CNET
SpaceX Starship V3 Flight Test 12: See a Starlink Satellite’s POV with a Mounted Camera at 9:35
SpaceX conducted Flight Test 12 of its reusable Starship Version 3 (V3) rocket from Starbase in South Texas. The mission successfully launched 22 Starlink satellite dummies, one of which was equipped with an external camera to capture views of the rocket’s heat shield from space. Read more about the SpaceX mission on CNET.com The SpaceX…
CNET
Unboxing Logitech’s $80 Foldable Mouse: Mobi Fold
Logitech just dropped their first “ultra-portable” foldable mouse which features quiet clicks, up to 30 days of use with a full charge, a 15-year rated hinge and more. Unbox the $80 Mobi Fold with us in lilac. 💜🖱️ Add CNET as a trusted news source Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉…
CNET
First Look at Logitech’s $80 Foldable Mouse: Mobi Fold
Move aside Microsoft Surface Arc. 👀🖱️ With its design, Logitech’s Mobi Fold offers 22% less muscle strain compared to a laptop trackpad, and has a battery life for up to 33 days. It retails for $80, comes in four different colors and is available starting June 12. Add CNET as a trusted news source Never…
CNET
Siri AI is NOT Google Gemini
While Apple and Google did work together to make new foundational Apple Intelligence models, saying Siri AI is Gemini isn’t quite right. Patrick Holland sets the story straight. #wwdc #googlegemini #ai #siri #appleintelligence
SpaceX’s IPO Made Elon Musk a Trillionaire…Now What?│Equity Podcast
AI’s Already Reshaped the Economy. Now We See What Happens Next │ Equity Podcast
You don’t need a special talent to learn a new language #TEDTalks
Nitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
Sleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter ???? | Tech Support | WIRED
Ways you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) ????????
SpaceX’s IPO Made Elon Musk a Trillionaire…Now What?│Equity Podcast
AI’s Already Reshaped the Economy. Now We See What Happens Next │ Equity Podcast
You don’t need a special talent to learn a new language #TEDTalks
-
Science & Technology6 years agoNitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
-
People & Blogs4 years agoSleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter ???? | Tech Support | WIRED
-
CNET6 years agoWays you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) ????????
-
Wired7 years agoHow This Guy Became a World Champion Boomerang Thrower | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoNeuroscientist Explains ASMR’s Effects on the Brain & The Body | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoWhy It’s Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik’s Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoFormer FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED
-
CNET7 years agoSurface Pro 7 review: Hello, old friend ????
@CNET
May 23, 2026 at 5:01 am
Read more about the SpaceX mission on CNET.com : The SpaceX Starship V3 Set for Liftoff Today: What to Know
@masterwatch
May 23, 2026 at 5:17 am
burning hydro carbons out the back of a tube doesn’t seem like the future. It is ok for now because it is doing a job but I can’t see this being the future.
@showlett33
May 23, 2026 at 6:47 am
What can you see being the future?
@yankoaleksandrov
May 23, 2026 at 6:52 am
@showlett33i had the same question
@fsinthechat7604
May 23, 2026 at 7:16 am
the product of the reaction mainly CO2 and Water
@jonathanmay7508
May 23, 2026 at 7:29 am
Unfortunately rn that’s the only way to get into space, once you’re in space there are many alternatives but escaping the gravity well isn’t easy
@krox477
May 23, 2026 at 9:49 am
What would you recommend
@outoftheblue_UK
May 23, 2026 at 5:43 am
The 12th one seems like so many others. More space junk and more debris in the Indian ocean? All to lots of cheering, I wish I was that easily impressed.
@showlett33
May 23, 2026 at 6:49 am
I shudder to think what impresses you
@njpme
May 23, 2026 at 7:46 am
Wow let’s find what impresses a nobody. You’re so important.
@outoftheblue_UK
May 23, 2026 at 9:09 am
@njpme Elon having a manned mission to Mars in 2025, would’ve impressed me. Why would I be impressed by someone who keeps failing to do what they say they will do?
@outoftheblue_UK
May 23, 2026 at 9:13 am
@showlett33 NASA impress me most of the time, because they usually do what they set out to do, in a reasonable time frame.
@showlett33
May 23, 2026 at 9:24 am
@outoftheblue_UK Tell me of a time when NASA weren’t creating space junk and throwing equipment into the sea…
@PK-999
May 23, 2026 at 5:46 am
So it got back to earth and then blew up?
Progress?
@Bling_The_Visual_Creator
May 23, 2026 at 6:09 am
It’s meant to explode as there were no plans to recover it in the ocean.
@12user-u5h
May 23, 2026 at 6:12 am
@Bling_The_Visual_CreatorYou can help “stupid.”
@truejim
May 23, 2026 at 7:15 am
@Bling_The_Visual_Creator I think he meant: it got back to Earth and blew up again, just like the last several.
@Bennettone
May 23, 2026 at 8:32 pm
It’s progress, yes, but they’re over hyping as they didn’t want it to explode and a lot of things went wrong
@Bennettone
May 23, 2026 at 8:33 pm
@Bling_The_Visual_Creator it’s not MEANT to explode, it COULD explode for this mission and they were okay with that, but I don’t think this is desirable
@sergeivinonen6651
May 23, 2026 at 5:54 am
Очередное ведро под именем илона, упало в океан, деньги освоены, 😂 да здравствует америка маска. 😂😂😂😂
@Cesar-b2c
May 23, 2026 at 6:32 am
I have some crazy ideas as to how to carry more fuel into space using some theoretical thinking. I wish education was more affordable
@saltedcuts
May 23, 2026 at 6:41 am
propellant =EXPLOSION 😡
@rogerwadham4627
May 23, 2026 at 7:11 am
Why does it explode after it touches down? They all do it.
@truejim
May 23, 2026 at 7:17 am
They’re landing it in the ocean for now. Thin metal shell filled with flammable fluid hits ocean and busts open. Metal is hot from reentry.
@mott_scanley0029
May 23, 2026 at 9:54 am
because it’s a literal 15-story building tipping over! of course it would burst open
@erlpht6031
May 23, 2026 at 10:08 am
They want to prevent a foreign government from capturing and reverse-engineering it
@elivelive
May 23, 2026 at 10:57 am
@erlpht6031interesting
@AudibleSpace
May 23, 2026 at 12:27 pm
Remember buddy, these are flight TESTS. The plan is to eventually catch the ships back at the launch tower just as they do with the booster. But when you’re still testing systems, why risk a perfectly good launch pad and tower incase the landing were to say fail. The ocean is a safe alternative where no people, industry or infrastructure is it risk. Plus, the amount of a data collected on each of these test flights is so valuable, it’s not a priority to recover the ships at this point.
@ra3or
May 23, 2026 at 7:13 am
6:14 thats not right
@citogrid
May 23, 2026 at 8:13 am
SpaceX ‘s Starship is a massive flaming pile of excrement. Launch yesterday, the booster return boost failed miserably, the in orbit restart wasn’t executed because one of the vac engines went kaput. dummy starlinks were succesfully ejected from pez dispenser. view from ‘dodger dog” showed lots of heatshield loss…. They took 2 steps forward and 2,5 steps back. Now at the same level as 2 years ago, so negative progress. Mars??? You gotta be kidding me. Moon??? oh, sure at this rate, maybe in a decade or so for SpaceX.
@steven_alleman
May 23, 2026 at 9:59 am
There was virtually no heat shield loss… by far their best heat shield yet.
@strategicthinker8899
May 23, 2026 at 5:42 pm
If they wanted to land on the moon 8 years ago they could with Falcon Heavy and Dragon. You clearly know nothing of the the hardware SpaceX has. It’s not about landing on the moon, it’s about full reusability of the entire stack not just the booster. That will enable multi-planetary and lunar operations at a price low enough to be routine and cost effective.
@odysseusrex5908
May 24, 2026 at 8:53 pm
The dodger dog footage I saw showed no heat shield loss. What is you think you are looking at?
@minhlede
May 23, 2026 at 8:41 am
amazing and who is going to clean that up?
@steven_alleman
May 23, 2026 at 9:58 am
Every rocket company dumps their hardware in the ocean. SpaceX and Stoke are the only two companies trying to change that.
@minhlede
May 23, 2026 at 1:44 pm
@steven_allemanwell they could start now
@steven_alleman
May 23, 2026 at 2:21 pm
@minhledeThat’s what they’re doing. Rockets that do things that have never been done before take time and testing.
@minhlede
May 23, 2026 at 2:32 pm
@steven_alleman so spacex is sending clean up teams to the sea right after such an explosion?
@steven_alleman
May 23, 2026 at 4:56 pm
Where is your outrage being posted on pages like NASA, ULA, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, etc.?
SpaceX is the only major company in the world trying to put nothing into the ocean. Yet, you’re selectively criticizing them…only.
@jamiestewart7327
May 23, 2026 at 8:58 am
Video starts at 3:00
@petros0358
May 23, 2026 at 9:59 am
i ow you 3 minutes of my time thank you!
@nooahchannel
May 23, 2026 at 9:13 am
Wow, going to Mars, while I even can not afford my bread in the morning. Great world.
@StyxStyx-xz7
May 23, 2026 at 10:41 am
Get a job.
@elivelive
May 23, 2026 at 11:03 am
@StyxStyx-xz7get him one
@nelrose2494
May 23, 2026 at 11:05 am
they going to mars just to suffer more.
@odysseusrex5908
May 24, 2026 at 8:51 pm
You need to get a job, mate.
@McDonut24
May 23, 2026 at 9:33 am
did the booster actually make it back to the water or did it blow up mid air?
@steven_alleman
May 23, 2026 at 9:57 am
Made it to the water. Landing burn failed related to boost back burn engines going out.
@odysseusrex5908
May 24, 2026 at 8:45 pm
Yeah, it hit the water doing about Mach 1.5.
@charlie11ng42
May 23, 2026 at 9:34 am
Nice ending, thanks for this.
@krox477
May 23, 2026 at 9:49 am
“Space is hard”- elon musk
@krox477
May 23, 2026 at 9:55 am
The explosion at the end 11:35
@TechOs19
May 23, 2026 at 11:08 am
Classic Ai generated 😂
@Think6.6
May 23, 2026 at 10:20 am
Be SpaceX.
Take a market worth about $10B, IPO your company at $1.75T, then use Nasdaq-100 fast entry so index funds and pension-linked funds legally HAVE to buy in to track the index.
Sell only a small public slice, keep control, let ordinary people’s retirement money prop up the valuation, and add arbitration clauses so investors can’t easily sue when it all goes wrong.
@anthonypelchat
May 28, 2026 at 8:36 am
Not sure where you got the idea that their market is only worth 10b. They made 20b last year and are growing rapidly. While the 1.75t isn’t valid currently, that is where the public is interested at buying it at. Musk hasn’t even said anything about it.
@Think6.6
May 28, 2026 at 9:05 am
@anthonypelchat The Satellite Industry Association / BryceTech State of the Satellite Industry Report.
– 2024: $9.3B worldwide launch industry revenue, with 224 commercially procured launches from 259 total orbital launches.
– 2025: $12.4B worldwide commercial launch revenues, up 33 percent from 2024.
Regarding the IPO
– SpaceX IPOs at a huge valuation, reportedly around $1.75T.
– It only needs to sell a small public slice to set that valuation.
– If it qualifies for Nasdaq-100 fast entry, it can be added to the index quickly.
– Many pension-linked funds are invested in index funds that track the Nasdaq-100.
– Those funds do not pick stocks manually. Their job is to copy the index.
– So if SpaceX enters the index, those funds buy SpaceX to stay matched to it.
– That creates automatic demand from ordinary people’s retirement money.
– Meanwhile Musk can keep voting control, and arbitration clauses may make lawsuits harder.
– So the concern is: public retirement money takes the risk, while Musk keeps control.
Normally:
– A company IPOs, sells a meaningful public float, trades for a while, proves liquidity, then later qualifies for major indexes.
– That “seasoning” period lets the market test the valuation before index funds are pulled in.
– The concern with SpaceX is that Nasdaq-100 fast entry could let it skip much of that waiting period.
– SpaceX could sell only a small public slice, get valued at around $1.75T, then enter the index quickly.
– Index funds that track Nasdaq-100 would then buy it to match the index.
– That means pension-linked passive money may be pulled in after insiders set a huge valuation, while Musk keeps control and investors may have limited legal recourse.
@Sams_Uncle
May 23, 2026 at 10:32 am
Something isn’t right. Why do they cut cameras multiple times?
@TechOs19
May 23, 2026 at 11:09 am
Exactly and who’s filming 😂the earth is f!@t sir 😂Jesus is real and they are hiding that there is no God
@drachefly
May 23, 2026 at 7:46 pm
They compressed a >1 hr flight into 12 minutes
@TechOs19
May 23, 2026 at 11:38 pm
@dracheflybruh it’s fake ai generated. Have you ever asked who’s filming all that? 😂you’ve been most likely 🧠 washed
@drachefly
May 25, 2026 at 1:25 pm
@TechOs19 Who’s FILMING? Are you from the 19th century or something?
@TechOs19
May 25, 2026 at 1:33 pm
@drachefly😂 yeah right. Have you ever asked yourself who’s filming those ai generated videos? Drone footage from where?? When the rocket was landing the ocean was clear and you couldn’t see any cameras, drones
@user-hs9zi8uk1p
May 23, 2026 at 10:49 am
what they are cheering for?🤨
@Bling_The_Visual_Creator
May 23, 2026 at 1:13 pm
Launch successful, stage separation successful, payload launch successful, re-entry successful, ship flip successful.
@Bennettone
May 23, 2026 at 8:31 pm
keeping their jobs
@sparky99-o6o
May 23, 2026 at 1:08 pm
1,7T IPO and they can’t seem to make any major progress. Y’all should look closer at this IPO, its the biggest scam of all time, Musk is the greatest snake oil salesman ever. And people eat it up.
@anthonypelchat
May 28, 2026 at 8:13 am
What major progress did they not achieve? The new launch tower worked properly, the rocket launched properly, and the flight went nearly perfectly as well. The booster failed to land properly and one engine went out on the ship. However, neither of those caused an issue. It still managed to deploy 44t of payload as planned and then landed on target.
@jamesleesley
May 23, 2026 at 1:26 pm
They’ve pretty much perfected it by now. Awesome.
@kingjames7917
May 23, 2026 at 2:02 pm
I’m here to watch this video because people on x are saying it was a failure. Not only am I completely amazed by this mission, but I’m sad that it took questioning its validity to watch it. I don’t understand how they can see this as a failure. The ship did exactly what it was supposed to do and delivered its payload successfully. It’s clear that they did not intend to recover the rocket, and it flipped in order to practice recovery in the future. I’m truly confused by some people.
@nroose
May 24, 2026 at 6:25 pm
What is even meant by “flip” in this context. I am more curious about what ignited.
@odysseusrex5908
May 24, 2026 at 8:33 pm
Some people are just bone ignorant, others just hate Elon Musk, and then there are those that do go both ways.
@odysseusrex5908
May 24, 2026 at 8:38 pm
@nroose When the extremely hot, but thin, metal of the ships structure contacted the cold sea water, in naturally warped and cracked. That released the methane fuel in the tanks, which came in contact with the hot exterior metal, and eploded.
@Bash_KSA1
May 23, 2026 at 2:58 pm
Why did the booster rocket fall into the sea and explode? We’re used to SpaceX boosters returning to their base. I’m very sad that it exploded in the sea. Where is the protection of the marine environment?!
@anthonypelchat
May 28, 2026 at 8:09 am
The areas are allowed by the govt for the rocket to crash into if needed. The booster failed on its return, so it crashed into the Gulf at high speed. The ship went completely according to plan though. It came down right on target, did a simulated landing, and then crashed after the mission was over. The explosion at the end was 100% planned and approved by the govt.
@Smuds
May 23, 2026 at 6:06 pm
Imagine how excited they would be if it hadn’t exploded
@drachefly
May 23, 2026 at 7:44 pm
which? Both halves were planned to explode. The booster wasn’t planned to crash into the gulf at the speed of sound, yeah. The ship, though, did a simulated catch on a tower that wasn’t there, and completed its mission… and then because there wasn’t actually a tower there, fell over and exploded.
@odysseusrex5908
May 24, 2026 at 8:50 pm
Since it was expected to explode, since physics dictates it should explode, I imagine they would have been rather astonished at that.
@drachefly
May 25, 2026 at 1:24 pm
TBF for the ship as well… it came in rather hotter than I expect would be deemed safe for a catch.
@CalvinSimpson909
May 23, 2026 at 11:58 pm
Gai
@cocochocho2
May 24, 2026 at 4:47 am
Breathtaking 🚀🛰️
@NATHANSALAMI-m8x
May 24, 2026 at 10:58 am
Someday The USS Enterprise Star Trek Mother Space Ship Tobe It’s A Dream Come True In A Next Future 😉👍💓
@steveshady1957
May 24, 2026 at 8:02 pm
it can look like the Enterprise – you can build any shape up there – no aero needed – Enterprise goes to space dock does’nt have to land like starship which shows us how he’ll send stuff to surface of the Moon and Mars – shuttle craft – like Enterprise yay so we’re on track to be Masters of our Planetary system except for the Alien/Nuclear Bases thing which has USA and Putin gunshy of using nukes😀
@nroose
May 24, 2026 at 6:15 pm
I mean, seems like they should try to make it work before upgrading it a lot. At the present pace, it will never work.
@steveshady1957
May 24, 2026 at 8:27 pm
scaling though straight forward has its adjustments to make for sure – 100 tons now or more lost track
@anthonypelchat
May 28, 2026 at 8:04 am
It was a near perfect flight. The booster failed to return, which is the first time that happened in a very long time. And one engine went out on the ship. However, the engine that went out didn’t cause any real issue. It still came down right on target.
@Jedielson.Almeida
May 25, 2026 at 10:43 am
To all Elon haters out there: suck it!