161. @builder1113

    September 17, 2024 at 1:23 pm

    Better question: Why hasn’t general aviation improved in the last 50+ years? It could come down so much in cost if innovation (read not having piston driven aircraft with leaded fuel) was allowed to happen.

  162. @pancake5830

    September 17, 2024 at 1:29 pm

    fighter jets hit a lot more than 6gs lol

  163. @whtlightnn

    September 17, 2024 at 1:31 pm

    NO 757 Love? ; )

  164. @tenrouarc6447

    September 17, 2024 at 2:30 pm

    cant believe no one asked why flightmode is needed on devices

  165. @SteffidelaM

    September 17, 2024 at 3:48 pm

    This guy actually made this actually super interesting!

  166. @DanFrederiksen

    September 17, 2024 at 4:02 pm

    Actually the turbofan engine was invented in the 30s and widely adopted by airliners more than 50 years ago. The incompetent engineering still makes aircraft electronics super heavy for no reason so there has largely been jack improvement in the last 50 years. And he’s equally wrong on parachutes for large planes. It wouldn’t take up too much space or weight, they just don’t want to do it.

  167. @OSVS_Mike

    September 17, 2024 at 4:26 pm

    I had the same exact question about parachutes about 30 years ago.

  168. @markyesh5763

    September 17, 2024 at 4:36 pm

    Not a sinlge comment on the impact of the pilots and the trainning they’ve been put through and that adds to the saftey AND efficiency of flying…..

  169. @derek7105

    September 17, 2024 at 4:56 pm

    Jet engines DO WHAT NOW?

  170. @evennorthug2585

    September 17, 2024 at 5:46 pm

    And why aren’t rockets launched with rubber bands?

  171. @QuentinDolly-m5i

    September 17, 2024 at 5:57 pm

    Goyette Squares

  172. @paula-terrigodet7419

    September 17, 2024 at 6:56 pm

    Doc, you have to address the elephant in the room for my peace of mind please.
    Planes may have gotten safer to fly, but hasn’t greed increased our chances of crashing aka Boeing? How do we trust the manufacturers when they are “in bed” with the regulators?

  173. @jsquire5pa

    September 17, 2024 at 6:57 pm

    This guy is Panglossian ..

  174. @jsquire5pa

    September 17, 2024 at 6:57 pm

    The guy is a ridiculous optimist .. 😂

  175. @mrmuffin5046

    September 17, 2024 at 9:17 pm

    Planes have not improved much of the years because of government regulations. Today planes fly slower to conserve fuel

  176. @mantafare7670

    September 18, 2024 at 4:33 am

    Really enjoyed this video , this guy is full of information

  177. @taz9609

    September 18, 2024 at 6:43 am

    how old are the people asking the questions, 6?

  178. @ShellYoung

    September 18, 2024 at 7:12 am

    nobody cares nerd

  179. @ntznbgzt

    September 18, 2024 at 7:31 am

    at the end of the day its all about money you willing pay for a flight.

  180. @kubel83

    September 18, 2024 at 7:57 am

    I absolutely loved this video. Very informative 😊

  181. @sibusisondaba4354

    September 18, 2024 at 8:10 am

    The problem with remote flight is that it probably needs to be networked. Would be quite a catastrophe if that system was hacked

  182. @jordanoswald6842

    September 18, 2024 at 8:29 am

    Not Twitter, twittered died with the communist agenda coming out of California. X my friend. Elon paid 40B to change the name and remove the commies. Show some respect.

  183. @MilanDuric-v4o

    September 18, 2024 at 9:10 am

    The engineer in the video is clearly not aware of Boeing safety practices when it comes to cutting corner during manufacturing.

  184. @NGC-7635

    September 18, 2024 at 9:11 am

    If you don’t beleive airplanes can fly with wings, go weld a big piece of sheet metal above your truck at a slight angle and then drive it in a hurricane. You will have a flying truck in no time.

  185. @zuhayrdalwai1107

    September 18, 2024 at 9:27 am

    Any other avgeeks notice they put a 787 picture when the 777 was mentioned? 👀

  186. @edoardodepiccoli3004

    September 18, 2024 at 11:48 am

    imagine a hacker taking control of your remote controlled plane, lmao

  187. @esanchezmessina

    September 18, 2024 at 2:06 pm

    This guy is awesome. 👏👏👏

  188. @robertw.anderson6102

    September 18, 2024 at 2:48 pm

    Why did you leave out the must loved (by pilots) Boeing 757?

  189. @raduandreimatei6863

    September 18, 2024 at 3:34 pm

    I feel like the weight distribution thing is bs. How can they distribute the passanger weight if they don’t know it?

  190. @PabLow-zx6mr

    September 18, 2024 at 3:54 pm

    11:34-not true, I once seen Tom Cruise fly Mach 10

  191. @enginerikli5895

    September 18, 2024 at 3:57 pm

    16 minutes?! I bet he basically says “too heavy”.

  192. @Veronicat-of4nz

    September 18, 2024 at 4:55 pm

    They have just not thought installing parachutes but after that question went viral they start to install them ASAP.

  193. @MrBeeastFan

    September 18, 2024 at 4:57 pm

    Why dont they just have small parachutes….?

    • @ThunderFarter

      September 18, 2024 at 5:13 pm

      Maybe watch the video?

  194. @HG-el7of

    September 18, 2024 at 5:04 pm

    making plane out of blackbox question is interesting. the plane may survive but the passengers will still feel the impact

  195. @DrStrange_177A

    September 18, 2024 at 5:11 pm

    Could listen to this guy talk all day 😅

  196. @thomascool1335

    September 18, 2024 at 7:33 pm

    why 101ml considered hazardous while 100ml isn’t?

  197. @midnightwatchman1

    September 18, 2024 at 7:54 pm

    could not get past the mac machine real engineers do not use mac. apple are for babies

  198. @T997S

    September 18, 2024 at 8:09 pm

    He missed the 717 and 757.

  199. @user-fe7bo5mm1o

    September 18, 2024 at 8:14 pm

    some do

  200. @superskullmaster

    September 18, 2024 at 8:16 pm

    If a fighter pilot passes out at only 6 g’s then they shouldn’t be a fighter pilot

  201. @ChurchillVeronica-j2q

    September 19, 2024 at 12:15 am

    Treutel Skyway

  202. @chipmunkjohn

    September 19, 2024 at 12:57 am

    This guy is great at answering questions this is one of the best Tech Supports 🤌

  203. @cadetsparklez3300

    September 19, 2024 at 1:33 am

    these videos would be way shorter if they removed questions that are common knowledge or have easy search results

  204. @butstough

    September 19, 2024 at 1:44 am

    aerospace engineer leaving out the 757 while “counting” boeing plane models is diabolical. makes me question if hes a real engineer

  205. @octagonocologist

    September 19, 2024 at 2:00 am

    1 every couple of years is a lie. We still have dozens of fatal plane crashes every year.

  206. @marvingil1648

    September 19, 2024 at 6:14 am

    professor CROSSLEY can you explain to me what’s going on with Boeing?

    • @oniontime

      September 19, 2024 at 11:03 am

      He could, but then they would murder him.

  207. @ayod0011

    September 19, 2024 at 6:36 am

    Bro, you really think you guys can slip in a photo of a 787 and call it a 777 and think us av geeks won’t notice?😂

  208. @LunnarisLP

    September 19, 2024 at 8:06 am

    The question is just super stupid. Its like asking why we dont put tecpro barriers used in F1 on every of our street to prevent casualties. Well because it is really an unproportional amount of investment for the added safety.
    Lets not forget that most incidents with planes that actually end with a lot of casualties happen on the ground anyway.

  209. @pjkr123

    September 19, 2024 at 10:15 am

    I actually uses some of his answers (despite my background is automotive) as a part of my cover letters to apply jobs in aerospace industry. Wish me luck! XD

  210. @stitchius

    September 19, 2024 at 10:31 am

    Big parachutes, no. But big airbags underneath, to help landing in rough conditions of even water?

  211. @onlyfacts3178

    September 19, 2024 at 10:45 am

    i wouldnt mind changing my luggage space in the bulk for a parachute

  212. @Atom.X

    September 19, 2024 at 11:39 am

    Anish giri on holiday?

  213. @johann_reimann_2077

    September 19, 2024 at 11:42 am

    Wow, I didn’t know that I was working on same theory as jet engines.

  214. @xvy333

    September 19, 2024 at 1:38 pm

    He is saying stealth aircrats’ is a scam/ joke

  215. @allstaken

    September 19, 2024 at 1:44 pm

    U jnow he is a genius 👏

  216. @tomaselke3670

    September 19, 2024 at 2:21 pm

    Can you fix it so that the people who get on the plane before me don’t put their luggage in the luggage rack above my seat?
    Thanks.

  217. @Lexyvil

    September 19, 2024 at 2:23 pm

    As a computer systems engineering student, I aspire to be like this man who can convey information better than internet articles can.

  218. @joelcruz2171

    September 19, 2024 at 2:46 pm

    I was expecting an answer or question about parachutes along the lines of, why don’t airplanes have parachutes? Not a parachute for the airplane itself but for the passengers, kind of like lifejackets on a boat

    • @Meepie_Playz

      September 19, 2024 at 5:52 pm

      Me too lol

  219. @iamindysingh

    September 19, 2024 at 2:47 pm

    I thought Bill Crosby was doing time?!

  220. @Pouncer9000

    September 19, 2024 at 3:06 pm

    0:54 757 sobbing silently

  221. @georgemetaxas9227

    September 19, 2024 at 4:13 pm

    Very good and useful presentation. A small remarque: There is also a small helicopter equipped with a ballistic parachute.

  222. @LaurieFobbs

    September 19, 2024 at 6:28 pm

    Miller Maria Brown Matthew Taylor Angela

  223. @CFUSA

    September 19, 2024 at 8:39 pm

    Professor Crossley taught me how to tie my shoes!!

  224. @amirhamza7610

    September 29, 2024 at 5:06 pm

    Batteries are heavy than that fuel in the plane??

  225. @stevegrim9662

    September 29, 2024 at 5:41 pm

    “Ingested a bunch of geese” lmao

  226. @ft_ph

    September 29, 2024 at 7:14 pm

    Wow he’s able to explain things in a much simpler way. He’s a great teacher!

  227. @tomasemilio

    September 29, 2024 at 8:16 pm

    So good.

  228. @S.I.M.P.L.E.T.O.N

    September 29, 2024 at 8:17 pm

    Skip to to 10:55 if you just want to know what they don’t have parachutes

  229. @ogshotglass9291

    September 30, 2024 at 1:53 am

    4:24 – I want to add something to this, as my grandpa on my Mom’s side was a GE jet mechanic. Some of the improvements in airplanes when it comes to engines is that engineers intentionally design new, more powerful, more reliable engines that can be retrofitted into older engine housings. That’s partly because some airplanes end up continuing to fly 20, 30, even 40 years after they left the shop, and it would be too impractical and far too expensive to make a new airplane model with just a new engine every year like you would a car.

  230. @chippyjohn1

    September 30, 2024 at 6:04 am

    Makes me think only children use twitter and they have no access to any other sources of knowledge.

  231. @AGTC009

    September 30, 2024 at 8:19 am

    I don’t care if & when any autonomous passenger aircraft come along I won’t be getting on one ! Pilots are there for a reason !

  232. @andyjunior

    September 30, 2024 at 12:50 pm

    this guy oozes competence

  233. @TheEric1203

    September 30, 2024 at 1:26 pm

    All that knowledge of aviation, and he still used the term “tarmac” 😭

  234. @FoxtrotYankeeHotel

    October 1, 2024 at 12:09 am

    The Phillip Schofield look is not a good look btw…

  235. @amosioanchiriac7513

    October 1, 2024 at 2:33 am

    Wow. The smartness with this dude, hurts my brain

  236. @imacg5

    October 1, 2024 at 3:50 am

    2:05 This description reminds me of buses, so I did a simple google search. Turns out they’re probably the safest way of transportation. So yes, it’s just driving your personal cars is dangerous.

  237. @dotexe4981

    October 1, 2024 at 6:36 am

    It’s a bit of a flawed logic to say airplanes are safer because the pilots are well trained etc. If you look purely at the vehicles and make a comparion between cars and airplanes for example, I think airplanes are a far more risky means of travel.

  238. @MANITCHOUDHARY-r4o

    October 1, 2024 at 8:13 am

    Aerospace engineering is cool

  239. @BoxingYT-kw2gb

    October 1, 2024 at 5:39 pm

    Guy knows his stuff. Would have liksd him as my school science teacher back in the day.

  240. @blablablablablablablablablbla

    October 2, 2024 at 1:47 am

    Wasn’t it 1 in 12 million trips? Not 1 in 120 million?

  241. @sydneyhoward4890

    October 2, 2024 at 12:06 pm

    Wilson Sarah Martinez Shirley Martin Susan

  242. @david4360

    October 2, 2024 at 12:21 pm

    What about Boeing and their doors etc etc ?

  243. @Guitar387

    October 2, 2024 at 1:22 pm

    I still don’t get why the plane does not get to the destination faster if it is travelling in a direction where the earth is spinning in the opposite direction of the aircraft. Indeed, it makes sense that if the planet is moving in the opposite direction of the plane’ surely the plane would get there quicker.

  244. @ElysiumCreator

    October 2, 2024 at 2:01 pm

    0:41 This 717 and 757 slander will not stand

  245. @mammamiia08

    October 2, 2024 at 2:07 pm

    Many parts in the engines actually have life limit cycles, 25.000 for example. If the part have done 25.000 cycles it can’t be used anymore, no matter how good it might look like.

  246. @Mo_Hamd72

    October 2, 2024 at 6:25 pm

    Please tell us why Boeing planes losing tires, doors, nuts, bolts while flying.

  247. @Missmiapie

    October 2, 2024 at 6:51 pm

    Brought to you by Boeing

  248. @terryantler

    October 2, 2024 at 7:50 pm

    There’s a 757 too….

  249. @adamheeley285

    October 2, 2024 at 9:48 pm

    Wow, if I buy a small plane I want to make sure it has a parachute. I didnt know that was a thing…I thought only the ejector seats had parachutes….I feel smarter.

  250. @dicedaniel7502

    October 2, 2024 at 10:27 pm

    Pls there shouldn’t be an remotely controlled commercial airline to create some sense of seriousness, thanks

  251. @infrequentflyer4271

    October 2, 2024 at 11:02 pm

    2:30 <

  252. @rodneychia2367

    October 3, 2024 at 6:08 am

    Funny he didnt mention the missing malaysian plane and the one in brazil

  253. @lawrencecatolos1853

    October 3, 2024 at 12:35 pm

    This video really helped me about Aviation and Aeronautical Engineering even more. Currently doing my Masters Research about Aeronatical Engineering. Thank you for the informations it really helped.

  254. @T-rock_chr0n1c

    October 3, 2024 at 11:52 pm

    Ingested the birds into engine lol yummy

  255. @danielz000

    October 4, 2024 at 6:37 am

    One every couple of years

    *Boeing has entered the chat*

  256. @tulpamedia

    October 4, 2024 at 9:23 am

    I love the 787. I think that its a great step in commercial aviation. I hope that future aircrafts start using more composites!

  257. @michelbrand1470

    October 4, 2024 at 3:59 pm

    11:50 what a non-answer. 🙁

  258. @hloxyman9346

    October 4, 2024 at 5:30 pm

    With Airbus, the higher the number of the model, the bigger the plane.

  259. @r0ky_M

    October 4, 2024 at 7:54 pm

    2:45 Aero engineer using the term “miracle”..❓

  260. @IdowuEsther

    October 4, 2024 at 8:05 pm

    .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Andrew Garfield & Florence Pugh Answer The Web’s Most Searched Questions | WIRED

Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh, stars of the film “We Live In Time,” visit WIRED to answer their most searched for questions on Google. Will Andrew Garfield play Spider-Man again? Where is Florence Pugh’s accent from? Are Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire friends? Is Florence Pugh going to be in another Marvel movie? Andrew Garfield…

Published

on

Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh, stars of the film “We Live In Time,” visit WIRED to answer their most searched for questions on Google. Will Andrew Garfield play Spider-Man again? Where is Florence Pugh’s accent from? Are Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire friends? Is Florence Pugh going to be in another Marvel movie? Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh answer these questions and plenty more on the WIRED Autocomplete Interview.

WE LIVE IN TIME opens in NY/LA on October 11, and everywhere October 18

Director: Adam Lance Garcia
Director of Photography: Dave Sanders
Editor: Cory Stevens
Talent: Andrew Garfield; Florence Pugh
Creative Producer: Justin Wolfson
Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Paul Gulyas
Production Manager: Peter Brunette
Production Coordinator: Rhyan Lark
Talent Booker: Lauren Mendoza
Camera Operator: Nigel Akam
Gaffer: Dave Plank
Sound Mixer: Kevin Teixeira
Production Assistant: Nicole Murphy
Post Production Supervisor: Christian Olguin
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Assistant Editor: Billy Ward

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Alfonso Cuarón Examines The Language of Cinema & Television | The Big Interview | WIRED

‘Gravity,’ ‘Children of Men,’ the best ‘Harry Potter’ movie—and now a seven-part miniseries? With ‘Disclaimer,’ director Alfonso Cuarón has set out to conquer TV in the name of cinema. The Academy Award-winning director joins WIRED writer Samanth Subramanian to talk about the language of cinema and television—and how they intersect. See more: Still haven’t subscribed…

Published

on

‘Gravity,’ ‘Children of Men,’ the best ‘Harry Potter’ movie—and now a seven-part miniseries? With ‘Disclaimer,’ director Alfonso Cuarón has set out to conquer TV in the name of cinema. The Academy Award-winning director joins WIRED writer Samanth Subramanian to talk about the language of cinema and television—and how they intersect.

See more:

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

What’s Next for Immersive Storytelling? | Mark Grimmer | TED

“New possibilities for storytelling are emerging faster than at any other time in history,” says film producer Mark Grimmer. With an immersive approach to art exhibitions, he shares several multidisciplinary projects — including a kaleidoscopic exhibit of David Bowie’s world-changing career and a luminous, interactive show that brings visitors inside the paintings of David Hockney…

Published

on

“New possibilities for storytelling are emerging faster than at any other time in history,” says film producer Mark Grimmer. With an immersive approach to art exhibitions, he shares several multidisciplinary projects — including a kaleidoscopic exhibit of David Bowie’s world-changing career and a luminous, interactive show that brings visitors inside the paintings of David Hockney — and shows what’s possible when ideas collide. (Recorded at TED2024 on April 19, 2024)

If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas:

Follow TED!
X:
Instagram:
Facebook:
LinkedIn:
TikTok:

The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world’s leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.

Watch more:

TED’s videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: . For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at

#TED #TEDTalks #art

Continue Reading

Trending