14 Comments

1. 

   @m1095Triri

   November 17, 2024 at 7:07 am

   I put this video on full volume, now my neighbors think I’m having a party. I’m gonna have to disappoint them🔥

   Reply
   • 

     @cooper1095

     November 17, 2024 at 8:30 am

     ur already a disappointment but ok

     Reply
2. 

   @EyesOfByes

   November 17, 2024 at 7:33 am

   Maybe if Apple had actually make it usable by opening it up to HDMI and DP input, instead of locking it down. It’s as if they had locked down their monitors for any other device than Apple. Rich people who wanna watch their 4K Blu-Ray collection from their preferred source would buy the Pro, since it has some of the best image quality in a headset. But no, Apple is so desperate to keep their walled garden control they’d rather throw billions of dollars down the drain. Seems like they ironically focus on long term business instead of short term stock value. The only logical reason.
   Btw, why am I writing this? No one actually gives a s**t. Oh well, at least someone got to read this and say: “Duh. Of Course. U didnt have to write this long essay”

   Reply
   • 

     @johnmdelcampo

     November 17, 2024 at 7:46 am

     Duh. Of Course. U didnt have to write this long essay

     Reply
   • 

     @NicoVillanueva

     November 17, 2024 at 8:22 am

     I enjoyed the essay anyway

     Reply
   • 

     @jefferyfigueroa7893

     November 17, 2024 at 10:36 am

     I enjoyed it too plus it’s spot on unfortunately

     Reply
3. 

   @PSYCHOV3N0M

   November 17, 2024 at 8:08 am

   DESPERATE clickbait title when Vision Pro 2 is around the corner in late 2025.

   Reply
   • 

     @PTRAINBOY

     November 17, 2024 at 8:30 am

     You have to have no social skills if you’ve got to put that on your face and walk around town. Get a life and live in the real world instead.

     Reply
4. 

   @MarkLumsley

   November 17, 2024 at 8:21 am

   Maybe if we didn’t have to take out another mortgage whenever we wanna buy their new cool toy, it wouldn’t be an issue for them.

   Reply
5. 

   @harrmick6218

   November 17, 2024 at 10:50 am

   Yea, because the thing is too expensive and has features that are not needed and loose their cool factor after a while. Along with the software is not that great. There are no physical controls for games. Yea it was DOA.

   Reply
   • 

     @zero11010

     November 17, 2024 at 6:52 pm

     Controlling games would happen through a separate device. Just like pretty much anything else, right?

     You use a controller with your … Xbox, or PS5, or switch. You use either a controller or mouse and keyboard on PC games.

     Why would you expect that to be different for these?

     PSVR and PSVR2 both worked fine, and both used separate controllers. Same thing for EVERY other headset, right? Oculus, Quest and all the others.

     Reply
6. 

   @zero11010

   November 17, 2024 at 11:22 am

   People weren’t excited to spend $4,000 on an iPad they wear on their face? What? The single best feature was the ability to … watch movies which you can also do on competitors that cost 90% less.

   It’s an interesting step in this direction. Certainly not as innovative as Google Glass, but they took an existing idea and went in their own direction with it. An interesting design. An interesting solve for battery weight. It’s certainly a premium Apple device which is also on brand for them.

   Reply
7. 

   @Lruiz3865

   November 17, 2024 at 1:20 pm

   Life is good 👍

   Reply
8. 

   @vaxi3

   November 17, 2024 at 6:29 pm

   Yes, I agree with @zero11010 to me it’s more fun for watching movies. You can literally tap faster on a physical keyboard or a laptop that’s more portable than this because with this you can’t really be walking around with something as heavy as that on your face to say that you’re doing work if it’s like a holographic design where you can project everything in the room without putting something on your face and everyone can see the projection that would be mind blowing.

   Reply