Connect with us

CNET

This house was 3D-printed in just 24 hours

A company called Mighty Buildings is able to 3D-print 350-square-foot housing units in just 24 hours thanks to its UV-curable synthetic stone material. #3D #Printing #WTF

Published

on

Continue Reading
Advertisement
46 Comments

46 Comments

  1. G Money

    September 27, 2020 at 4:14 pm

    Dope❗️they look stronger than traditional homes. Glassed Bunkers I love it .

  2. SG

    September 27, 2020 at 4:17 pm

    Not cheap!!

  3. Bilal Hussain

    September 27, 2020 at 4:18 pm

    Yes I would love too… wondering when this can come to Canada

  4. Lumiere Silvamillion

    September 27, 2020 at 4:20 pm

    1:16 is he holding back his swings ?

  5. David Caleb Paterson

    September 27, 2020 at 4:34 pm

    Download your house now lol. if we live in a simulation it doesn’t matter anyway

  6. SS S

    September 27, 2020 at 5:00 pm

    Interesting but speed isn’t important, efficiency and cost are. If you can have a 3D printed home whether panels or modules and is is significantly cheaper then you can address the inequality of home ownership. People don’t need a house in a week they need it for 50% or less of the cost.

  7. Pito VH

    September 27, 2020 at 5:16 pm

    Here i was thinking if is 30k this company is going to take over and revolutionize the world… but like always i forgot revolutionary mean super expensive and not for the poor.. 🙄😩😩😅💯✌🏻

  8. Speck Mike Filmz

    September 27, 2020 at 5:25 pm

    Very dope

  9. Rud Dog

    September 27, 2020 at 6:39 pm

    Have to agree it is too expensive at this point in time.

  10. tallperson117

    September 27, 2020 at 6:47 pm

    That’s cool, but they need to get the prices wayyy down. $150k for a “tiny home” is ridiculous.

  11. THOMAS THE TANK ENGINE

    September 27, 2020 at 6:57 pm

    $115k for 350sq FT of space… California is suck a failure of a state

  12. Roshan Baig

    September 27, 2020 at 7:03 pm

    The future is here

  13. DAN

    September 27, 2020 at 7:04 pm

    Wouldn’t even consider it until the price goes down to a third of where it’s at.

  14. *S i l v e r B o o k*

    September 27, 2020 at 7:22 pm

    Printed in 24 hrs? Their website shows delivery starting December for 350sqft unit. 24 hrs sounds like a joke now!!!

  15. Brian Jacobs

    September 27, 2020 at 7:40 pm

    At a higher cost than 75% of the country, they make a home in 24 hours that they then have to ship. That’s not how economic viability and environmentally friendly work. I will take a pass.

  16. sneakerjoe23

    September 27, 2020 at 8:53 pm

    Too expensive and not proven but this can definitely be the future

  17. Blanc Owl

    September 27, 2020 at 9:04 pm

    Expanding across the world? Are you saying anybody want to buy that expensive home? No thanks. Better keep ur self there in the US

  18. Tilin1029

    September 27, 2020 at 9:15 pm

    3D printed homes for the rich got it.

    • okleydokley

      September 27, 2020 at 9:47 pm

      Because the rich wanna live in a house smaller then my garage?

  19. jzarlejz

    September 27, 2020 at 9:32 pm

    Yeah, no. Way too expensive to be anywhere near economical. Maybe $100k for 350 sqft is reasonable for California, but that is absolutely insane for virtually anywhere else. No idea how that’s supposed to catch on being so absurdly priced.

    • okleydokley

      September 27, 2020 at 9:46 pm

      $100k was just the structure. Add fittings, land costs, its more expensive than wood frame housing.

  20. Transcendent S

    September 27, 2020 at 9:52 pm

    I love the technology. The crappy thing is with all this technology that could be used solve the nation’s housing crisis. Instead it just prices pple out of the market. A tiny home builder can do the same square footage for about half or less of the asking price for 350sqft. model. So. While this may be “cheap” for california it isnt cheap by any means based on square footage and not cheap in the rest of country. I am curious what the mark up value is on the house versus the cost of materials to produce it.

  21. Mario Torrez Quant

    September 27, 2020 at 9:55 pm

    That’s cool!

  22. chris hicks

    September 27, 2020 at 10:53 pm

    115,000 for 350 square feet thats a terrible price good luck with that.

  23. Gerry Johnson

    September 27, 2020 at 10:59 pm

    I want one. I live on the east coast. I am handicapped and lives on fixed income. I need a small home that is affordable and functional. I would love to be a long term beta tester.

  24. Rob Oo

    September 27, 2020 at 11:38 pm

    very interesting topic. thanks for bringing it to light.

  25. Tristan Wiese

    September 28, 2020 at 1:45 am

    This is so sick

  26. 고기오리

    September 28, 2020 at 2:09 am

    망치로 칠꺼면 강하게 처야지 치는 흉내만 하고 있네

  27. Justin Wilson

    September 28, 2020 at 2:22 am

    They printing houses that takes less time and possibly materials but cost as much as regular house

    Shut up Take my money 🥴

  28. Presidential Phantom

    September 28, 2020 at 2:31 am

    😂😂😂🤡

  29. High Tech Point

    September 28, 2020 at 3:25 am

    Wasn’t the point of 3D printing to make houses more affordable these prices are crazy.

    • Roman Shocker

      September 29, 2020 at 3:41 am

      welcome to capitalism, everyone wants to make as much as they can, even if the quality is worthless…

  30. Benny_Plays

    September 28, 2020 at 4:15 am

    so cool

  31. Andrew Pham

    September 28, 2020 at 4:23 am

    Is this the solution to the high housing market in California???

  32. D G

    September 28, 2020 at 6:52 am

    If they have bungalows i am interested.. also, for this time, these are to be used for as granny flats.. if you have an existing home on your property, you can put these in your back yard or somewhere on the property..

  33. J P

    September 28, 2020 at 7:08 am

    Yes.

  34. Gaius Biju

    September 28, 2020 at 7:35 am

    It wil b damn costly

  35. MoonRaker

    September 28, 2020 at 1:59 pm

    Not cheap, considering 3D printing.

  36. CrazyKT

    September 28, 2020 at 2:30 pm

    Or they could print these small homes for the homeless and I’m sorry $150,000 for that? That doesn’t matter where you are if it’s not worth it. Jesus people are so greedy. This would have been an amazing innovation IF it was for people not for profit. Dislike.

  37. A myth Nepali

    September 28, 2020 at 3:15 pm

    Can you deliver in other countries like nepal

  38. CHRISTOPHER LILES

    September 28, 2020 at 8:24 pm

    I don’t care where it’s made and delivered. 115 grand for a very basic 350sqft building is absolutely ridiculous !!!!!
    It shouldn’t be more than 30 grand.

  39. Roman Shocker

    September 29, 2020 at 3:43 am

    i can get a better deal with 5 amigos from 7-11, they will build a small house with in a week for only $1200 and a pack of Corona

  40. Maker Mind

    September 29, 2020 at 7:48 am

    I wonder what the material is made out of, because it doesn’t seem environmentally friendly nor very insulated in any way. Apart from that it looks amazingly promising 😍. Can’t wait to see where this is going 🙌🏻

  41. Elon Musk

    September 29, 2020 at 1:49 pm

    The question is: Is the material green?

  42. Red Dwarf

    September 29, 2020 at 3:24 pm

    Houses? But they are just rooms they clearly are showing being delivered to large estates. It’s California only because no basements, warm year round so no heating etc.

  43. Ross Martinez III

    September 29, 2020 at 11:25 pm

    In Texas I can build a BIG two-story house (all in) labor and everything for $150,000…. You chose California as your opening market so that you could charge this amount.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CNET

Beats Solo 4 Review: Big Performance Upgrades, but Wait for a Sale

They mostly look the same as their predecessor, but the Beats Solo 4’s sound quality, voice-calling performance, feature set and battery life are noticeably improved. But are they worth $200? Find out in full our review at CNET.com. #beatssolo4 #beats #headphones #tech #accessories #review #headphonereview

Published

on

They mostly look the same as their predecessor, but the Beats Solo 4’s sound quality, voice-calling performance, feature set and battery life are noticeably improved. But are they worth $200?

Find out in full our review at CNET.com.

#beatssolo4 #beats #headphones #tech #accessories #review #headphonereview

Continue Reading

CNET

This Fitness App for Apple Watch Is Also an Adorable Virtual Pet

Miss your Tamagotchi? We gotchu. Habbie is one of our producer Jessica Fierro’s favorite apps for the Apple Watch and it’s easy to see why. #habittracker #habbie #tamagotchi #virtualpet #applewatch #apps #apple #fitnesstracker

Published

on

Miss your Tamagotchi? We gotchu. Habbie is one of our producer Jessica Fierro’s favorite apps for the Apple Watch and it’s easy to see why. #habittracker #habbie #tamagotchi #virtualpet #applewatch #apps #apple #fitnesstracker

Continue Reading

CNET

Must-Have Star Wars Kitchen Items for May the Fourth

Whether you’re throwing a Boba fête or having a Solo date night, these delightfully nerdy kitchen gadgets and accessories are perfect for celebrating Star Wars Day this May the Fourth (or even Revenge of the Fifth!) #starwars #droids #scifi #geeky #nerdy #maythe4th #home #kitchen #giftideas

Published

on

Whether you’re throwing a Boba fête or having a Solo date night, these delightfully nerdy kitchen gadgets and accessories are perfect for celebrating Star Wars Day this May the Fourth (or even Revenge of the Fifth!) #starwars #droids #scifi #geeky #nerdy #maythe4th #home #kitchen #giftideas

Continue Reading

Trending