42 Comments

1. 

   @sophiaisabelle000

   November 30, 2023 at 7:09 am

   That’s a good question. Personally I think photosynthesis has impacted our environment in more ways than one. If it can provide long-lasting solutions, then I see why people might think of this a possibility.

   Reply
2. 

   @lexgo8013

   November 30, 2023 at 7:11 am

   I am optimistic and have hope for the future. Humanity is great. Thanks for this Ted Talk

   Reply
3. 

   @timkiemdautu

   November 30, 2023 at 7:23 am

   Follwer mình, mình sẽ Follower lại ❤❤❤

   Reply
4. 

   @jennifergonzalez2196

   November 30, 2023 at 7:25 am

   7:14:54 Can we all appreciate how much effort he puts in her videos💕

   Reply
5. 

   @user-si7sw7xy4n

   November 30, 2023 at 7:30 am

   No Today

   Reply
6. 

   @deborapereira434

   November 30, 2023 at 7:43 am

   Vídeo que mostra a nossa real necessidade, juntos venceremos!! ❤

   Reply
7. 

   @samarthchavan111

   November 30, 2023 at 7:54 am

   The base line ” GENETICALLY MODIFIED ” . And this is very dangerous. 📌

   Reply
   • 

     @Fastlan3

     November 30, 2023 at 9:28 am

     Everything is dangerous. Better not go outside, the sun will give you cancer.

     Sorry, just giving you a hard time, of course genetically modifying nature will inevitably lead to some issues, and it is good to practice caution.

     Reply
8. 

   @1e2werks15

   November 30, 2023 at 7:59 am

   Be very careful of unintended consequences.

   Reply
9. 

   @americanadorkus9563

   November 30, 2023 at 8:19 am

   God supplied everything we need, governments controlling water and production and freedom and lying about practically everything is what’s killing humanity…

   Reply
   • 

     @Fastlan3

     November 30, 2023 at 9:25 am

     Lol… Not saying the government is not part of the problem at times, but your take is asinine. Please stop spreading your unhelpful opinion.

     Reply
   • 

     @samsonili824

     November 30, 2023 at 9:51 am

     Hi my name is Alisa. So I’d like to come to you,Hugh spirited and wealthy in mind. The concept I’d like you to consider is the fact of the usage of practicality. Now I say this in the hopes you would come to understand the usage of a “lie” as If it were the truth, just broken down. 2 to 4 to 5 to 6. 1.34 13.401 135.123 28.34. Simple equation. Spent by Bill. Thank you for your consideration. Love Alisa ili

     Reply
   • 

     @ManuelDelaflor

     December 4, 2023 at 10:35 am

     So predictably wrong.

     Think again. The problem is that corporate greed is buying out politicians.

     Reply
10. 

    @cosmiclettuce

    November 30, 2023 at 8:39 am

    The insufficiency problem isn’t a problem with production — we currently grow much more than what we can consume with a lot of that coming indirectly through animals. The actual problem is distribution, which is political. What better way to control a population than by keeping it hungry? So while I’m all for improving how we grow our food, the solution to hunger lies with how we treat one another. Thank you for this excellent talk! 🙂

    Reply
    • 

      @keithbell9348

      November 30, 2023 at 10:20 am

      A few years ago I found out that the earth- all by itself, without human interference- produces on avg up to 60 times more food per day, than every human on this planet can consume.
      Which means that if you had 3 meals a day, after dinner- you would still have 57 more plates of food waiting for you to consume.
      You are absolutely correct. The planet is doing fine on its own. The problem is government regulation on food production and the consumer model they set up.

      Reply
    • 

      @gottagofast62

      November 30, 2023 at 12:38 pm

      Appreciate someone bringing this up. The whole idea that production is the issue is used to cover up the actual deep rooted issues in the global food system.

      Reply
    • 

      @cosmiclettuce

      November 30, 2023 at 1:11 pm

      Improving food production in the way that Mr Long describes will ***definitely*** help everyone, especially if the food gets better (delicious, more nutritious, etc.). We can improve food distribution, but only if we want to.

      Reply
    • 

      @nicohorndler2522

      December 1, 2023 at 7:28 am

      It’s even worse. We have the means to distribute the food we have to basically every corner of the planet, but thanks to the commodisation of food, instead of various food sources collaborating to feed the planet, they compete and displace each other. Evolved economies with excessive food push their product so hard on the developing world that the local producers can’t compete and have to leave the market, becoming consumers themselves instead of producers.

      When the food exports then become redirected or increase in price, often based more on speculation than actual market conditions, the consumers in these countries can’t afford the imported food, but also can’t produce their own any more.

      The problem is even worsened by agricorps pushing genetically modified and thus “licensed” food on these markets, which cannot be continuously be grown from last year’s seeds, but where the seeds have to be purchased again and again and again.

      Essentially, the developing world with its agrindustry is destroying native markets and growth cycles for the sake of profit, then leaving the area in the dust, when economic conditions change or they find better places to exploit.

      And while the technology in this talk seems brillinat from a scientific perspective, it only worsens the issue by creating even more competetive industrialised food that will be abused to destroy more local farming. Or does anybody believe such types of grain will stay free and unrestricted in their use one they leave the prototype stage and become marketable?

      Of course, if you would stop selling these modified seeds and instead make them a common good, that would be a real game-changer and probably help significantly to solve the hunger problem, but that would be communism, and better dead than red, right?

      Reply
    • 

      @keithbell9348

      December 1, 2023 at 8:47 am

      @@nicohorndler2522 Excellent explanation

      Reply
11. 

    @tzkickz5543

    November 30, 2023 at 9:29 am

    Carbon based life thrives in a carbon abundant environment. More carbon in the air more lung infections and quicker deaths in animals(including humans). Inturn feeds more carbon into the soil feeding plants more food it likes makes bigger plants.

    Reply
12. 

    @mathew00

    November 30, 2023 at 9:33 am

    I’m good with making things more efficient, but if we ever lose the ability to put some seeds in our pocket, plant them in ordinary soil and grow food/seeds I would have to believe we don’t have a bright future.

    Reply
13. 

    @samsonili824

    November 30, 2023 at 10:00 am

    Hey its Alisa ili Agian. Coming to you alive and welcoming. Now heres something i just though through.
    So the placement of the plant escalated the plant like a bomb. Now in order to energies the plant enough for photosynthesis to project we have to compensate it by 4 by 2 so 12. Its like a bomb energy for energy. To rallie the plant into one microdose.

    Reply
14. 

    @keithbell9348

    November 30, 2023 at 10:13 am

    I can only imagine if such was achieved, to the benefit of mankind,
    Governments would in turn, hack it. They would regulate it, control the increased food production, place regulations on the farmers who grow it,
    and find a way to enrich revenue by increasing food prices.
    And any over produced food that will not be sold because of populace not able to afford it?
    Throw it out.
    Unreal.
    But I guess someone told me that is what they do right now…

    Reply
15. 

    @ronkirk5099

    November 30, 2023 at 10:36 am

    Because of excessive topsoil erosion and groundwater depletion, we may need to use more and more genetic engineering of food crops just to keep up with population growth which will hopefully peak in a couple decades. Being able to incorporate corn’s C4 carbon fixing pathway into other crops with only less efficient C3 pathways would be a game changer.

    Reply
    • 

      @BS-detector

      November 30, 2023 at 2:21 pm

      Wrong thinking, just absolutely wrong. You know nothing about organic life and the earth’s ability to heal itself. Regenerative farming practices are 100% organic and the way everything needs to go. Scientists are just doing the bidding of a monopolistic capitalist monster who doesn’t realize that GMOs are worse pollution than plastic. Why? Because plants spent millions of years evolving into what they are and humans adapted along with them. So some arrogant, greedy fool comes along and thinks he can own everything by putting a patent on it…which should be illegal, btw, because altering a plant is not an invention, it’s a perversion and one that’s made us sicker and sicker the more its done. Get money out of the picture when it comes to basic human needs and you see how little value these billionaires actually have to offer. Organic is free, needs to stay free, and should be respected by everyone. The reason why bioengineering of the weather is so prevalent now is so gates foundation can monopolize on foods…he’s a control freak. Creating problem so he can charge to solve them. Enough is enough. He’s destroying everything by ‘sciencing’ it to death.

      Reply
16. 

    @ilravenlollistreams1892

    November 30, 2023 at 10:46 am

    This video is high quality and very educational, thank you!👍8

    Reply
17. 

    @OldOneTooth

    November 30, 2023 at 11:18 am

    We also evolved in a lower co2 environment and have processes regulated by co2 concentration. I wonder how this effects us and out livestock.

    Reply
18. 

    @chaser595

    November 30, 2023 at 11:55 am

    We already over produce. Dude is going to patent it for money made and people are stupid enough to by these plants that are grown in modern farming that are depleting soil resources.

    Reply
19. 

    @ksilebo90

    November 30, 2023 at 3:09 pm

    What about Rubisco tho?

    Reply
20. 

    @dameanvil

    November 30, 2023 at 3:11 pm

    00:04 🌍 Food insufficiency affects approximately one in 10 people globally, a number expected to worsen, especially in African and Asian countries.
    01:02 🌱 Photosynthesis in plants, responsible for producing food and oxygen, operates at about one-fifth of its potential efficiency.
    02:33 🖥 A digital twin model of photosynthesis was built to optimize and understand changes in the complex process, facilitating improvements in plant efficiency.
    05:02 🌿 Modifying plants to increase the abundance of a specific protein, SBPase, resulted in higher photosynthesis and yield, indicating potential for enhancing crop production.
    06:29 🔄 Adjusting crops to anticipated future carbon dioxide levels led to increased yield, demonstrating that evolution hasn’t kept pace with environmental changes.
    07:26 ☀ Improving plants’ adaptation to changing light conditions by regulating proteins showed a 20%+ increase in soybean seed yield.
    08:51 🌾 Collaborative efforts between scientists have led to combining photosynthetic enhancements with insect-resistant crops like cowpea, aiming to improve yields for vulnerable communities.
    10:51 🌿 Enhancing photosynthesis not only aids in addressing food insufficiency but also helps protect the environment and offers the potential for reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide.

    Reply
21. 

    @user-uy2ps6ii1r

    November 30, 2023 at 6:22 pm

    Hunger is not a lack of food, but a lack of salary

    Reply
22. 

    @jennifergonzalez2196

    November 30, 2023 at 6:28 pm

    5:19:55 Can we all appreciate how much effort he puts in her videos💕

    Reply
23. 

    @tehdii

    November 30, 2023 at 6:40 pm

    Put mirrors between rows of shrubbs 🙂

    Reply
24. 

    @vaennl9

    November 30, 2023 at 7:50 pm

    Can we hack Jeff Bezos’ bank account to feed the world?

    Reply
25. 

    @Picci25021973

    December 1, 2023 at 1:53 am

    “Seeds are royalty-free” That’s why I put “LIKE” to this video.

    Reply
26. 

    @mariaantoniettamontella9173

    December 1, 2023 at 4:50 am

    bravo

    Reply
27. 

    @NeoFighterX

    December 1, 2023 at 5:43 am

    Now to modify TEDTalks to get a higher yield of this calibre as opposed to the noise and fluff we get inbetween

    Reply
28. 

    @petra_cheung

    December 2, 2023 at 5:49 am

    That’s very interesting. Thank you for the sharing on hacking photosynthesis. I have never thought about it until I saw the title.

    Reply
29. 

    @unkleskunky

    December 4, 2023 at 11:28 am

    where do we find the studies on the tolerability of these items? To include the effect on human microbiome?

    Reply
30. 

    @mouabo1

    December 4, 2023 at 4:32 pm

    So the answer to feeding the world is GMOs? Gtfoh!

    Reply
31. 

    @arkoobi

    December 6, 2023 at 12:07 am

    So, GMOs.

    Reply
32. 

    @darinherrick9224

    December 6, 2023 at 2:22 pm

    To anyone who doesn’t believe life was designed by an intelligent creator: “Photosynthesis isn’t Rocket Science: It’s Harder”

    Reply