15 Comments

1. 

   @dpharr100

   August 14, 2024 at 11:05 am

   Give iit 20 years

   Reply
2. 

   @WaleedZanbagi

   August 14, 2024 at 11:21 am

   What all 304 bots!

   Reply
3. 

   @Redmist.65

   August 14, 2024 at 11:30 am

   This is one of many solutions we need to be greener in the future. I wouldnt look at this to replace cars though and more the storage of excess energy. Hydrogen is difficult to store and trying to replace fuel stations would take decades.

   Cars should run on bio fuels that are created using green energy sources.

   If the only realistic application is storage of energy then why not use super heated sand batteries which are way more cost effective.

   Reply
   • 

     @danharold3087

     August 14, 2024 at 12:45 pm

     As of now Bio Fuels are still very uneconomical. Will also be a wide open door for counterfeiting it.

     Reply
4. 

   @kashyapchodankar7568

   August 14, 2024 at 12:45 pm

   Nuclear is still important for making large amount of electricity so we can have cheaper hydrogen

   Reply
5. 

   @cgourin

   August 14, 2024 at 1:25 pm

   95% efficient I call BS at best it’s a number that doesn’t include heating, cooling, compressing, the different chemicals some really expensive because they are energy intensive to get like platinum, titanium, cobalt and the miles of very high quality tubing and tanks.

   Reply
   • 

     @stickynorth

     August 14, 2024 at 2:42 pm

     Bingo! I doubt hydrogen will ever be that efficient much like methane emissions are VASTLY underreported now in some cases up to 40X.. That makes a huge climate changing difference… I hope hydrogen has SOME future somewhere but I am very skeptical of its reality based on past projections and timelines come and gone… Always just 20 years away… Right??? 😉

     Reply
6. 

   @Pr0toPoTaT0

   August 14, 2024 at 3:09 pm

   We wouldnt need hydrogen if people just let nuclear proceed. The earth literally wins when we make a nuclear power plant. Thats a fact. A weird fact but a fact nevertheless

   Reply
7. 

   @dudemetoo2053

   August 14, 2024 at 5:14 pm

   I would gladly accept dirty or grey Hydrogen if it meant the us could stop sending billions oversees for Oil and kept that money here in the US. Since the infrastructure would be built up for Hyrdogen here in the US (which would also mean more money in Hydrogen and new advance technologies in creating Hyrdrogen) than as a country we could tackle the problem of going all Green Hyrdorgen., once we stopped importing all that oil. Extracting crude oil and changing it to usalbe fuel is as black and dirty as it comes and doesn’t help the planet if we create the dirt or we import it from another country. What difference does it make if have gray hydrogen until it all wen Green, at least the US keeps the money here and it could be used to build up our country and it’s infrastructure.

   Reply
8. 

   @ARPost-kn2jl

   August 14, 2024 at 5:53 pm

   nobody realy uses a swiss army knife. since for all its features there are other better tools available

   Reply
9. 

   @Terkini-pr1nj

   August 14, 2024 at 6:59 pm

   In singapore . Electrolyzer already cheap for small size . Just 3 usd per kg hydrogen price

   Reply
10. 

    @xpnuggetbear

    August 14, 2024 at 8:41 pm

    Maybe design a Cathedral (cathode) and think of a way for a bolt of lightning to 1.21 gigawatt a freshwather lake? separate significantly more Hydrogen from Oxygen?

    Reply
11. 

    @urbanstrencan

    August 15, 2024 at 3:21 am

    can’t wait to see Hydrogen begin used more widely in automotive and heavy transport industries ❤❤❤ great video

    Reply
12. 

    @Olaf_Schwandt

    August 15, 2024 at 7:56 am

    That sounds like advertising. Where does the potassium hydroxide come from, for example?

    Reply
13. 

    @Vlican

    August 15, 2024 at 9:49 am

    Biased

    Reply