Connect with us

Entertainment

Forensics Expert Answers Crime Scene Questions From Twitter | Tech Support | WIRED

Crime scene analyst Matthew Steiner answers the internet’s burning questions about forensics and crime scenes. Why don’t we use chalk outlines for dead bodies anymore? How did OJ Simpson get acquitted? How many people got away with murder before DNA evidence? How does height affect blood spatter? Matt answers all these questions and much more!…

Published

on

Crime scene analyst Matthew Steiner answers the internet’s burning questions about forensics and crime scenes. Why don’t we use chalk outlines for dead bodies anymore? How did OJ Simpson get acquitted? How many people got away with murder before DNA evidence? How does height affect blood spatter? Matt answers all these questions and much more!

Director: Justin Wolfson
Director of Photography: Samuel Levine
Editor: Ron Douglas
Expert: Matthew Steiner

Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Brandon White
Production Manager: Eric Martinez
Production Coordinator: Fernando Davila

Camera Operator: Claudio Corredor
Audio: Adam Gold
Production Assistant: Ryan Coppola

Post Production Supervisor: Alexa Deutsch
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Assistant Editor: Paul Tael

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:

Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
135 Comments

135 Comments

  1. Maria

    December 6, 2022 at 8:57 pm

    i have a forensics test tomorrow thank you

  2. sndmnc

    December 6, 2022 at 9:05 pm

    any expert that uses shotspotter as a positive example of anything is not an expert.

  3. Tinman

    December 6, 2022 at 9:20 pm

    It’s so sad that i can’t send my own questions to these experts, I wish I knew before these interviews happens, we could submit questions and they could answer some of them maybe.

  4. Lara’s Flying Adventures

    December 6, 2022 at 9:24 pm

    I’m a student forensic scientist now 🎉😊

  5. Ecvj TV

    December 6, 2022 at 9:43 pm

    I wanna see this guy and Victor the mortician to do one together! 😀

  6. madison ham

    December 6, 2022 at 9:46 pm

    What if the skeleton doesn’t identify as male or female? Bigots

    • Justa Youtuber

      December 6, 2022 at 10:40 pm

      Hips don’t lie

  7. Hidden

    December 6, 2022 at 10:08 pm

    Most of the forensics field is STILL very much guesswork, and in some cases, borders on pseudo-science used to falsely incriminate people.

  8. Red Parsley

    December 6, 2022 at 10:09 pm

    I am the only one who thought the person asking about the Dead Marshes meant the ones in Lord of the Rings?

  9. does it come in pink

    December 6, 2022 at 10:11 pm

    “How many people got away with murder before forensic science improves and DNA?”

    1:55 : “a better question would be how many people got wrongfully convicted before forensic science”

    YES

  10. AbuAmin

    December 6, 2022 at 10:23 pm

    @ 00:30 so the time did come for the Augmented reality to be used in forensic?
    4 years ago you said there is a research! and here we go.:) congrats.

    @18:00

  11. Justa Youtuber

    December 6, 2022 at 10:33 pm

    I would like to see him break down movie / TV scenes on what is accurate or incorrect.

  12. Jake Buehner

    December 6, 2022 at 10:34 pm

    Never knew there was a difference between spatter and splatter. #themoreyouknow

  13. Justa Youtuber

    December 6, 2022 at 10:43 pm

    Blood spatter interpretation has a long history of being very subjective, and often wrong.

  14. Nevyn

    December 6, 2022 at 10:53 pm

    Sherlock Holmes didn’t inspire forensic science, he was based on the more impressive Dr Joseph Bell who was a pioneer of the field of forensics (forensic pathology particularly) at a time when science was not widely used at crime scenes. He would demonstrate the need for close attention at crime scenes by picking random strangers and deducing their occupation and recent activities.
    And with all this tech and science and modern advances, you have to wonder why the murder clearance rate in the US is at an all-time low, with clearance rates at 50% as of 2022.

  15. Child Crippler

    December 6, 2022 at 10:58 pm

    Hope he doesn’t catch me.

  16. Sam

    December 6, 2022 at 11:10 pm

    2:00 thats the case of Pablo Ibar, no DNA of him yet he is still in jail for no reason

    • Sb

      December 6, 2022 at 11:24 pm

      Guilty!!!

  17. Janet F

    December 6, 2022 at 11:34 pm

    I like this guy👍

  18. Mahbu

    December 6, 2022 at 11:56 pm

    I was given to understand that fingerprints were not unique to people and that there were misidentifications based on fingerprints. That it’s a myth, just like how snow flakes are not all unique. Which, to be clear, two snowflakes CAN be the same.

  19. K40l4

    December 7, 2022 at 12:03 am

    Expectation: How to get away with murder?
    Reality: Here’s how we fold a paper into an envelope.

  20. John Doe

    December 7, 2022 at 12:07 am

    How about Klaus Schwab and the entire WEF?

  21. kritikusi-666

    December 7, 2022 at 12:38 am

    Now, can you explain the 10000000x zoom on CSI, how is that achieved?

  22. loveforeignaccents

    December 7, 2022 at 12:54 am

    Very interesting!

  23. Infinite Monkey

    December 7, 2022 at 1:15 am

    It seems like serial killers aren’t much of a thing anymore due to the immense digital foot prints everyone has.

  24. Matt Thai

    December 7, 2022 at 1:15 am

    Have they put a chalk line around Yoel Roth’s boday? 🤣

  25. Jaybird MCs

    December 7, 2022 at 1:21 am

    Forensic science and tarot are equally fake but only one puts millions of people behind bars

  26. Brad Prichard

    December 7, 2022 at 11:09 am

    Nothing but softballs in this one. Given how many forensic techniques there are with little data to back them up, would have liked to see something a little more substantive. By his telling, all these advancements in forensics are amazing, yet the police are solving a lower percentage of cases even with vastly fewer murders compared to more primitive times (say 30 years ago).

  27. notyourcontent

    December 7, 2022 at 11:12 am

    One more question, how do investigators decide to just go back to an old unsolved case and restart the investigation on it? Do they have free time on a random day and just say “Oh, let’s try out this new tech on this one cold murder case back in 1963”

    • rickydoa

      December 7, 2022 at 8:55 pm

      i’m assuming because they find some sort of new evidence that relates to the case. If it opens up a new lead then it may be worth reopening.

  28. ThatGuyShaq

    December 7, 2022 at 11:23 am

    Nice save on that final bit of the OJ question. Throwing in that IF he really did it 😂

    • Rick writes

      December 7, 2022 at 5:21 pm

      Just like the title of OJs book.

  29. Paskeros

    December 7, 2022 at 11:46 am

    That was especially interesting! Please upload more of it!

  30. hakasims

    December 7, 2022 at 11:50 am

    So when seven mobsters were murdered, that outcry resulted in a gun control law, but now that children are dying by dozens every month, nothing? Only in America 🇺🇸

  31. Dr. Rave

    December 7, 2022 at 12:00 pm

    You’ll never know how many people got away with it, they’re just simply smarter than a compound of humans policing how we behave, and they’re everywhere, most tame and all unknown.

  32. Cole Thompson

    December 7, 2022 at 1:12 pm

    80% of Twitter users are bots

  33. theluschmaster

    December 7, 2022 at 1:25 pm

    Why does this make me think of the Blacklist?

  34. Lois Enolp

    December 7, 2022 at 2:37 pm

    I love this guy! Imagine the stories he can tell!

  35. hnngg hnnggg

    December 7, 2022 at 3:40 pm

    propaganda piece

  36. John Morris

    December 7, 2022 at 3:46 pm

    Homicide clearance rates in the US has been falling for decades. Use to be 70% bout 50% currently according to the FBI.

  37. Chill Gaming Vibes

    December 7, 2022 at 3:47 pm

    Answered a question with another question. And thats it for me… terrible.

  38. Michael Espinosa

    December 7, 2022 at 4:16 pm

    Drink apple juice because OJ will kill you.

  39. CutiePi

    December 7, 2022 at 6:07 pm

    Great information! Thank you for this.

  40. Roam The World

    December 7, 2022 at 6:19 pm

    Thank you for your service!

  41. bea

    December 7, 2022 at 7:03 pm

    very interesting to watch as someone who wants to study forensics in uni

  42. mikeysrose

    December 7, 2022 at 8:18 pm

    What prompts a detective or a department to look into a cold case again years later to see if it’s now solvable? Is there someone whose sole job is to scan old case files and determine which ones might be reopened based on new technology/information?

  43. David Medlin

    December 7, 2022 at 8:38 pm

    Are you really a scientist. Because they have found repeat finger prints….

  44. Gostovah S

    December 7, 2022 at 8:58 pm

    Oh god — that last question of someone seeking to make lots of money for a job of proving guilt or innocence seems like a recipe for disaster

  45. PEPPERslim

    December 7, 2022 at 9:09 pm

    You look like you could be related to Rudolf Steiner

  46. Angel b

    December 7, 2022 at 10:07 pm

    Utah – 4 University of Idaho students murdered in their sleep. Why is it taking so long to find any evidence? Does DNA analysis actually take so long? And is it in any form possible to kill 4 people without leaving anything like DNA behind?

  47. Apathy Guy

    December 8, 2022 at 12:19 am

    PBS Frontline and the FBI at this point don’t agree with you on fingerprints. The FBI was ready to convict a man of a terrorist bombing because they matched his fingerprints to somebody else. How do you not know this? Beyond that all the fingerprint experts said at the end of the day it is just a guess on the part of the person doing the analyzing. This is an art not a science again how does a forensic analyst not know this?

  48. Apathy Guy

    December 8, 2022 at 12:25 am

    OJ Simpson was acquitted because he had a black jury. I know this because I have watched and listened to interviews done by the jurists themselves.

  49. RG Astrofotografia

    December 8, 2022 at 12:48 am

    Galera, conjunção de Marte com a Lua hoje tá rolando. Máximo lá pra meia-noite que é a oposição de Marte e máximo da Lua cheia. Na América do Norte e Europa vai ter ocultação.

  50. Peter Gerdes

    December 8, 2022 at 2:44 am

    The claim the each person’s fingerprint is unique is simply false. Or at least so misleading as to be tantamount to false. Look up the Brandon Mayfield case. Or, if you doubt the sources read the justice department’s own review of the incident: (link removed bc false spam positive)

    So even in the highest profile cases with the most experienced experts it turns out sometimes fingerprints do match someone else. Saying that if you looked closely enough there would be a difference is deeply misleading (like saving claim no two snowflakes are identical by noting they all have different numbers of atoms) and testimony like that is how we got travesties like the FBI hair analysis scandal.

    As this is the second supposed fact in this video that’s relatively misleading. See the Wikipedia page about chalk outlines and cited data (short version: almost always just drawn for journalists or occasionally in non-murders but never a real accepted technique).

    Ok this is just a fun YouTube video that needs snappy answers but I hope in court he is more nuanced.

    • mijubo

      December 8, 2022 at 12:12 pm

      This needs more upvotes as even a lot of forensic experts turn a blind eye to it. In fact most claims on fingerprints are blatantly wrong. This does not mean it’s a good source of evidence but the science behind it is more than flaky.

  51. nkkalxs

    December 8, 2022 at 3:45 am

    been waiting for him to this for a long time!!

  52. Bryan Davis

    December 8, 2022 at 3:49 am

    Wow Matt, Wow!

  53. Common Scents

    December 8, 2022 at 4:44 am

    The amount of people who got away with murder is probably 100 – 1000 times the people who were falsely convicted.

    • 🆆ₕₐₜₛₐₚₚ ₘₑ+𝟙𝟠𝟘𝟚𝟟𝟟𝟚𝟘𝟘𝟟𝟞

      December 8, 2022 at 6:08 am

      I’d expect that you• HMU 🤙

  54. Engalla

    December 8, 2022 at 2:37 pm

    Look up graveballe manden if you what to know more about pitebork humans

  55. david alejandro

    December 8, 2022 at 4:59 pm

    So they ACTUALLY used to do the chalk outline? I always thought it was a movie trope.

  56. Jeremy Smith

    December 8, 2022 at 5:00 pm

    I have a question. Do you ever wash those crime scene evidence number things?

  57. rmp5s

    December 8, 2022 at 5:28 pm

    Repeal the gun control act.

  58. SomeAssemblyRequired

    December 8, 2022 at 5:40 pm

    Forensic science isn’t science. The CSI effect, where jurors believe in the objectivity of forensic results and convict innocent people, has been well-documented.

  59. Tuntuni Cartoon Bangla

    December 8, 2022 at 6:28 pm

    👈👈👈👈👈👈👈👈👈🙏🙏🙏

  60. P H

    December 8, 2022 at 7:21 pm

    As a former computer forensic specialist this was excellent!

    That magnifying glass analogy was a great example of “baffle them with bull 💩”

  61. Trini Traveler

    December 8, 2022 at 7:39 pm

    Serial killers taking notes right now 📝

  62. HostileHitman

    December 8, 2022 at 8:25 pm

    Hol up, where they sourcing these bodies for various situations? you tellin me they might have strapped grammy to a rocket and shot her at a wall?

  63. Matthew Popow

    December 8, 2022 at 8:29 pm

    Wow. I’ve only ever heard about the court side of the OJ case, never knew about the difficulty in the investigation stage. It was just a perfect storm of Bad.

  64. Antonio Pirone

    December 8, 2022 at 8:36 pm

    I could really just sit down and watch this for hours… idk why

  65. Goaltender Interference

    December 8, 2022 at 8:46 pm

    Goaltender Interference asks: How often do real forensic investigators arrive at a crime scene, put on their sunglasses, make a pun and scream like Pete Townshend?

    • Fliss Ann

      December 9, 2022 at 9:17 am

      I personally usually take off my sunglasses when arriving at a scene because then I can’t use my camera properly. It stays on my head though for quick access. No screams or puns though, sadly.

  66. Goh Jing Yi

    December 8, 2022 at 9:09 pm

    He looks like that guy that just plays music videos and points to them

  67. Szabolcs Muráth

    December 8, 2022 at 9:51 pm

    CXXIV is 124, just FYI.

  68. don't take this too seriously but...

    December 8, 2022 at 9:52 pm

    As always, at least half of murders are never solved, regardless of DNA.

  69. lowbudgetmic

    December 8, 2022 at 11:51 pm

    Terror Scene Investigations (T.S.I.) 😮

  70. 朱晓晨

    December 9, 2022 at 12:53 am

    Miss this guy a lot

  71. Joe Bonez

    December 9, 2022 at 12:59 am

    Very interesting. Thank you

  72. sp1dvr

    December 9, 2022 at 2:41 am

    as someone who wants to specialize in forensics, this is a video i’ve been dying to see and very happy it’s finally happened.

    • Andrew Payne

      December 10, 2022 at 8:24 pm

      Awesome. Hope you find guilty people and help innocent people

  73. Demon enjoys birthday cake

    December 9, 2022 at 6:20 am

    Druggist fold also great for crushing pills and securing said crushed powder then using the seam to pour without waste. Lil tidbit for y’all.

  74. Pimpernickel

    December 9, 2022 at 7:01 am

    Surprised about the oj question, not answers.

  75. Omar Guardado

    December 9, 2022 at 10:37 am

    interestingly enough many third world countries don’t have the money to install forensic labs/teams to be able to solve murders

  76. Snookbone

    December 9, 2022 at 1:56 pm

    Perhaps someone could forensically investigate where this guy’s sense of humour has gone

  77. Josh Nixon

    December 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm

    They’ve discovered every fingerprint is not unique. They have found some that are very very similar. Look what happened to Brandon Mayfield

  78. Benjamin of Houston

    December 9, 2022 at 7:09 pm

    On the unique fingerprint. It does happen that people are close enough to get false positives. In the Spain bombing case, there was a positive fingerprint match on someone in the states who had never been to Spain. If I recall correctly, it was determined they weren’t exactly identical, but they were so close that the automated detection had picked them up

  79. Sabrina Shelton

    December 9, 2022 at 7:47 pm

    I need to know more about the “stepfather burying the body in the backyard” case.

  80. Jack Makackov

    December 9, 2022 at 8:03 pm

    I have an uncle that had a murder charge that was only overturned because of DNA evidence. I guarantee he would have went to prison his entire life without DNA.

  81. Alex McD

    December 9, 2022 at 9:12 pm

    I wonder how universal access to this technology and training is. New York or fbi, sure. Rural towns in poorer states?

  82. J N

    December 10, 2022 at 12:17 am

    Whoever asked The first question….you’re stupid

  83. Charlie Chap

    December 10, 2022 at 2:01 am

    I think a more important question is how many people were convicted of a crime they didn’t commit before DNA.

  84. Alex Gravelle

    December 10, 2022 at 2:19 am

    Can we just respect the fact that he is impressive both professionally AND fashionably? He’s giving us a Thom Browne shirt!!

  85. themadvirus613

    December 10, 2022 at 3:01 am

    there is a rare case of people not having fingerprints. if you consider those people than there really is about 3,000 similar fingerprints. granted having two of those in the same room ( let alone both of them being suspects for the crime) is extremely rare, but it is possible.

  86. Katlego Teddy Mohale

    December 10, 2022 at 6:23 am

    On that fingerprint subject, my 1 year old son can open my phone using his finger. I’ve only set up my finger. Are kids a cheat code or is this just a huge coincidence?

    Ps he didn’t do it once. We have tested it over and over, and his finger works.

  87. Efrizaldi Affanda

    December 10, 2022 at 11:39 am

    Next up pleaase do Fragrance Support by a perfumer

  88. Haypovchik

    December 10, 2022 at 12:11 pm

    In God eyes, no one got away with thi.

  89. Myra Groenewegen

    December 10, 2022 at 4:55 pm

    You have to respect how this guy brings of the fallibility of forensic evidence and wrongful conviction of his own accord. He is careful not even to presume guilt for OJ Simpson. This is the forensic expert we want in the court room.

  90. Sophia Corinne

    December 10, 2022 at 5:21 pm

    Get a forensic anthropologist on here!! They handle the identification of skeletonized remains (when the body doesn’t have a face to ID them by) and finger prints

  91. Lori Wolfcat

    December 10, 2022 at 5:46 pm

    5:32 But forensic scientists Have confirmed that some fingerprints Are alike. There’s even been cases where they got the wrong man cuz of it. Maybe Now you can find more differences because of what he mentioned, but there were plenty of times when fingerprints Were the same. I’m wondering if maybe they look the same sometimes because of the pattern.

  92. Sarlat

    December 10, 2022 at 11:20 pm

    I wish someone asked a question regarding the mental toll of encountering some really gruesome and heartbreaking crime scenes on a regular basis. I appreciate what people in forensics do, but it would be my nightmare job for that reason. Curious on how they deal with it.

  93. Ashley Murphy

    December 11, 2022 at 12:45 am

    You can tell he testifies often by how simply he explains things. In forensics myself (drug analysis) and this was great!

  94. Birdtalon

    December 11, 2022 at 1:15 am

    Criminals watching this video taking notes.

  95. MegaManless

    December 11, 2022 at 1:56 am

    ah man, I was hoping the AI was called “Shots Fired”. Wasted opportunity.

  96. imacbookpro

    December 11, 2022 at 5:06 am

    Part 2, NOW!

  97. Evan Sherzad

    December 11, 2022 at 5:32 am

    I actually had the pleasure of working with Matt in the field, and he is a truly an expert on the subject matter and a genuine person.

  98. Vedesh

    December 11, 2022 at 5:38 am

    so much fun, its a crime

  99. David Milhous Carter

    December 11, 2022 at 5:41 am

    4:22 Technically, one can still buy fully automatic firearms.

  100. Alexander Robbinson, Phd.

    December 11, 2022 at 11:16 am

    Love this dude!

    • Grown-up Actress

      December 11, 2022 at 7:57 pm

      Yes, this dude is totally charming!

  101. George

    December 11, 2022 at 7:31 pm

    Ema Skye approves

  102. Link5020

    December 12, 2022 at 12:02 am

    Wait.. that guy drove round for 4 years and never took the pipe bombs out? xD

  103. Vee

    December 12, 2022 at 12:34 am

    Love this kinda episode!

  104. CYNCINNATI

    December 12, 2022 at 2:05 am

    as a forensics student who studies death investigation this was so slay i got spot on answers <3

  105. Rosanna Burt

    December 12, 2022 at 3:20 am

    Oj got off cuz he had one heck of a lawyer lol 😂

  106. CGH

    December 12, 2022 at 3:32 am

    Whoa! Slow down on the “druggist fold” that’s some complex stuff!

  107. Liz Kerr

    December 12, 2022 at 3:54 am

    Shout out to Paul Holes and everyone who solved the GSK crimes!

  108. Bagas

    December 12, 2022 at 9:24 am

    i’m here because i thought Viserys doing forensics now

  109. Kartika90 _

    December 12, 2022 at 12:58 pm

    I am amazed how technology advances are used in forensic fields like drones, laser imaging, AI, deep learning, etc… Maybe I have watched too many sci-fi dystopian fictions because all I can think about is machine taking over human but hearing stories of how these technologies are used in real life fields like forensics and medical making me not as scared

  110. Shand Nazer

    December 12, 2022 at 1:11 pm

    9:07 We used to call out the fire department and send a photographer up the ladder truck 😂

  111. Tania

    December 12, 2022 at 2:07 pm

    now I need anthropologist to talk about human

  112. David Pottage

    December 12, 2022 at 2:46 pm

    There have been several instances of false fingerprint matches leading to wrongful convictions. The best know are Shirley McKie, a Scottish policewoman, was
    prosecuted on the basis of a fingerprint match on the required sixteen points, she was able to prover her innocence in 2000, and Stephan Cowans who had been convicted of shooting a police officer in 1997 following a robbery, but was acquitted on appeal six years later after he argued that his print was a misidentification and saved up enough money to have the evidence tested for DNA. page 469

  113. Charlene B

    December 12, 2022 at 3:11 pm

    Cmon total clickbait ug

  114. Ramian1

    December 12, 2022 at 4:23 pm

    For those interested in bog bodies I suggest (warning dead person pictures) His head looks like he is just sleeping and he died 2300 years ago, he was even at the start mistaken for a recent murder victim.

  115. Sean Donohue

    December 12, 2022 at 10:52 pm

    ‘uman or non-‘uman

  116. Kipster

    December 13, 2022 at 1:51 am

    He looks a teensy tiny really small bit like james hetfield

  117. Karen Sierra

    December 13, 2022 at 2:32 am

    Bones lol

  118. Taryn Cole

    December 13, 2022 at 5:58 am

    The examining and testing of how bodies decompose that he’s talking about are called body farms. They are super cool and fun to learn about

  119. מֶלֶך הָעוֹלָם: Back For Blood

    December 13, 2022 at 6:45 am

    Yeah, a lot is made of the “exoneration” of the supposedly wrongfully convicted, while no one seems to care much about finding the actual perpetrators, much less re-examining cases of acquittals in cases of guilt, such as those in which the false exonerations are based on witnesses who knew they would be victims were they to come forward refusing to cooperate, which actually means that the perpetrators of the initial crimes might be more of a danger to the public than those that one is comfortable testifying against and having convicted.

  120. Simone Chèrie

    December 13, 2022 at 12:30 pm

    Why aren’t forensic sciences independently funded or operated? Isn’t government funding a conflict of interest?

    • Mr Ghost

      December 13, 2022 at 1:22 pm

      What? What do you mean?

  121. Andrew J

    December 13, 2022 at 3:06 pm

    With the OJ crime scene…the techs screwed up on gathering things. The police video taped them collecting it and they didn’t follow the proper methods. The defense called them on it, and the DA couldn’t do anything about it without “questioning” past cases, and taking the risk of reopening them. For example, one of the OJ’s experts was the “DNA expert” that taught LAPD crime lab what to do, and he said it wasn’t done right. It should have been up/down 2x, not the up/down..side by side. At that time, it was still so new that they didn’t know that up/down/side by side really didn’t make a difference.

  122. HouseMDaddict

    December 13, 2022 at 11:13 pm

    The amount of people that didn’t know it was “spatter” and not “splatter” have not paid attention to the rest of the video 🤣😂

  123. Rich McLaughlin

    December 13, 2022 at 11:58 pm

    “And if OJ really did it” lol

  124. Elin

    December 14, 2022 at 12:08 am

    Science is amazing

  125. Tony Lee

    December 14, 2022 at 12:17 am

    This is why I always carry a bit of my ex’s hair with me. If I have to commit a crime, the dna they find ain’t mine! (;

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Historian Answers Pirate Questions | Tech Support | WIRED

Historian Angus Konstam joins WIRED to answer the internet’s burning questions about pirates. Where did the stereotypical pirate accent come from? What did pirates do for fun? Why do we associate parrots and eyepatches with pirates? Who’s the most famous non-fictional pirate in history? Is Jack Sparrow real? Did pirates use sunscreen? Answers to these…

Published

on

Historian Angus Konstam joins WIRED to answer the internet’s burning questions about pirates. Where did the stereotypical pirate accent come from? What did pirates do for fun? Why do we associate parrots and eyepatches with pirates? Who’s the most famous non-fictional pirate in history? Is Jack Sparrow real? Did pirates use sunscreen? Answers to these questions and many more await on Pirate Support.

0:00 Pirate Support
0:13 The pirate accent
1:01 Pirates: Why?
1:36 The Pirate Code
2:10 Pirate pleasures
2:50 Peg legs
3:12 No-no-notorious
3:53 Pirate democracy
4:54 Walk the plank/Peter Pan
5:41 He’s the pauper of the surf, the jester of Tortuga
6:30 Gay pirates
6:59 Privateer vs Pirate
8:12 A little rum and a classic film
8:38 Women were pirates
10:05 Beginning a life of piracy
10:40 SPF Arrrr
10:59 Have we found any treasure?
11:53 Pirate life expectancy
12:19 But why all the parrots
12:37 The beard sounds extremely memorable
13:04 Pirate wear
14:09 Pirate weaponry
15:21 Pirate ships
16:08 Pirates attacked slave ships
17:21 The skull and crossbones flag
17:53 When nature called
18:15 Where was home for a pirate?
19:03 Also, why all the eyepatches?

Thank you to Osprey Publishing for kind permission to use several of their images in this video. You can discover more in these great books:
Pirates 1660-1730:
Pirate: The Golden Age:
The Pirate Menace:

Director: Anna O’Donohue
Director of Photography: Mateo Notsuke
Editor: Richard Trammell
Expert: Angus Konstam
Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Brandon White; Jasmine Breinburg
Production Manager: Peter Brunette
Production Coordinator: Rhyan Lark
Casting Producer: Nicholas Sawyer
Camera Operator: Cameron Hall
Gaffer: Jake Newell
Sound Mixer: Michael Panayiotis
Post Production Supervisor: Christian Olguin
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Additional Editor: Paul Tael
Assistant Editor: Billy Ward

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Dune: Prophecy’ Cast Answer The 50 Most Googled Dune Questions | WIRED

“Dune: Prophecy” stars Jade Anouka, Jessica Barden, Josh Heuston, Chloe Lea, and Chris Mason visit WIRED to answer the 50 most googled questions about Dune. When does “Dune: Prophecy” take place? Which character is credited with the quote “He who controls the spice controls the universe”? What do the Fremen of Arrakis wear to retain…

Published

on

“Dune: Prophecy” stars Jade Anouka, Jessica Barden, Josh Heuston, Chloe Lea, and Chris Mason visit WIRED to answer the 50 most googled questions about Dune. When does “Dune: Prophecy” take place? Which character is credited with the quote “He who controls the spice controls the universe”? What do the Fremen of Arrakis wear to retain body moisture? Why does Dune and its related works have so many Arabic words? And is Paul Atreides ultimately the villain in Dune? Hear answers to these questions and many more as the cast of “Dune: Prophecy” answer the most googled questions about Frank Herbert’s seminal science fiction opus.

Director: Justin Wolfson
Director of Photography: Constantine Economides
Editor: Daniel Poler
Talent: Jade Anouka; Jessica Barden; Josh Heuston; Chloe Lea; Chris Mason
Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Brandon White
Production Manager: Peter Brunette
Production Coordinator: Rhyan Lark
Talent Booker: Lauren Mendoza
Camera Operator: Christopher Eustache; Caleb Weiss
Sound Mixer: Sean Paulsen
Production Assistant: Sonia Butt
Post Production Supervisor: Christian Olguin
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Additional Editor: Jason Malizia
Assistant Editor: Billy Ward

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Selena Gomez & Zoe Saldaña Answer The Web’s Most Searched Questions | WIRED

Selena Gomez and Zoe Saldaña, stars of the 2024 film “Emilia Pérez,” visit WIRED to answer their most searched for questions on Google. Where is Selena Gomez from? Is she friends with her “Only Murders In The Building” co-star Steve Martin? Can Selena Gomez speak Spanish? When did Zoe Saldaña get married? Who does she…

Published

on

Selena Gomez and Zoe Saldaña, stars of the 2024 film “Emilia Pérez,” visit WIRED to answer their most searched for questions on Google. Where is Selena Gomez from? Is she friends with her “Only Murders In The Building” co-star Steve Martin? Can Selena Gomez speak Spanish? When did Zoe Saldaña get married? Who does she play in the “Guardians Of The Galaxy” films? What sunglasses does Zoe Saldaña wear? Answers to these questions and many more await on the WIRED Autocomplete Interview of Selena Gomez & Zoe Saldaña.

EMILIA PÉREZ is available now on Netflix,

Director: Justin Wolfson
Director of Photography: Constantine Economides
Editor: Cory Stevens
Talent: Selena Gomez; Zoe Saldana
Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Brandon White; Paul Gulyas
Production Manager: Peter Brunette
Production Coordinator: Rhyan Lark
Talent Booker: Meredith Judkins
Camera Operator: Jeremy Harris
Sound Mixer: Rebecca O’Neill
Production Assistant: Kalia Simms; JasmineSkyy Forcer
Post Production Supervisor: Christian Olguin
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larse
Additional Editor: Jason Malizia
Assistant Editor: Billy Ward

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Trending