43 Comments

1. 

   @yomstarr

   January 30, 2024 at 4:55 pm

   Wow!

   Reply
2. 

   @scotthenrie5148

   January 30, 2024 at 4:56 pm

   Magnesium prevents cancer. The title for an article about that is: _”Magnesium Enables Immune Cells to Tackle Infections and Cancer”_

   Reply
   • 

     @asanta2023

     January 30, 2024 at 6:04 pm

     Really? How many milligrams?

     Reply
3. 

   @jasonsworld333

   January 30, 2024 at 4:58 pm

   Calm down Elisabeth

   Reply
   • 

     @user-nx7jmhgsdabiddhcxse

     January 30, 2024 at 6:46 pm

     Dorothy me calming down is your worst nightmare, your mother didnt prepare you for this nightmare

     Reply
4. 

   @SeedsofEcofrog

   January 30, 2024 at 5:00 pm

   We must never forget WHO coerced the children for use as shields to temporarily and marginally “protect” adults.
   Thou shall not use pregnant women as Granny shields.
   Risking the young to “save” the old is rotten to the core.

   Reply
5. 

   @SeedsofEcofrog

   January 30, 2024 at 5:00 pm

   Remember No jab No job..

   Reply
   • 

     @brittneybabeee4031

     January 31, 2024 at 2:27 am

     What about non vaccinated people who get cancer??

     Reply
6. 

   @nannybannany

   January 30, 2024 at 5:03 pm

   Cant we already? My SIL works for a company that produces cancer diagnostic products.

   Reply
   • 

     @tannhauser5399

     February 1, 2024 at 5:39 am

     Yeah we do. For a long time now. But it won’t come out in a basic, standard test – that is usually done very quickly.
     You have to request a full blood test, or they will do it if there is suspicion of cancer, and is also usually done when doing something like a full body scan (CT, MRI and so on).

     Reply
7. 

   @zeitgeist888

   January 30, 2024 at 5:05 pm

   How is this different than the Grail Galleri test for 50 different cancers already available?

   Reply
   • 

     @islammohamed1441

     January 30, 2024 at 5:53 pm

     Grail: circulating tumour DNA

     Reply
   • 

     @Bibicatluka

     January 31, 2024 at 9:21 pm

     @@islammohamed1441which one is more accurate? Circulating DNA in blood or cancer-specific RNAs in the blood?

     Reply
8. 

   @jamman7344

   January 30, 2024 at 5:05 pm

   The concept of this topic is irrelevant and very stupid considering the fact that cancer has already been decoded and cured long ago. Back in 2000 I read an article from the ’90s of how they cure cancer do babies umbilical cord cells. The new sales created other new cells and completely abolished the cancer cells. I’m pretty sure they still use this method in some ways, but the fact is this people are not knowledgeable of it which can only mean that it has been washed the side purposely.

   Reply
9. 

   @2pacalypsenow

   January 30, 2024 at 5:12 pm

   Does anyone else think this is an older american version of Will from The Inbetweeners?

   Reply
10. 

    @DeeneMuada

    January 30, 2024 at 5:14 pm

    sarcosine is a marker

    Reply
11. 

    @AnyoneCanSee

    January 30, 2024 at 5:24 pm

    Theranos solved all of this years ago. I saw her TED talk. You just need a pinprick of blood and then you put it in the magical money laundering box and you can cure all known diseases.

    Reply
12. 

    @noveltyrobot

    January 30, 2024 at 5:47 pm

    Theranos vibes

    Reply
    • 

      @walkish

      January 30, 2024 at 9:21 pm

      Just because it involves blood tests doesn’t make it Theranos. It should be subject to scientific studies to try to falsify their claims like a normal medical innovation.

      Reply
    • 

      @neilbarry7991

      January 31, 2024 at 12:13 pm

      Fullyyyyy

      Reply
13. 

    @JeanHendrix-zl5hv

    January 30, 2024 at 5:51 pm

    What else will be advantageous and very helpful for the simple cure of cancer which is plain old baking soda!! Don’t believe me just look it up

    Reply
14. 

    @justicewatch4602

    January 30, 2024 at 6:03 pm

    What if we put more money in “nano surgery” so we could cut and repair problems at the microscopic level? Why not use “mechanical” drugs, and stop gambling with real drugs. They can “see” what’s happening in you body now, why not let the bots pinpoint the problems?

    Reply
15. 

    @exp8all

    January 30, 2024 at 6:06 pm

    Google “Theranos”…

    Reply
16. 

    @FratNightGaming

    January 30, 2024 at 8:28 pm

    well im afraid of blood tests so this not gone work out for me.

    Reply
    • 

      @jaspertuin2073

      January 31, 2024 at 8:30 am

      Why? I get that some people don’t like needles etc but if that is your barrier to receive (modern) medical treatment you wont be in for a good time I’m afraid. Blood is easy to get, you should be afraid for things like spinal fluid tests!

      Reply
    • 

      @FratNightGaming

      January 31, 2024 at 9:05 am

      @@jaspertuin2073 im joking. well i do pass out from blood tests

      Reply
    • 

      @tannhauser5399

      February 1, 2024 at 5:41 am

      @@FratNightGaming – If you are a man -> try pissing on the pregnancy test and see what happens.

      If it is positive – there is quite large percentage of results, that would actually suggest that you may have a cancer. More detailed checkup is required of course, but as a fast quick test – that could be also a starting point to do (as some types of testicular cancer make human chorionic gonadotropin, or HCG – the same hormone women make during pregnancy).

      But of course, at the end, you will need a full blood test to confirm it 100%.

      Reply
17. 

    @chetcalhoun613

    January 31, 2024 at 12:27 am

    So is there a way to use RNA/mRNA to reverse cancer growth?

    Reply
18. 

    @luciano61321

    January 31, 2024 at 12:38 am

    I don’t think detecting is the problem..the real problem is allowing the cure!!! And that, unfortunately will never..EVER..be allowed.

    Reply
19. 

    @asdf8948

    January 31, 2024 at 1:59 am

    There are companies that detect cancer with a blood sample very accurately, but they first need a tumor sample so they can create a fingerprint from it. Then they can see if the treatments are working or if the cancer is still there by sequencing the DNA from a blood sample because tumors release ctDNA into the blood stream.

    Reply
    • 

      @tannhauser5399

      February 1, 2024 at 5:37 am

      @asdf8948 – true, the detection of cancer, via blood sample, has been done for a long time now. If you do a full body scan, that woudl include full blood test, they can detect that.

      Also maybe not a great shortcut, but in case of men… try pissing on the pregnancy test and see what happens. If it is positive – there is quite large percentage of results, that would actually suggest that you may have a cancer. More detailed checkup is required of course, but as a fast quick test – that could be also a starting point to do (as some types of testicular cancer make human chorionic gonadotropin, or HCG – the same hormone women make during pregnancy).

      Reply
20. 

    @sumittripathi3994

    January 31, 2024 at 2:37 am

    I think, this is more like promotional event and not making ourselves aware enough of cancer

    Reply
21. 

    @May-gr8bp

    January 31, 2024 at 2:54 am

    Great video.

    Reply
22. 

    @pauliberg3492

    January 31, 2024 at 4:11 am

    Thank you.

    Reply
23. 

    @Robis9267

    January 31, 2024 at 6:41 am

    Theranos vibes

    Reply
24. 

    @nihongo1

    January 31, 2024 at 7:37 am

    He’s explaining as if cancer is the ’cause’ of disease as supposed to being the result. As if cancer is an active thing like a virus or bacteria that ‘targets’ DNA in the body to spread as supposed to the body being in a state that causes DNA malfunction from smoking for example and cancer being the result. Something is afoot.

    Reply
    • 

      @jaspertuin2073

      January 31, 2024 at 8:32 am

      I get what you say, but in my view its more like we know there’s chicken and egg but we just want to have a good photograph so we need a camera that doesnt mind eggs or chickens in the picture

      Reply
25. 

    @scottydontyeah6363

    January 31, 2024 at 8:06 am

    I honestly thought this was the guy from inbetweeners, what a disappointment

    Reply
26. 

    @andycordy5190

    January 31, 2024 at 8:49 am

    Phenomenal. This is is such amazing science and so beautifully described.❤

    Reply
27. 

    @AyuCell-Intan

    January 31, 2024 at 10:57 am

    The Outsider is a man who cannot live in the comfortable, insulated world of the bourgeois, accepting what he sees and touches as reality. ‘He sees too deep and too much,’ and what he sees is essentially chaos. He is the one man who knows he is sick in a civilization that doesn’t know it is sick. —Colin Wilson

    *• Book:* The Outsider

    Reply
28. 

    @AyuCell-Intan

    January 31, 2024 at 10:59 am

    ❤not everything is supposed to become something beautiful and long-lasting. Sometimes people come into your life to show you what is right and what is wrong, to show you who you can be, to teach you to love yourself, to make you feel better for a little while, or to just be someone to walk with at night and spill your life to. Not everyone is going to stay forever, and we still have to keep on going and thank them for what they’ve given us!

    Reply
29. 

    @simonmaverick9201

    January 31, 2024 at 11:26 am

    Is cancer the only disease that can kill you??

    Reply
30. 

    @gregduross6245

    February 1, 2024 at 1:52 pm

    7:03 i don’t muc like the conspiracy folks, the scammers, the liars the vaccine deniers, etc. But for every Theranos their are countless people and companies moving science forward. For those who fit into one of these descriptors, it is the bright side that they will die an early death without available treatment, and thereby make an improvement to the gene pool for future generations?

    Reply