Science & Technology
What’s Our Relationship to AI? It’s Complicated | AC Coppens, Kasley Killam, Apolinário Passos | TED
In a lively conversation from TED’s brand-new Next Stage, social scientist Kasley Killam, technologist Apolinário Passos and futurist AC Coppens explore the intricate dynamics of human-AI relationships — and show how AI is already changing the ways we live, work and connect with each other. (Recorded at TEDNext 2024 on October 22, 2024) If you…
Science & Technology
Chinese robotics company Unitree’s B2-W robot | TechCrunch
Chinese robotics company Unitree’s B2-W “intelligent species” robot has multiple leg joints, allowing it to walk on rough surfaces and travel up and down slopes.
Science & Technology
How To Achieve Limitlessly | Emmanuel Acho @TED #newyear
In athletics, in business, in life, everyone sets goals. But that’s not the way to excel, according to former NFL player Emmanuel Acho, now an author and TV sports analyst. Here’s what he says to do instead. Watch his full TED Talk:
Science & Technology
What Does Poverty Look Like on a Plate? | Huiyi Lin | TED
TED Fellow and economic policy researcher Huiyi Lin is cocreator of “The Poverty Line,” an art project examining poverty through the lens of food. By photographing the daily food choices of people living at the poverty line in 38 countries and territories around the world, Lin shines a light on the problem of poverty in…
Meta, Big Tech Make Political Shifts | Bloomberg Technology
Chinese robotics company Unitree’s B2-W robot | TechCrunch
Evercore: Less than 50% Chance of TikTok Ban
-
Science & Technology5 years agoNitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
-
CNET5 years agoWays you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) 👈🏽
-
People & Blogs3 years agoSleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter 💤 | Tech Support | WIRED
-
Wired6 years agoHow This Guy Became a World Champion Boomerang Thrower | WIRED
-
Wired6 years agoNeuroscientist Explains ASMR’s Effects on the Brain & The Body | WIRED
-
Wired6 years agoWhy It’s Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik’s Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED
-
Wired6 years agoFormer FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED
-
CNET5 years agoSurface Pro 7 review: Hello, old friend 🧙
@AmazingOSadh
January 1, 2025 at 8:19 am
Hi, I have a short question: How can we ensure that AI enhances human connections and well-being without compromising authenticity and genuine relationships?
@ms9001
January 1, 2025 at 10:12 am
you are asking too much. it’s like asking my scissors how can it solve poverty.
@penyopetrov7081
January 1, 2025 at 8:22 am
I’m using AI constantly but this video is awful
@cac1700
January 1, 2025 at 11:29 am
Why?
@cyberceell
January 1, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Great, our ecology is going to be finished, thx!
@mr.c2485
January 1, 2025 at 8:28 am
Just another example of us creating something that for all the good it may offer also comes with equal bad.
We’re so enthralled with wether or not we can do something that we never think to ask if we should.
This is true of the existence of our species. Whoever/whatever allowed us to be here should have asked the same questions.
@garciavashchino1
January 1, 2025 at 9:43 am
You are on to something… We turned out okay and even if we end up erasing ourselves, it won’t really matter in the grand scheme of things, so maybe this won’t matter also. Toll booth Operator is all I can say lol
@NoastalgiLuffareLife
January 1, 2025 at 1:50 pm
Ying Yang brother…. All good need to have a bad to be something good.
Is ”development even good?
Atom boom was made by us.
Why be scared of Ai when Atom boom exist…
@TheTuubster
January 1, 2025 at 3:20 pm
By that metric books should be forbidden, as the ideas or even lies spread through books have brought wars.
Generative AI is a powerful tool to process information in relation to a personal query using statistics. Like you would not kill the invention of the printing press you don’t kill the invention of Generative AI. Instead you learn how to use it to enlighten, like we did with the printed word.
@gammaraygem
January 1, 2025 at 8:41 am
As an empath I mostly immediately sense the emptiness behind an AI generated video.
When I watch a movie with currently still living actors, I automatically connect to them the way they are now, not the role in the movie.
I find the idea of talking to a computer or robot bizarre. But then, in the 70´s a guy got rich by selling “pet rocks”.
Not for me, thanks.
@TheTuubster
January 1, 2025 at 3:23 pm
The statement provided by the author gives insights into their psychological and emotional inclinations:
Empathy and Sensitivity to Authenticity:
The author claims to have an empathetic ability to sense the “emptiness” in AI-generated videos. This suggests a high degree of sensitivity or an intuitive perception of authenticity versus artificiality. Such sensitivity might indicate a preference for genuine human interaction, where empathy plays a significant role in connecting with others. This could be linked to a personality trait where one values authenticity highly, possibly preferring real human experiences over simulated ones.
Connection Beyond the Narrative:
The author’s experience of connecting with actors in their current state rather than their portrayed roles might suggest a tendency towards seeing through or beyond the surface narrative. This could imply a metacognitive approach to entertainment, where the author consciously or subconsciously acknowledges the performative aspect of acting, thus maintaining a connection with the actor’s real identity rather than their character.
Perception of Technology:
The author finds the idea of interacting with computers or robots “bizarre.” This reaction might reflect a form of technological alienation or skepticism towards the integration of technology in human social or communicative roles. It could be indicative of a generational or personal resistance to changes in how society interacts, especially if the author feels more comfortable with traditional forms of interaction.
Historical Reference and Cynicism:
The mention of the “pet rock” fad from the 1970s serves as both a humorous acknowledgment of past absurdities in consumer culture and might hint at a cynicism or skepticism towards new technological trends. By likening talking to AI to buying pet rocks, the author might be suggesting that current tech trends could be seen as equally nonsensical or superficial in the future. This could reflect an awareness of the cyclical nature of trends and perhaps a critical view of human gullibility or the marketing of novelty over substance.
Psychological Disposition:
Overall, the author appears to have a disposition that values deep, authentic connections, possibly feeling out of place with the increasing digitization of human interactions. There might be an underlying nostalgia or preference for more tangible, human-centric experiences. The blend of empathy, critique of technology, and historical comparison suggests an individual who is reflective, perhaps introspective, and not easily swayed by technological advancements without considering their human implications.
This evaluation is speculative, based on the content of the statement, and would need to be further validated with more direct interaction or psychological assessment to confirm these insights.
(Generated with Grok)
@plasticpippo201
January 1, 2025 at 9:12 am
this talk sounds very academic to me and not very practical: openAi for example is slowly going from being non profit to being a for profit org. we already know what a for profit company does: maximise income and hence engagement to sell something.
also about ethics: how do you concile western mentality with something like a Taleban government? or an even closer example: how do you compromise between a democrat and a republican in the us? it is too polarised there days. the concept of open source is great, but will it work in the context of ai, where you need millions or even billions to train a model? a single humble gpu costs hundreds of thousands of dollars…no one is going to spend that much money without thinking of profit
@garciavashchino1
January 1, 2025 at 9:41 am
As long as money can be made from anything… people will find a way to ruin it for others I PROMISE!!!
So, with this in mind, if it’s not implemented w/ a REQUIRED “AI Generated Warning”, people will and can be taken advantage of.
@AshleeWalkerTea
January 1, 2025 at 9:54 am
I am more interested in whats my relationship is with God!
@brittonprice637
January 1, 2025 at 10:24 am
It’s an inanimate object. Welcome to clown world.
@TheTuubster
January 1, 2025 at 3:29 pm
It’s not even that. It is simply a software program running statistical mathematics on the push of a button.
@AIWorks2040
January 1, 2025 at 10:27 am
Do these guys even know how the LLMs work
@AIWorks2040
January 1, 2025 at 10:30 am
And the guy had to practice more.. If he had practiced the script with friends, family, or someone else, it would have turned out better.
@Celestialrob
January 1, 2025 at 10:30 am
Ironic to watch this topic while the apes in the audience played with their phones.
@Cinemagic07
January 1, 2025 at 10:40 am
INDIAN 🇮🇳ONLY LIKE YOU
@_BangDroid_
January 1, 2025 at 10:52 am
Another important question is “How does AI affect the relationships between corporations and consumers or governments and citizens?”
@RickHarrison519
January 1, 2025 at 11:04 am
Attention everyone.
Pay attention to YouTube comments now, and you’ll realize how many ‘opinions’ are actually AI accounts.
You can tell because the vast majority of accounts created are less than one year old. They will have random numbers and letters after their names(not always). Once you identify one it’s easier to identify more. And they are pushing an agenda that a lot of times has nothing to do with the video.
Just keep an eye out and don’t believe every opinion you read. Begin asking why it wants you to read what it’s saying in the first place. What ideas are being pushed out to the public?
@RickLambert963
January 1, 2025 at 11:17 am
We are foked from the moment AI was taught how to lie.
@RussellWorkman
January 1, 2025 at 11:44 am
You “ARE” Your A.I. !* > Geez…. [ a.i. is all about programming and logical options of choice. ALL programmed by man, & mankind is FLAWED ! ] > Plus That Also Means It Can Be Swayed in ANY Preferred Opinionated Directive. A.I. Is A LIE !* > Metal , Solder, Wiring & Chips Don’t Think For Themselves !*
@indradarmaputra8049
January 1, 2025 at 12:53 pm
Thanks God
@yagrauff9311
January 1, 2025 at 1:23 pm
Does AI, as a conglomerate, always laugh that hard in the background due to the nature of our human questions?
I mean, ‘Just how really stupid could we really be?’
[IE. Give this basis *_all_* our knowledge and *_all_* reasoning parameters and expect that this machine will not develop without any covert motivations in the long run; what are we trying to do: *_prove_* Kubrick wrong?]
@brendabeamerford4555
January 1, 2025 at 1:36 pm
Its OUR M8ND 369 VIBES TRAINING WHEELS
@dennistucker1153
January 1, 2025 at 2:15 pm
A.I. will be responsible for the death of many people. And not just once or twice.
@JCUDOS
January 1, 2025 at 2:20 pm
Didn’t watch the video but that title is great: “Relationship Status: It’s Complicated” XD
@PatriceBTC
January 1, 2025 at 2:21 pm
Cringe AF. Maybe next time also invite e/acc people and not only “AI is just a tool” decels, so there can be a balanced conversation.
@TheTuubster
January 1, 2025 at 3:33 pm
Generative AI is in fact just a tool. It is literally a software program processing data using statistics that you can run on any modern gaming PC with an Nvidia graphics card. That is what Generative AI is at its core. The magic trick is the processing of huge amounts of data in the span of a couple of seconds.
@TheTuubster
January 1, 2025 at 3:09 pm
Evaluation of Videocontent
This transcript appears to be from a panel discussion or a talk focusing on the intersection of AI and human connection, featuring two experts: Castley Kiley, a social scientist specializing in human connection and health, and Apolinario Pasos, head of machine learning for art and creativity at Hugging Face, also a multimodal AI artist. Here’s an analysis based on the content:
Key Themes and Discussions:
AI and Human Connection:
Social Isolation: The discussion highlights the loneliness epidemic and how AI might serve as a tool for connection, though it raises questions about the authenticity of such connections.
AI as Companions: There’s a deep dive into how AI companions can mimic human interaction, providing emotional support but also posing ethical and psychological challenges. The example of an AI’s glitch stopping it from saying “I love you” illustrates the dependency some users have on these systems for emotional support.
Ethics and Trust in AI:
Anthropomorphism: The panel discusses how AI is often designed to mimic human-like interactions, which can lead to users forming emotional attachments that might not be reciprocated genuinely by AI.
Trust and Control: There’s a significant focus on whether users and society can trust AI, given that it’s not just the technology but the companies behind it that shape its behavior and ethics.
AI in the Workplace:
Productivity vs. Creativity: The panel explores whether AI should be used to merely increase efficiency or also to enhance creativity and human interaction.
Work Environment Changes: There’s an acknowledgment of historical parallels with industrialization, questioning whether AI will truly free up time for more human-centric activities or if it will lead to more work under different guises.
Societal Impact and Governance:
Social Fabric: The experts discuss how AI could alter social interactions, potentially exacerbating issues like digital divide unless intentionally designed to bridge gaps.
Open Source and Regulation: There’s a call for more transparency, open-source development, and community involvement in AI to ensure it serves societal good rather than just commercial interests.
Recommendations:
Human-First Approach: Both experts advocate for using AI in ways that augment rather than replace human interaction, emphasizing real human connections over AI simulations.
Analysis:
Content Quality: The dialogue is rich with insights, combining personal anecdotes with broader societal implications, making it engaging and thought-provoking.
Expertise: The presence of experts from both social science and AI development provides a balanced view, discussing both the technology’s capabilities and its social implications.
Audience Interaction: The inclusion of audience questions adds a dynamic element, showing real-time engagement and diverse perspectives on AI’s role in society.
Potential Improvements:
Clarity on Technical Terms: For a general audience, some technical terms or concepts might benefit from simpler explanations.
Deeper Ethical Exploration: While ethics are discussed, there could be more in-depth exploration of ethical frameworks or specific case studies to illustrate points made about AI’s ethical use.
Cultural Sensitivity: The discussion seems mindful of global perspectives, especially in terms of ethical considerations and the digital divide, though more could be done to include non-Western viewpoints explicitly.
Overall, this video content provides a nuanced exploration of AI’s role in human life, particularly in enhancing or complicating human connections, with a strong emphasis on ethical considerations and societal impact.
(Generated using Grok from video subtitles)
@gasdive
January 1, 2025 at 4:41 pm
The relationship humans have with AI is the same as the dodo had when they saw the rat infested ships drop anchor for the first time.
@c.3060
January 1, 2025 at 7:11 pm
누가 이영상의 줄거리를 적어주실분 있으신가요? 부탁드립니다