Connect with us

Science & Technology

How to Power the World 24/7 — Without Oil | Cindy Taff | TED

Deep beneath the Earth sits 50,000 times more energy than all the world’s fossil fuel reserves, but accessing it requires using the same controversial technology that oil companies spent trillions to develop: fracking. Cindy Taff left Shell to prove that drilling for geothermal heat instead of hydrocarbons can deliver what solar, wind and fossil fuels…

Published

on

Deep beneath the Earth sits 50,000 times more energy than all the world’s fossil fuel reserves, but accessing it requires using the same controversial technology that oil companies spent trillions to develop: fracking. Cindy Taff left Shell to prove that drilling for geothermal heat instead of hydrocarbons can deliver what solar, wind and fossil fuels can’t — clean, renewable power at all times, regardless of weather. Could this be the breakthrough that finally solves our energy challenges? (Recorded at TED Countdown Summit 2025 on June 18, 2025)

Join us in person at a TED conference:
Become a TED Member to support our mission:
Subscribe to a TED newsletter:

Follow TED!
X:
Instagram:
Facebook:
LinkedIn:
TikTok:

The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world’s leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.

Watch more:

TED’s videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: . For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at

#TED #TEDTalks #Sustainability

Continue Reading
Advertisement
91 Comments

91 Comments

  1. @weareparamore1597

    February 24, 2026 at 3:33 pm

    TED allowing greenwashing, thats why were un COP28 something and still nothing on climate change

  2. @jjamespacbell

    February 24, 2026 at 3:39 pm

    I wish she had included the most important piece of data, how does Thermal compare with Solar/Wind/Batteries when it comes to the levelized total cost?

    • @markreed9853

      February 24, 2026 at 5:30 pm

      The global weighted-average levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for new geothermal power projects is approximately USD 0.060/kWh (or $60/MWh) as of 2024–2025. While initial costs are high, geothermal remains competitive with fossil fuels and provides consistent, baseload renewable energy. Costs can range from $0.033/kWh in ideal locations to over $100/MWh in less favorable areas. As of early 2026, the global benchmark Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) is approximately $39/MWh for fixed-axis solar and $40/MWh for onshore wind, making them the lowest-cost sources of new generation. Offshore wind costs are higher, around $100/MWh, while solar is projected to fall another 30% by 2035

    • @ozgoodphotos

      February 24, 2026 at 6:03 pm

      @markreed9853 Why did Germany abandon (for the most part) their green energy programs?

    • @Jasonxbr

      February 24, 2026 at 6:11 pm

      Thermal has a expensive startup cost and big oil and gas dont like that. 😒

    • @gasdive

      February 24, 2026 at 7:30 pm

      ​@ozgoodphotos politics

    • @Vegan_Photographs

      February 24, 2026 at 7:49 pm

      @ozg@ozgoodphotosht wing politicians…. Go and read the Epstein files and look at the part where they discuss taking over Europe for power and money… do you think this was an isolated email… no… these rich people look after themselves and in the last 5-10 years right wing politicians, media and propaganda have really done their part

      The fact we have to argue this, despite all the evidence of how utterly bad oil is is absolutely disgusting

      Oil and gas control international prices of all energy more or less… it’s shocking

      We allow it to continue, we allow lies to continue and we call this democracy..

  3. @saammahakala

    February 24, 2026 at 3:40 pm

    Stationary bikes/wheels hooked up to the grid???
    Human power!

    • @NackDSP

      February 24, 2026 at 6:18 pm

      My stupid stationary bike uses power from the wall outlet. Imagine if it had a generator in there rather than a friction motor it could power this computer as I’m using it.

  4. @stormymangham5518

    February 24, 2026 at 3:41 pm

    Solar thermal concentration via parabolics, sintered heat piping for thermal management and highly insulated graphite-ceramic bricks for solid state battery storage…

    Whatever plans proliferate, carbon net negative should remain priority 1.

    • @Tanbody5

      February 24, 2026 at 4:46 pm

      I’m all for net negative carbon, I, like you, don’t want plants to grow.

    • @cre8tvedge

      February 24, 2026 at 7:45 pm

      @Tanbody5 You’re not so well educated I see. Please go find a chart showing the increase in carbon since the start of the industrial revolution. Note very clearly the rapid increase in the growth of carbon over the last two decades. As you look bear in mind that humans and plants existed on the planet for eons in one case and a couple million years in the other. Carbon will not be a problem with the removal of fossil fuels. In fact it’s estimated it will take a millennium for the excess to work itself a away.

  5. @ozgoodphotos

    February 24, 2026 at 3:51 pm

    I’ll believe it when I see it.

    • @wonthepeople

      February 24, 2026 at 4:04 pm

      We have one of these bores in our town we put in about 8 years ago to heat the town pool it’s a great power saving for the local council/ ratepayers I drive past the bore a couple of times a month it’s a well head in a yard 20foot by 20foot it’s pretty great ✌️ convincing the town to do it with power would be great ✌️🇦🇺

    • @ozgoodphotos

      February 24, 2026 at 6:00 pm

      @wonthepeopleThere seems to be quite a difference in heating a swimming pool and providing power to an entire region or country.

  6. @wonthepeople

    February 24, 2026 at 4:05 pm

    Australia have a geothermal well heating a pool reducing the cost

  7. @gorgonbert

    February 24, 2026 at 4:14 pm

    They tried exactly this technology near Basel, Switzerland… caused earthquakes and the project had to be cancelled in 2010… it’s never as easy as they tell you 🤷‍♂️ unfortunately

  8. @gorgonbert

    February 24, 2026 at 4:19 pm

    This is really old news… this technology has been around for decades… it’s not as easy as she portrays it… please google “Deep Heat Mining Basel” for the challenges this supposed silver bullet technology has…

  9. @igorbukovy4313

    February 24, 2026 at 4:52 pm

    Do we know if extracting heat can have negative impact on the core or maybe something else?

    • @markreed9853

      February 24, 2026 at 5:32 pm

      It has no effect on our core, the energy we could extract is nothing

    • @ginoliessens3024

      February 24, 2026 at 5:41 pm

      That’s what I was thinking as well. Maybe a great idea for some years but on the long term you will be draining energy of the spinning inner core in the liquid outer core and that could result in in a faster slowing down of the spinning inner core and therefor a weaker magnetic field with all consequences that come along with that (look at Mars). Probably it will take a very long time but you never know. Look at climate change how fast that could trigger something catastrophic since the beginning of the industrial revolution.

    • @OgarnijmytoRazem

      February 24, 2026 at 6:36 pm

      @ginoliessens3024 Those wells are few kilometers deep. Our planet’s radius is 6500 kilometers. We’re barely scratching the surface of our planet.

  10. @3184Patrick

    February 24, 2026 at 4:58 pm

    too bad fracking is so bad for our water aquafers etc…

  11. @robviscount1013

    February 24, 2026 at 5:09 pm

    When are we going to finally face the fact of “the more ways we create to make more energy , the more energy we consume” green or dirty it doesn’t matter

    • @beyondfossil

      February 24, 2026 at 5:42 pm

      Point taken. But, firstly, it _does_ matter that the energy is clean, not dirty.

      Secondly, renewables, powered by the fusion energy of our sun (173,000-terawatts peak), provide many orders of magnitude more energy headroom, and much at lower prices. This level of power reaches a Kardashev Type-1 civilization, which we aren’t even close to yet.

      For reference, 173,000-terawatts can provide the world’s annual primary energy consumption of 620-exajoules (EJ) in just under 1 hour!

  12. @gambit633

    February 24, 2026 at 5:19 pm

    I’m glad she mentioned preventing earthquakes… they would be my first worry especially if this becomes popular worldwide.
    Earthquakes (from oil fracking)…. “The largest earthquake induced by fluid injection that has been documented in the scientific literature was a magnitude 5.8 Four magnitude 5+ earthquakes were reported.. in Oklahoma. A magnitude 5.3 earthquake… in Colorado.”

    While Solar + batteries + wind look like they are here to stay, taking over quickly in many countries. BUT I think maintaining some geothermal it an important safety measure for rare events like the “Year Without a Summer” (1819 volcano) or extreme meteor hits that would hide the sun and destabilize weather (assuming meteor diversion efforts by us not successful) .

    FYI Existing claims vary a lot, but one source mentioned 54% of electricity within Europe in 2025 was generated from renewables. With many new projects in the building stages… aiming for 70% within 4 years (2030).

  13. @tubularG

    February 24, 2026 at 5:24 pm

    Hmm. No mention of current challenges to geothermal and expectations of overcoming such challenges. If there aren’t any challenges why is it taking so long to deploy? I suspect there are some things that haven’t been said in this presentation.

    • @MysteriousSoulreaper

      February 24, 2026 at 7:44 pm

      Well most areas aren’t actually generating a sufficient amount of heat to turn steam Turbines. So at most you can run heat exchangers.

  14. @jimmeryman4332

    February 24, 2026 at 5:41 pm

    I’m not a geologist…this maybe a stupid question (but I see something like it mentioned in earlier comments): Unintended Consequences…our Planet has survived with all this heat deep in the ground…what happens under the crust if we suck out all that heat? I suppose nothing if done on a small scale, but this huge. planet wide scale?)……also, what would it mean to the already too warm atmosphere if all this heat from inner Earth were brought to the top?…

    • @CarFreeSegnitz

      February 24, 2026 at 6:21 pm

      Current geothermal, natural geothermal, brings roughly 44 TWh to the surface each year. It’s mostly concentrated at plate boundaries and volcanoes. But there’s a very small amount warming the surface everywhere. Compare that to the energy the sun dumps on Earth… about 175,000 TWh.

      If we get aggressive with geothermal Earth will lose surface water to cooler subsurface rocks. Earth has surface water mostly because water was cooked out of the mantle. We’d have to switch entirely to geothermal for all our energy for hundreds of thousands of years for there to be a noticeable effect on our oceans. And the effect would reverse if we went cold-turkey off geothermal energy due to radioactive decay inside the Earth.

  15. @javelinsilk

    February 24, 2026 at 6:09 pm

    How does laser derived shafts compare to these “fracking shafts?” I don’t think we even need to use fracking technology as laser “drilling” can get deep enough.

  16. @elvingerardoromerotorres3541

    February 24, 2026 at 6:13 pm

    This video is wonderful for me because I need to watch more and more about this video 🎉🎉

  17. @NackDSP

    February 24, 2026 at 6:15 pm

    It doesn’t rain everyday, yet water magically comes out of your faucet whenever you want it. So storage and geothermal are the obvious answers.

  18. @unxusr

    February 24, 2026 at 6:34 pm

    Remove massive subsidies for fossil fuels. All our efforts now should go to removing ALL subsidies from energy sector. And all those great renewable projects will start coming up and developing like mushrooms after the rain.

  19. @elinys2843

    February 24, 2026 at 7:02 pm

    I’m ok with your proposition, but please keep it close loop. No fracking.

  20. @peterweller8583

    February 24, 2026 at 7:22 pm

    Ewe, oil tech for the win!

  21. @John-pf2un

    February 24, 2026 at 7:27 pm

    So what happens after the Earth’s core is cooled down, does the Earth slow down in speed.

  22. @FlameofDemocracy

    February 24, 2026 at 7:40 pm

    Geogenic power is certainly the key. That much is true.

    Simple is best.

  23. @roshanji3507

    February 24, 2026 at 7:47 pm

    Keep such videos under 2 minutes. Remove repetition and redundancy totally. Keep essence only.

  24. @TheLobo91

    February 24, 2026 at 8:07 pm

    I can see it now. We cant do geothermal cause it’s causes earthquakes. So let’s continue doing oula and gas fracking even though it causes earthquakes. Our species will be wiped out soon by our own stupidity. Geothermal is clearly better than oil fracking. Anything is better than that status quo.

  25. @RJS1966USMC

    February 24, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    The Earth’s atmosphere is a mixture of several different gasses that we collectively call “AIR”.
    Our “AIR” is comprised of 78% Nitrogen and 21% Oxygen.
    Add those together (78+21) and we come to 99%.
    So, what is it that makes up that last 1%?
    These are the gasses that, added together, equal that last 1%:
    Argon (Ar) 0.93%.
    The rest below added together make up that last 0.07%.
    Neon (Ne)
    Helium (He)
    Methane (CH4)
    Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
    Hydrogen (H2)
    and a few other gasses.
    So, we’re supposed to believe that CO2, which itself is LESS than 0.07% of the entire planet’s atmosphere, (Because all plant life absorbs the CARBON to physically grow bigger and releases the OXYGEN as waste.) poses a HUGE DANGER to ALL LIFE ON EARTH, and that ONLY BY PAYING A CARBON TAX to the government can we save ourselves from complete destruction of the planet?
    Please remember that ALL plant life absorbs CO2 and emits OXYGEN. And considering that OXYGEN makes up 21% of our atmosphere and CO2 is LESS THAN 0.07%, the ratio is in NO DANGER of changing to anything dangerous by human activity alone.
    The CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX is a HUGE LIE with the goal of TOTAL AUTHORITARIAN CONTROL OF EVERYONE ON EARTH.

  26. @DarthMikeRus

    February 25, 2026 at 4:38 pm

    Wow Nuclear Energy just exists) just use it again

  27. @toddschwartz6093

    February 25, 2026 at 4:41 pm

    It’s hardly a secret we no longer need oil, but you can bet that the billionaires raking in that oil profit are going to do everything in their power to prevent alternative, sustainable energy from being produced on a large scale until they have squeezed the last penny’s worth of value from fossil fuels.

  28. @JadedCoffeeDrinker

    February 25, 2026 at 5:08 pm

    I still think nuclear is the safest carbon neutral option. SMRs distributed across the USA power grids. Not giant monstrous site like SRS.

  29. @timtom2061

    February 25, 2026 at 5:17 pm

    No technology up to this point can drill deep enough to get to the kind of heat source that she’s looking for. There is a new drill out that uses lasers to basically melt The Rock. The deepest borehole ever made is in russia. Is almost possible to reach where she is talking about. But not with the decades and decades old equipment..

  30. @Bushman9

    February 25, 2026 at 5:21 pm

    The energy abundance down where the lava flows is undoubtedly enormous.
    Plus, we don’t have to burn energy to convert it into something useful.

    The problem, as I see it, is getting it from point a to point b without losing large amounts of the heat.

  31. @nathanfordiii3336

    February 25, 2026 at 5:26 pm

    Risks for earthquakes is low, this doesn’t sound so safe

  32. @brayanchuchon7053

    February 25, 2026 at 5:31 pm

    puras tonterías ted ya no es lo que era antes

  33. @StarGazerForWhatFor

    February 25, 2026 at 6:21 pm

    Cindy Taft is not suicidal

  34. @StarGazerForWhatFor

    February 25, 2026 at 6:23 pm

    This is a far far off problem, but if we take enough geothermal energy, we would weaken or stop our electromagnetic sphere

  35. @mattdclarkson

    February 25, 2026 at 6:25 pm

    Big oil says that’s not going to happen anytime soon

  36. @acousticarchivefortwayne930

    February 25, 2026 at 6:28 pm

    Great video.
    When we consider that burning a substance (wood, oil, coal) has been the method for producing energy since people lived in caves this could provide a great power source, allow us to go electric, and reduce carbon emissions. 
    Unlike oil, coal, or wood geothermal is directly below our feet. No matter where we stand on the planet. 

    From Scientific American: 
    The number of earthquakes linked to fracking operations is very small. Many more temblors are linked to conventional oil and natural gas extraction. Furthermore, the greatest risk of earthquakes due to fracking does not come from drilling into deep shale or cracking it with pressurized water and chemicals. Rather, it comes from pumping the wastewater from those operations back down into deep sandstone or other formations for permanent disposal.

  37. @sethhartley7369

    February 25, 2026 at 6:38 pm

    In ten years this will be on the front cover of an AI news listicle as part of ten programs that kept the oil industry relevant and in power.

  38. @ronniew3229

    February 25, 2026 at 6:40 pm

    Several companies that are racing towards this future, ours is one of them.

  39. @cnordegren

    February 25, 2026 at 6:46 pm

    BS
    Oil will still be king because it is easily transportable and very versatile and reliable at day and at night. We should think of renewables are diversifying energy rather then replace oil.

  40. @PanchajanyaNaadh

    February 25, 2026 at 7:39 pm

    Drill baby Drill, ain’t so bad afterall 🫡🔥

  41. @kevinclark6528

    February 25, 2026 at 7:45 pm

    Wait a min — @4:30 did I hear her say they can hit a pizza at 5 mi underground — if so look N like somebody is lying bout what is under them pyramids !!! Holy Smokes Batman –it really is true !!!

  42. @JT_771

    February 25, 2026 at 7:46 pm

    I like the effort ‘n all. But good luck competing on LCOE (levelized cost of energy) with solar + batteries. It won’t be economically viable outside of those unicorn zones if it can’t meaningfully compete this way. Don’t see it.

  43. @leducdaniel

    February 25, 2026 at 7:56 pm

    what nobody really talk about is that Oil is use in lot of medecine ….without oil , lot of thing will not be avalable and people will die if we dont find alternative medecine .

  44. @allenstarculture4971

    February 25, 2026 at 8:02 pm

    Leave the heat of the Earth in the ground.

  45. @neuralwarp

    February 25, 2026 at 8:02 pm

    So .. nuclear power .. but with fracking .. and without protective containment.

  46. @tralbi1246

    February 25, 2026 at 8:03 pm

    Without oil, the world crashes

  47. @jamesadams893

    February 25, 2026 at 8:12 pm

    I am so glad somebody figured out how to use geothermal produced electricity or energy to power the 787 dreamliner and all the other commercial aircraft around the world. Soon the USAF can get rid of all their air refueling tankers .

  48. @timallison8560

    February 25, 2026 at 8:14 pm

    instead of using geothermal in a bazillion drilling which could quite possibly eventually cool the center of our earth, we should be focusing on tidal power generation. we could use turbines in the oceanic jet streams and tidal zones to provide REAL CLEAN ENERGY.

  49. @linsen8890

    February 25, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    If it was economically viable, it would already have been done. Geothermal energy is not new, and people use it already where it makes proven sense.

  50. @jamesadams893

    February 25, 2026 at 8:19 pm

    I guess we humans will just give up all the products made with byproducts of oil and thank Cindy for getting us on the right path back to the middle ages

  51. @OldManGamingGuy

    February 26, 2026 at 4:21 pm

    Wind isn’t clean. It leaves dead birds laying around. Geothermal, on the other hand, is extremely friendly. I just posted this on Facebook a few days ago, then I saw your video. Heat is near the surface here in the west of the USA, you don’t even have to drill that deep. Solar is toxic in production, wind is lethal to wildlife. All of our non-transportation energy should be geothermal. I agree with you in that regard. I don’t intend to buy an EV, however, until the battery technology is rapid charging, longer range, and cheaper. That is coming. Until then I’ll keep my ICE car.

    EDIT: I am not discounting fusion, however.

  52. @Bruce-b7p

    February 26, 2026 at 4:39 pm

    The Tartarians all ready had free power from the ether endless . Banker couldn’t make any money so destroyed the people and the technology is now hidden

  53. @alberthartl8885

    February 26, 2026 at 4:50 pm

    This lady is talking about EGS which is second generation geothermal. Yes, there is a place in the energy mix for this technology.
    However, 3rd generation AGS is the best option for future geothermal electric generation. This is geothermal energy anywhere using closed loop systems. Two companies are currently in this space. Eavor Technology has a commercial closed loop system up and running in Bavaria. Quaise Energy is drilling a proof of concept bore in Texas right now. Time will tell which company has the best technology.

  54. @johnicex841

    February 26, 2026 at 4:58 pm

    LONG LIVE DIESEL…

  55. @gerardmcaveney332

    February 26, 2026 at 5:07 pm

    It might work in Texas where is not cold but up north you better have a backup . I am in the heating oil business in northeast Pennsylvania and I had a customer who brought into it and wound up having to put in a oil burner for him . Then I had another customer that almost brought into it when he was renovating his old farmhouse and I told him to go talk to people that have put it in . He wound up putting in a oil heating system .

  56. @joelborden3242

    February 26, 2026 at 5:08 pm

    Iceland has exploited geothermal energy for 1000 years and today it provides more than half of their needs

  57. @hipstarchild

    February 26, 2026 at 5:09 pm

    Amen to that !

  58. @frfrank1

    February 26, 2026 at 5:23 pm

    In 2006, a geothermal project in Basel, Switzerland, was permanently shut down after it triggered a magnitude 3.4 earthquake that caused minor damage and significant public concern.

  59. @liberty-matrix

    February 26, 2026 at 5:28 pm

    Wind & Solar has consumed more oil to manufacture and operate than the energy they’ve produced. Without oil!, we’d still be living in the dark ages.

  60. @Hardy_H_H

    February 26, 2026 at 5:46 pm

    I’ve always taken advice from people who look like this 😂😂

  61. @raylasley6471

    February 26, 2026 at 5:55 pm

    Got to the drill rig on a -50 degree day, was shocked to see that every door that could be opened was open. Turns out that they had been circulating brine, to clean the wellbore, for 4 days. The 500 bbls of fluid in the pits had warmed up to 100 degrees F and the whole rig was like a sauna. Well bottom was at 11,000 feet deep on Alaskas North Slope, geothermal is the real deal.

  62. @TG-lp9vi

    February 26, 2026 at 6:09 pm

    Another dumb idea.. one or two or small amount of thermal is possible but large scale world thermal is dangerous …Why because no studies have been done to find out what too much world extraction of the centre core heat or near core heat will effect that core. With out or a damaged centre core the earth will loose its atmosphere and will become unliveable. Hydrogen on the other hand does not have that problem.

  63. @fw8008

    February 26, 2026 at 6:21 pm

    😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

  64. @ralphstern2845

    February 26, 2026 at 6:22 pm

    Her hair tells you everything you need to know about her judgement.Fracking has done too much damage and benefitted only the wealthy oil companies

  65. @stinkymccheese8010

    February 26, 2026 at 6:30 pm

    Well yeah, we could do that but what would we use as an excuse to invade foreign countries then, think before you speak.😊

  66. @turbopokey

    February 26, 2026 at 7:00 pm

    That’s nice but I don’t actually see anything. Except the lady with crazy homeless hair. There has to be some reason (other than the oil companies) that this hasn’t really gotten started yet. What are they not telling us?

  67. @EJ.Quarry.Dweller

    February 26, 2026 at 7:28 pm

    I love how the fact about renewable energy the human body is never mentioned . Instead leave that body motionless let it get lazy and fat and find ways to make it dependant . So business can extract profits from a life source . Let us drill and frack and destroy the water table . She also has lied about what is all in fracking fluid . Large poisons and many chemical liquifiers and anticoagulant . Watch gasland and see how so many families and farms were destroyed by natural gas fracking . Horses and many animals losing hair . Inhabitants with ( unknown ) headaches skin sores and wells that are poisoned . Ever turn your faucet on and then light it on fire ? Yea this woman is a mouthpiece for big oil and gas . Renewable was wood heat and cooking family farm agriculture and a global population far less to leave wildlife for food . Business thinks everyone is stupid . For one I don’t like lies

  68. @JosephDukate-h9c

    February 26, 2026 at 7:30 pm

    There are several devices that can turn a turbine and create FREE ENERGY , and there isn’t any Government on earth that will allow them to be used or ever sold to the public !

  69. @Kepiwhoo

    February 26, 2026 at 7:33 pm

    I live on the big island in hawaii, we have geothermal, it sucks, àt least were we live. The drilling goes on 24 hours a day creating a very disturbing low frequency sound. There is also the danger of a blowout causing toxic fumes to escape into the surrounding area, this has happened more than once.

  70. @harbitude

    February 26, 2026 at 7:33 pm

    How much heat loss will it take to effect the geomagnetic field ? I’d rather have hotter summers then mess up the geomagnetic field.

  71. @joeltell8484

    February 26, 2026 at 7:54 pm

    Coal

  72. @markryall6790

    February 26, 2026 at 7:59 pm

    Too bad she couldn’t afford a hair brush

  73. @brucerazor5202

    February 26, 2026 at 8:00 pm

    Typical liberal, solar and wind are way to expensive on your return

  74. @dougjones3057

    February 26, 2026 at 8:01 pm

    Holy crap is she engaging! I could listen to her for seconds!

  75. @RichardAllen-xk2kw

    February 26, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    Sing HU 💙 for spiritual freedom 💙 and gain divine 💙

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Science & Technology

Why Taskrabbit’s Founder Prioritizes Diversity Early │ Build Mode Podcast

As a founder or any team builder, diversity is best built at the start. As Taskrabbit founder Leah Solivan learned, procrastination leads to weaker teams and a harder effort later. We dive into all of her expert tips for builders and founders in the latest episode of our podcast Build Mode right here:

Published

on

As a founder or any team builder, diversity is best built at the start. As Taskrabbit founder Leah Solivan learned, procrastination leads to weaker teams and a harder effort later.

We dive into all of her expert tips for builders and founders in the latest episode of our podcast Build Mode right here:

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Are orbital data centers all hype, or an actual AI infrastructure solution? l Equity Podcast

Tech companies are racing to build data centers in space, pitching orbital compute as the next frontier for AI infrastructure, even as the technical and economic realities remain far from clear. Add in OpenAI’s massive $122 billion round and Bluesky’s latest AI backlash, and the message is clear: The future of AI is being shaped…

Published

on

Tech companies are racing to build data centers in space, pitching orbital compute as the next frontier for AI infrastructure, even as the technical and economic realities remain far from clear. Add in OpenAI’s massive $122 billion round and Bluesky’s latest AI backlash, and the message is clear: The future of AI is being shaped as much by ambition and hype as it is by real-world constraints.

On this episode of TechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Anthony Ha, and Sean O’Kane unpack these massive capital bets, user backlash, and off-world compute plans along with Whoop’s major valuation and the literal downfall of robot Olaf.

Subscribe to Equity on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod.

Chapters:
00:00 Intro
00:20 A humanoid Olaf robot collapses at Disneyland Paris
03:30 OpenAI raises $122B at an $852B valuation
11:30 Whoop lands $575M and bets big on wearable data
18:50 The risks (and value) of personal health data
23:00 Bluesky’s AI feed builder sparks backlash
30:00 Can Bluesky keep growing — and compete with X?
36:30 The race to build data centers in space
44:30 SpaceX, Starlink, and the business of orbital compute
49:30 Outro

Continue Reading

CNET

Apple at 50: Sharing Our Biggest Apple Memories

With Apple turning 50 this week, Bridget Carey goes down memory lane with her CNET teammates on what it was like to cover the iconic company and how the products shaped our lives. Read more on CNET.com Apple’s 50-Year Legacy of Product Innovation, Through CNET’s Lens 0:15 CNET reporters share their favorite Apple memories 0:22…

Published

on

With Apple turning 50 this week, Bridget Carey goes down memory lane with her CNET teammates on what it was like to cover the iconic company and how the products shaped our lives.

Read more on CNET.com
Apple’s 50-Year Legacy of Product Innovation, Through CNET’s Lens

0:15 CNET reporters share their favorite Apple memories
0:22 Bridget Carey’s start with Apple
0:39 iMac G3
0:48 Jeff Carlson learns newspaper layout and Page Maker on a Mac
0:56 Aldus PageMaker
1:02 Transporting a Mac Classic across campus on a bike
1:15 Scott Stein takes a PowerBook 145 to college
1:46 Abrar Al-Heeti’s favorite gadget is the iPod Nano (3rd Gen)
2:05 Faith Chihil bought an iPod with a click wheel in 2021 and uses it today
2:25 Can someone help Faith Chihil fix her Scion’s aux input?
2:43 Bridget Carey holds off on buying the first iPhones
2:48 iPhone 3Gs was Bridget Carey’s first Apple purchase
3:00 Vanessa Hand Orellana stands in line for iPhone 3s
3:26 Patrick Holland accidentally. became the face of the Apple Store
3:56 Bridget Carey starts her job at CNET in 2011
4:07 Bridget Carey goes to the Apple Store to cover the death of Steve Jobs
4:21 Patrick Holland watched fans pay tribute to Steve Jobs by leaving notes at the Apple Store
4:52 Patrick Holland describes working at the Apple Store
5:06 Iyaz Akhtar waits in line at the Soho Apple Store for Mac OS X Leopard
5:35 Bridget Carey remembers reporting on crazy lines for Apple product launch days
5:43 Vanessa Hand Orellana remembers reporting from iPhone lines
5:56 Jeff Carlson attends Apple’s infamous U2 Songs of Innocence album release event
6:09 Tim Cook and Apple give half a billion iTunes users a U2 album for free
6:36 Apple releases a fix to delete the U2 album from your phone
6:44 Russell Holly’s iPhone 6 bendgate
6:55 Scott Stein wears AirPods for the first time and becomes a meme
7:25 The very first Apple Watch demo underwhelms Vanessa Hand Orellana
7:37 Vanessa Hand Orellana watches Tim Cook announce the very first Apple Watch
8:05 Apple Watch Series 4 changes Vanessa Hand Orellana’s opinion on the Apple Watch
8:15 Apple Watch’s pivotal move into health tech and EKG
8:30 Apple Watch helps Vanessa Hand Orellana’s family member get medical diagnosis
8:55 Bridget Carey wants to know how Apple impacted your life

Add CNET as a trusted news source
Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉
Check out CNET’s Amazon Storefront:
Subscribe to CNET on YouTube:
Follow us on TikTok:
Follow us on Instagram:
Follow us on Bluesky:
Like us on Facebook:
CNET’s AI Atlas:
Follow us on X:
Visit CNET.com:

#apple #appleevent #applestore #applenews #history #ipod #mac #iphone

Continue Reading

Trending