Connect with us

Entertainment

Physicist Brian Greene Answers Quantum Physics Questions

Theoretical physicist Professor Brian Greene joins WIRED to answer the internet’s burning quantum physics questions. Is String Theory dead? Is our universe the only universe? What happens after the universe dies? Answers to these questions and many more await on Quantum Physics Support. WIRED recommends: Watch more from WIRED | Tech Support: #BrianGreene #Physics #StringTheory…

Published

on

Theoretical physicist Professor Brian Greene joins WIRED to answer the internet’s burning quantum physics questions. Is String Theory dead? Is our universe the only universe? What happens after the universe dies? Answers to these questions and many more await on Quantum Physics Support.

WIRED recommends:

Watch more from WIRED | Tech Support:

#BrianGreene #Physics #StringTheory

00:00 – Quantum Physics Support
00:25 – We both do and don’t understand quantum physics
01:00 – Bending the fabric of space-time, one A4 sheet at a time
01:59 – Doors are for people with too much energy
03:05 – Infinite universes, same high taxes
05:01 – Just channel the lightning into the Flux Capacitor
06:22 – Beam me up, Scotty
07:11 – The ingredients of space and time
08:27 – Newton walked so quantum physics could make it weird
09:39 – Entering the void, back never
10:38 – Quantum superposition, until you look at me
11:23 – It’s my birthday, but also my birth day
12:17 – String theory: understanding gravity, one dimension at a time
13:12 – First, there was nothing. Then, nothing observed itself
15:01 – Computing 0’s and 1’s simultaneously is risky business
16:25 – Defying Einstein via “”spooky action at a distance”
17:30 – Schrödinger’s cat
19:08 – Don’t look at me, you’re changing my probability distribution
20:08 – Boundless energy on a microscopic scale
21:11 – General relativity 🤝 quantum mechanics
22:28 – How did something come from nothing?
23:35 – Until the end of time…

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Uncanny Valley podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
76 Comments

76 Comments

  1. @adams0020

    August 4, 2026 at 5:21 pm

    The editor sure had fun labeling the timestamps lol

  2. @Sawyer-x9n

    August 4, 2026 at 5:22 pm

    If Brian Greene ever sees this, I just want to say thank you.

    Earlier this year, I became interested in physics. I read many books on the subject, and then I discovered Brian Greene and started watching interviews with some of the world’s greatest physicists.

    I’ve learned so much thanks to the incredible value and knowledge you’ve shared with the public.

    Thank you so much. ..

    • @KhaoticComrade

      August 4, 2026 at 5:57 pm

      bot

  3. @Koooo4

    August 4, 2026 at 5:27 pm

    12:19 You can tell by his answer that he has personally invested a lot of his career into string theory and is very desperate for it to not be a waste of time lol

  4. @martinth972

    August 4, 2026 at 5:51 pm

    Brilliant scientist but his answers have all been so dumbed down this video is essentially misinformation and nonsense.

  5. @pnjodaro

    August 4, 2026 at 5:55 pm

    Wired, PLEASE make more videos with Experts in different fields. I absolutely love it and I don’t wanna run out of content 😭 Thanks for doing this

  6. @k_a_bizzle

    August 4, 2026 at 5:58 pm

    Seeing Brian Greene do the infamous pencil-through-paper explanation is now checked off my bucket list.

  7. @obaz91

    August 4, 2026 at 6:26 pm

    MY KING. MY MUSE. MY CRUSH. MY PRECIOUS LORD. BRAIN GREENE. <3

  8. @Little_moz

    August 4, 2026 at 6:30 pm

    Wow, I just realised how time dilation would sound to people who don’t understand what it is 😂

  9. @LoveOPugsley

    August 4, 2026 at 6:33 pm

    You can think about Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle much like the special order menu that you find in certain Chinese restaurants where you have dishes in column A and other dishes in column B, and if you order the first dish in column A you can’t order the corresponding dish in column B; that’s sort of like the Uncertainty Principle.

  10. @uncletiggermclaren7592

    August 4, 2026 at 6:43 pm

    Physicists explaining *Block Theory* : “To start with, Just give me these ten assumptions as if they are axiomatic. I can’t prove them, but I assert them. OK ?. Ready ? THERE, I proved it !. Everything is predetermined !.”

  11. @keaton718

    August 4, 2026 at 6:53 pm

    10:40 it’s important to note with the double slit experiment, it may be an electron before it’s fired and when it lands, but it travels as a wave, and in fact an electron *is* a wave so the electron waiting to be fired is a localised wave and when it’s fired through the slits it is a spread out wave, so with a spread out wave fired at two slits you should expect an interference pattern. With all the variations on the experiment, like the 2000 atom sized molecule where the interference pattern is also seen, that molecule is also a “matter-wave” in transit. Y’all are all being lied to about what this experiment is meant to show and some pop physicists seem happy to let you believe the lie.

  12. @BalloonMerchant

    August 4, 2026 at 7:02 pm

    Assus Reamus made me laugh 3:26

  13. @seeitfixit

    August 4, 2026 at 7:05 pm

    You guys got the wrong Brian.

  14. @timz9862

    August 4, 2026 at 7:22 pm

    It’s amazing to me that people like Isaac Newton, who lived hundreds of years ago, could make calculations and predictions about things that we still know our true today and they didn’t have any kind of computers. I think computers are actually making people dumber.

  15. @TheSkinnyZ

    August 4, 2026 at 7:54 pm

    Omfg! 2:09 I asked more or less this exact same question to my physics teacher back in the day and ever since I occasionally think about the possibility of falling through my bed while sleeping. 😂

  16. @TimBee100

    August 4, 2026 at 8:01 pm

    Science fiction.

  17. @ronaldocost4

    August 4, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    I didn’t understand anything, so, according to science, I’m on the right path.

  18. @TimBee100

    August 4, 2026 at 8:22 pm

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

  19. @Wowreally42

    August 4, 2026 at 8:26 pm

    Can we get a 4 hour long part two? Please and thank you

  20. @TheOutdoorVoice

    August 4, 2026 at 8:26 pm

    My theory combines aspects of particle theory and string theory. I believe an electron produces ripples that radiate outward through spacetime, similar to waves spreading across a pond. The frequency of these spacetime ripples may determine the amount of mass the particle can possess. One way I think this idea might be demonstrated is through the double-slit experiment. When a single electron is fired toward two slits, the ripples surrounding the electron could pass through both openings and interfere with one another on the opposite side. The electron itself would then follow the resulting spacetime geometry created by that interference.

  21. @OrnellaRodriguez

    August 4, 2026 at 8:38 pm

    <3

  22. @alef_19

    August 4, 2026 at 8:45 pm

    Te amo Brian ❤

  23. @lowbudgetmic

    August 4, 2026 at 8:46 pm

    Hard science 🧬 😮😮😮

  24. @maxbrilliant72

    August 4, 2026 at 8:53 pm

    I didn’t listen to what he was saying. I just talked to ChatGPT the whole time.

  25. @fretzl

    August 4, 2026 at 9:19 pm

    physicists’ interpretations of schrodinger’s cat are so much more varied than how he presents it here as an undisputed fact. like literally just look at the wikipedia page. that felt so poorly answered

  26. @sinematographers3344

    August 5, 2026 at 1:59 pm

    The comments reveal a large Brian Greene appreciation and warm sentiment.
    If he was to write a book titled “Making love with Brian” i would be the first to make that purchase.

  27. @randallpetersen9164

    August 5, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    His wormhole ‘discussion’ was wholely inadequate, unimpressive, disappointing.

  28. @djmixamor

    August 5, 2026 at 2:21 pm

    what a joke 😂😂😂😂😂

  29. @randallpetersen9164

    August 5, 2026 at 2:26 pm

    The block universe creates a massive existential crisis because, if real, it completely eliminates the illusion of free will.
    What you did was always going to be done, and what you’re going to do, can’t be changed.

  30. @Scixxy

    August 5, 2026 at 2:27 pm

    That north pole analogy is great! I feel better now!

  31. @randallpetersen9164

    August 5, 2026 at 2:29 pm

    Love he won’t admit that string theory is dead, but then says that everything about it is untestable. Brian, you should know as well as anyone, if it’s not testable, it’s not science, it’s fantasy.

  32. @randallpetersen9164

    August 5, 2026 at 2:33 pm

    The only thing quantum computers will be used for is breaking encryption and causing extreme chaos around the world. You know this is true, why not just admit it?

  33. @randallpetersen9164

    August 5, 2026 at 2:44 pm

    He should have discussed how relativity may vary depending on the region of space under consideration. Timescape cosmology. Standard model need not apply everywhere.

  34. @ethanhetzler2767

    August 5, 2026 at 2:45 pm

    So how can he claim that observation/measurement has such a big effect on a system and what it does without knowing how the system behaves without observation

  35. @randallpetersen9164

    August 5, 2026 at 2:49 pm

    It’s got to be frustrating dealing with some of these questions. Come on, people! Physicists aren’t deities.

  36. @Zardwark

    August 5, 2026 at 2:50 pm

    I’ve read a good few of Brian’s books and they are very good. But it’s always bothered me the early universe was a black hole, then it wasn’t. because of Voodoo.

  37. @IncoGnito-ji5du

    August 5, 2026 at 3:43 pm

    What about the other colours of Brian?

  38. @durantan2343

    August 5, 2026 at 3:50 pm

    my brain hurts watching this

  39. @danielstone869

    August 5, 2026 at 4:11 pm

    Science: I choose you Pikachu. Brian Greene: Who’s Pikachu? Internet: Me: You are, Brian Greene. To be clear, you are. 🐣

  40. @rassman48

    August 5, 2026 at 4:22 pm

    However, the universe is vast, there are few places you can get to that would be useful. So even if there is such a thing as a wormhole outside of a black hole where time and space are warped, then these are very unlikely to be a means of travel that could ever be used.

    An AI version of my response is
    “Even if wormholes exist in nature, the conditions required to make them stable and traversable are far beyond anything we can achieve. And because the universe is so vast, any naturally occurring wormhole would likely connect to regions that are inaccessible or useless for travel. So while wormholes are mathematically interesting, they’re very unlikely to ever become a practical means of transportation”.

  41. @paullenoue8173

    August 5, 2026 at 4:56 pm

    As a test of how much I understood quantum physics, I paused the video after the questions, thought up an answer, then played the video to see how much I got wrong. Ended up getting all them in a range of 50% to 95% correct. Cool!

  42. @Mainestreamer

    August 5, 2026 at 6:09 pm

    That analogy with the bending paper is irrelevant. How would someone bend all sace and everything in it.

  43. @rossbooth4635

    August 5, 2026 at 6:54 pm

    I’m going to have to steal his analogy that asking “what was before the big bang” is equivalent to asking “what’s north of the north pole”.

  44. @angrycandy5441

    August 5, 2026 at 7:13 pm

    Spoilers: Wormholes don’t exist, no matter how many pencils we poke through paper.

  45. @zzrr933

    August 5, 2026 at 7:36 pm

    For me he’s the best science communicator

  46. @subtlefeatures1087

    August 5, 2026 at 8:01 pm

    Joe Rogan just had Andrew Wilson on……..Could have had this dude.

  47. @matthewjuhlin4628

    August 5, 2026 at 8:24 pm

    Wormholes totally exist. You just need negative energy. Like half a universe’s worth.

  48. @briangoldberg4439

    August 5, 2026 at 9:05 pm

    Oh no. He’s a string theory nut.

  49. @droouu

    August 5, 2026 at 9:05 pm

    This is the greats series. WIRED also manages to get the perfect people.

  50. @danesthesia09

    August 5, 2026 at 9:17 pm

    Big up to Wired, and big up to this gentleman. Both my parents were college professors, and this man’s INCREDIBLY DEEP comprehension of his science and clear dedication to making it non-insultingly understandable would make them proud.

    I’m glad I spent my time on this YT video, and that is a rare event for me.

  51. @David-r9e3w

    August 6, 2026 at 9:24 am

    QM classicalised in 2009 Forgotten Physics website uncovered the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schroedinger, Heisenberg, Planck, Einstein, Bohr, Bohm and Penrose and all the rest including ‘Brain’. Shameless clueless pretenders.

  52. @zeeboy87

    August 6, 2026 at 9:34 am

    Carbon cosmic melanin 666 neutrons protons and electrons creation of everything

  53. @jeffwashburn73

    August 6, 2026 at 9:53 am

    So I am immortal. Nice.

  54. @brianfunaki2602

    August 6, 2026 at 10:45 am

    Professor Greene – How does it feel to be a physics Superstar? You post a Q&A and one day later over one hundred thousand human beings have watched your video to learn science but more importantly to try to figure out how it all began and the purpose of existence (if there even is one). By the way when does your next book come out? 🙂

  55. @FarhanaLovie

    August 6, 2026 at 11:07 am

    Maybe time needs an observer? Without an observer time can’t be counted.

  56. @BasBleu02

    August 6, 2026 at 11:22 am

    When I listen to Prof. Greene, I feel as though my grasp of quantum mechanics mirrors Schrödinger’s poor cat. It’s alive, no it’s dead.

  57. @cristinapopescu3639

    August 6, 2026 at 11:34 am

    What clicked for me better than the piece of paper analogy in understanding wormholes was a video of a river with a whirl with one end on a side of the bridge and the other on the other side o the bridge

  58. @skullpoker69

    August 6, 2026 at 12:00 pm

    You got the crackpot to do this? String theory is the only game in town because it’s only a game. Next time, get someone who does actual science.

  59. @edpolax

    August 6, 2026 at 12:28 pm

    If 8.3 billion people all simultaneously bump a wall at the same time for X number of times, would that increase the probability of atleast one person to pass through the wall?

  60. @MarkDeAutremont-g3e

    August 6, 2026 at 12:53 pm

    Your opinion on hybrid bond crosstalk?

  61. @Zado19

    August 6, 2026 at 1:23 pm

    This guy is alright on Startalk when Neil and Chuck are there to rein him in and follow up, but here im lost. These feel like quarter answers patched together

  62. @KevinWendigo63

    August 6, 2026 at 1:28 pm

    18:00 The concept is actually much simpler: Schrodinger had two wives. Each had a cat. Schrodinger found a way to get rid of both cats.

  63. @intraum

    August 6, 2026 at 1:45 pm

    you can put a pencil through folded paper, but can you jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace?

  64. @tb.abad9091

    August 6, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    7:19 But then everything changed when the fire nation attacked.

  65. @TheOnlyName

    August 6, 2026 at 4:03 pm

    The thought that before The Big Bang maybe nothing ever happened is crazy to think about

  66. @Liammac1878

    August 6, 2026 at 4:45 pm

    “String theory”
    “Enormous strides”
    Atta boy sheldon

  67. @jamielacourse7578

    August 6, 2026 at 5:08 pm

    I like Brian. I don’t sense any arrogance like some other scientists.

  68. @reymisterio1386

    August 6, 2026 at 6:03 pm

    I could listen to.brian greene and Neil Degrasse Tyson all day and never get bored

  69. @MitchRaemsch

    August 6, 2026 at 6:25 pm

    Einstein stopped believing in wormholes as they violate local causality. Bells Inequality has a missing link that demotes them as evidence for action at a distance. QM overlooked it. QM tunnels? You can’t see a particle you can’t see one tunnel. They are also non local aether order Einstein never believed QM.

  70. @KayN1989

    August 6, 2026 at 6:33 pm

    The absolute best 25 minutes of my life

  71. @fallios

    August 6, 2026 at 7:20 pm

    Please Brian Cox

  72. @gravity_lover

    August 6, 2026 at 7:29 pm

    ending the video on a high note i see

  73. @PP-ky2ji

    August 6, 2026 at 8:26 pm

    They dont

  74. @WTIM-TV13

    August 6, 2026 at 8:53 pm

    A straw would be a better example of a wormhole than a pencil.

  75. @simon199418

    August 6, 2026 at 8:58 pm

    This guy needs to do something more meaningful with his life. Like for example, reading to the elderly. But not his books, something they might enjoy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Yes, Physics Says You Can Run Through a Wall

Theoretical physicist Professor Brian Greene joins WIRED to answer the internet’s burning quantum physics questions. Is String Theory dead? Is our universe the only universe? What happens after the universe dies? Answers to these questions and many more await on Quantum Physics Support. #BrianGreene #Physics #StringTheory Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►► Listen…

Published

on

Theoretical physicist Professor Brian Greene joins WIRED to answer the internet’s burning quantum physics questions. Is String Theory dead? Is our universe the only universe? What happens after the universe dies? Answers to these questions and many more await on Quantum Physics Support.

#BrianGreene #Physics #StringTheory

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Uncanny Valley podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

The Odyssey’s Tom Holland Realizes a Flaw in His Performance

WIRED tasks Matt Damon (Odysseus), Anne Hathaway (Penelope), Tom Holland (Telemachus) and Robert Pattinson (Antinous) to answer the 50 most searched questions about _The Odyssey._ Whether it’s 10 minutes or 10 years, Odysseus gets there in the end. #TheOdyssey #Odysseus #Homer Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►► Listen to the Uncanny Valley podcast…

Published

on

WIRED tasks Matt Damon (Odysseus), Anne Hathaway (Penelope), Tom Holland (Telemachus) and Robert Pattinson (Antinous) to answer the 50 most searched questions about _The Odyssey._ Whether it’s 10 minutes or 10 years, Odysseus gets there in the end.

#TheOdyssey #Odysseus #Homer

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Uncanny Valley podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Tom Holland: “She’s Married to Me”

WIRED tasks Matt Damon (Odysseus), Anne Hathaway (Penelope), Tom Holland (Telemachus) and Robert Pattinson (Antinous) to answer the 50 most searched questions about _The Odyssey._ Whether it’s 10 minutes or 10 years, Odysseus gets there in the end. #TheOdyssey #Odysseus #Homer Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►► Listen to the Uncanny Valley podcast…

Published

on

WIRED tasks Matt Damon (Odysseus), Anne Hathaway (Penelope), Tom Holland (Telemachus) and Robert Pattinson (Antinous) to answer the 50 most searched questions about _The Odyssey._ Whether it’s 10 minutes or 10 years, Odysseus gets there in the end.

#TheOdyssey #Odysseus #Homer

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►►
Listen to the Uncanny Valley podcast ►►
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►►

Follow WIRED:
Instagram ►►
Twitter ►►
Facebook ►►
Tik Tok ►►

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized.

Continue Reading

Trending