Connect with us

People & Blogs

How to have constructive conversations | Julia Dhar

Visit to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more. “We need to figure out how we go into conversations not looking for the victory, but the progress,” says world debate champion Julia Dhar. In this practical talk, she shares three essential features of productive disagreements grounded in curiosity…

Published

on

Visit to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.

“We need to figure out how we go into conversations not looking for the victory, but the progress,” says world debate champion Julia Dhar. In this practical talk, she shares three essential features of productive disagreements grounded in curiosity and purpose. The end result? Constructive conversations that sharpen your argument and strengthen your relationships.

The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world’s leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You’re welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know.

Become a TED Member:
Follow TED on Twitter:
Like TED on Facebook:
Subscribe to our channel:

TED’s videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy (). For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at

Transcriber:

Three planes, 25 hours, 10,000 miles.

My dad gets off a flight from Australia
with one thing in mind

and it’s not a snack or a shower or a nap.

It’s November 2016

and Dad is here to talk to Americans
about the election.

Now, Dad’s a news fiend, but for him,

this is not just red or blue,
swing states or party platforms.

He has some really specific intentions.

He wants to listen,
be heard and understand.

And over two weeks,
he has hundreds of conversations

with Americans from
New Hampshire to Miami.

Some of them are tough conversations,

complete differences of opinions,

wildly different worldviews,

radically opposite life experiences.

But in all of those interactions,

Dad walks away
with a big smile on his face

and so does the other person.

You can see one of them here.

And in those interactions,

he’s having a version
of what it seems like we have less of,

but want more of —

a constructive conversation.

We have more ways than ever to connect.

And yet, politically, ideologically,

it feels like we are further
and further apart.

We tell pollsters that we want
politicians who are open-minded.

And yet when they change
their point of view,

we say that they lacked conviction.

For us, when we’re confronted
with information

that challenges an existing worldview,

our tendency is not to open up,
it’s to double down.

We even have a term for it
in social psychology.

It’s called belief perseverance.

And boy, do some people’s beliefs
seem to persevere.

I’m no stranger to tough conversations.

I got my start in what I now call
productive disagreement

in high school debate.

I even went on to win

the World Schools Debate
Championship three times.

I’ve been in a lot of arguments,
is what I’m saying,

but it took watching my dad
on the streets of the US

to understand
that we need to figure out

how we go into conversations.

Not looking for the victory,
but the progress.

And so since November 2016,
that’s what I’ve been doing.

Working with governments,
foundations, corporations, families,

to uncover the tools and techniques

that allow us to talk when it feels
like the divide is unbridgeable.

And constructive conversations
that really move the dialogue forward

have these same three essential features.

First, at least one party
in the conversation

is willing to choose curiosity over clash.

They’re open to the idea
that the discussion is a climbing wall,

not a cage fight,

that they’ll make progress over time

and are able to anchor all of that
in purpose of the discussion.

For someone trained in formal debate,

it is so tempting to run headlong
at the disagreement.

In fact, we call that clash

and in formal argumentation,

it’s a punishable offense
if there’s not enough of it.

But I’ve noticed,
you’ve probably noticed, too,

that in real life that tends
to make people shut down,

not just from the conversation,

but even from the relationship.

It’s actually one of the causes
of unfriending, online and off.

So instead, you might consider a technique

made popular by the Hollywood
producer Brian Grazer,

the curiosity conversation.

And the whole point
of a curiosity conversation

is to understand
the other person’s perspective,

to see what’s on their side of the fence.

And so the next time

that someone says something
you instinctively disagree with,

that you react violently to,

you only need one sentence
and one question:

“I never thought about it
exactly that way before.

What can you share
that would help me see what you see?”

What’s remarkable
about curiosity conversations

is that the people you are curious about
tend to become curious about you.

Whether it’s a friendly
Australian gentleman,

a political foe or a corporate rival,

they begin to wonder
what it is that you see

and whether they could see it to.

Constructive conversations
aren’t a one-shot deal.

If you go into an encounter
expecting everyone to walk out

with the same point of view
that you walked in with,

there’s really no chance for progress.

Instead, we need to think
about conversations as a climbing wall

to do a variant of what
my dad did during this trip,

pocketing a little nugget
of information here,

adapting his approach there.

That’s actually a technique
borrowed from formal debate

where you present an idea,

it’s attacked and you adapt
and re-explain,

it’s attacked again,

you adapt and re-explain.

The whole expectation
is that your idea gets better

through challenge and criticism.

And the evidence from really high-stakes
international negotiations

suggests that that’s what successful
negotiators do as well.

They go into conversations

expecting to learn from the challenges
that they will receive

to use objections to make their ideas
and proposals better.

Development is in some way a service
that we can do for others

and that others can do for us.

It makes the ideas sharper,

but the relationships warmer.

Curiosity can be relationship magic

and development can be
rocket fuel for your ideas.

But there are some situations

where it just feels
like it’s not worth the bother.

And in those cases

it can be because the purpose
of the discussion isn’t clear.

I think back to how my dad
went into those conversations

with a really clear sense of purpose.

He was there to learn, to listen,
to share his point of view.

And once that purpose
is understood by both parties,

then you can begin to move on.

Lay out our vision for the future.

Make a decision.

Get funding.

Then you can move on to principles.

When people shared with my dad
their hopes for America,

that’s where they started
with the big picture,

not with personality
or politics or policies.

Because inadvertently
they were doing something

that we do naturally with outsiders

and find it really difficult sometimes
to do with insiders.

They painted in broad strokes

before digging into the details.

But maybe you live in the same
zip code or the same house

and it feels like none
of that common ground is there today.

Then you might consider a version
of disagreement time travel,

asking your counterpart to articulate
what kind of neighborhood, country,

world, community,

they want a year from now,

a decade from now.

It is very tempting
to dwell in present tensions

and get bogged down in practicalities.

Inviting people to inhabit
a future possibility

opens up the chance
of a conversation with purpose.

Earlier in my career,

I worked for the deputy
prime minister of New Zealand

who practiced a version of this technique.

New Zealand’s electoral system
is designed for unlikely friendships,

coalitions, alliances,

memoranda of understanding
are almost inevitable.

And this particular government set-up
had some of almost everything —

small government conservatives, liberals,

the Indigenous people’s party,
the Green Party.

And I recently asked him,

what does it take to bring
a group like that together

but hold them together?

He said, “Someone, you,
has to take responsibility

for reminding them
of their shared purpose:

caring for people.”

If we are more focused
on what makes us different than the same,

then every debate is a fight.

If we put our challenges
and our problems before us,

then every potential ally
becomes an adversary.

But as my dad packed his bags
for the three flights, 25 hours,

10,000 miles back to Australia,

he was also packing a collection
of new perspectives,

a new way of navigating conversations,

and a whole set of new stories
and experiences to share.

But he was also leaving those behind

with everyone that he’d interacted with.

We love unlikely friendships
when they look like this.

We’ve just forgotten how to make them.

And amid the cacophony of cable news

and the awkwardness of family dinners,

and the hostility of corporate meetings,

each of us has this —

the opportunity
to walk into every encounter,

like my dad walked off that plane,

to choose curiosity over clash,

to expect development
of your ideas through discussion

and to anchor in common purpose.

That’s what really
world-class persuaders do

to build constructive conversations

and move them forward.

It’s how our world will move forward too.

Thank you.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
74 Comments

74 Comments

  1. svnelvn

    April 9, 2021 at 6:08 am

    Damn, she’s smart and beautiful

  2. FLEXCOPE INC.

    April 9, 2021 at 6:25 am

    Listen more. And shut up when asked.

  3. Black Flame

    April 9, 2021 at 7:02 am

    I have convos with my coworkers all the time about politics, religion, spirituality, race and gender issues, etc. I’ve learned to listen to them and try to move the conversations in a productive way, by challenging why they believe that way and what experiences led to their eventual conclusion. Often times we both realize we are unequipped with the right data points to make certain conclusions. Even then, there will be times when one party does not budge on their belief even when the adequate facts and logic is presented to them. They don’t want their reality shattered. Human emotion is tricky to circumvent. Even logic and facts don’t change the way people want to believe certain things.

  4. Alias

    April 9, 2021 at 8:20 am

    No political or religious conversations. Just stick to shallow things like the weather.

  5. fpwu

    April 9, 2021 at 8:53 am

    Sounds great! Now, if you seek and find progress in a conversation, and the other side on that same occasion seeks, finds and exerts victory – and enjoys the benefits, to your disadvantage… From a broader perspective: Is that progress?

  6. Darker Twelve

    April 9, 2021 at 9:01 am

    go back to kitchen

  7. abc

    April 9, 2021 at 9:39 am

    Twitter users need to see this

  8. EighteenXVIII

    April 9, 2021 at 9:45 am

    Cathy Newman needs to watch this

  9. ファーリアイ・ヌル・

    April 9, 2021 at 9:50 am

    Mostly it’s not a conversation, more like an argument. People just wanted to win the argument but not to find the common ground.

  10. Operative This is the way

    April 9, 2021 at 11:47 am

    I can see this lady’s husband losing every argument with her.

  11. micger

    April 9, 2021 at 12:00 pm

    amazing! Marry me?

  12. Lost Avatar

    April 9, 2021 at 12:20 pm

    Awesome speach and it should be used against the cancel culture and censorship ideologies currently taking centre stage.

  13. NVG 2022

    April 9, 2021 at 12:40 pm

    she so pretty

  14. Niel Malan

    April 9, 2021 at 12:48 pm

    Teaching traditional debating techniques in school is practically child abuse.

  15. Will Budic

    April 9, 2021 at 4:43 pm

    Don’t get an dual lipa from NATO
    They are arseholes in XANADU,
    don’t care for US, AU or UK, and Norther Ireland
    Xanadu | Olivia Newton-John & Gene Kelly’s ’80s/’40s Hybrid E.L.O. Roller Disco

  16. Leo M

    April 9, 2021 at 4:57 pm

    { destruct, variables } = construct ?? conversations

  17. Screamifyoumeanit

    April 9, 2021 at 6:27 pm

    That’s quite lovely…

  18. Ilya Shmakov

    April 10, 2021 at 2:08 am

    Given the results of 2016 elections, the technique didn’t really work well for her dad…

  19. Jones BBQ & Footmassage

    April 10, 2021 at 2:45 am

    Can we just say, how cute she is

  20. Fish Bangla TV

    April 10, 2021 at 9:15 am

    Beautiful Content

  21. Top of the World

    April 10, 2021 at 1:06 pm

    Her words are as beautiful as her looks.

    • crypto Hulk

      April 11, 2021 at 2:37 am

      ~i ~n~ v~ e~ s~ ~t~ i~n~ B~T~C ~$~ ~E~T~H~~
      ~~W~~h~~a~~~~s~~a~~p~~p~~
      +~4~4 ~7~8~6~8~6~9~0~1~0~5

  22. Smi Co

    April 10, 2021 at 2:20 pm

    This was kind of weird to watch…she looks like 28 and sounds like 52

    • Henrik J

      April 12, 2021 at 10:21 am

      We do exist. 28 myself. We usually feel that we have too much insight and knowledge for our age, but try to make the best of it. Completely understand if it feels weird. Just curious, did you think that it made it difficult to consider the message of the talk?

  23. Mykhailo Vasylenko

    April 10, 2021 at 3:35 pm

    I can barely concentrate on the information she is saying because of her beauty.

    • Joseph Jay Barrera

      April 11, 2021 at 5:32 am

      Yes! haha me too!!!!!

  24. Michael Epstein

    April 10, 2021 at 7:14 pm

    Step 1: Be a Human Being.

    • Michael Epstein

      April 10, 2021 at 7:14 pm

      To be Human does not take time.

      It is not of time. It is not the result of time or the things of time.

      It is not the result of any process.

      It is not the result of any method, ritual, or diet.

      It is not the result of any chemical.

      There is no path to it.

      It happens effortlessly and choicelessly…faster than the speed of light.

      Moreover, it is once and for all, now and forever.

    • Michael Epstein

      April 10, 2021 at 7:15 pm

      i created Jacob’s Ladder to help people be Human. Takes less than 90 minutes.

  25. kibrekidusan mequanint

    April 10, 2021 at 8:56 pm

    It’s so damn good

  26. Sandra Barbs

    April 11, 2021 at 2:30 am

    Investing in crypto is the only big chance of making money. For real crypto is profitable. Crypto is the new gold

    • Sarah jack

      April 11, 2021 at 2:32 am

      I wanted to trade Crypto but got confused by the fluctuations in price

  27. RUSCA TV

    April 11, 2021 at 5:19 am

    O seven gönlüne kurban olayım

  28. Yaha

    April 11, 2021 at 10:41 am

    True..The true spirit of conversation consists in building another man’s observation

  29. LaShawn

    April 11, 2021 at 6:40 pm

    Checking in from the DMV

  30. Andre Alforque

    April 11, 2021 at 11:17 pm

    Unlikely friendships: Jon Stewart and John McCain (when he was The Maverick).

  31. BluryFace

    April 12, 2021 at 3:59 am

    your tongue is yellow !

  32. Gerald Miller

    April 12, 2021 at 9:01 am

    Antifa physically attacks anyone voicing a different opinion.

  33. Henrik J

    April 12, 2021 at 10:15 am

    Amazing talk and advice that cannot be given too many times! Thank you!

  34. Jacky

    April 12, 2021 at 11:18 am

    1. Curiosity over clash – “I never thought about it like that before”
    2. Your ideas become better through challenge

  35. Craig Merkey

    April 12, 2021 at 6:01 pm

    We all know those friends and family members who understand the difference b/t compliance and conversation during communication! Relationship building versus winning!

  36. God Bear

    April 12, 2021 at 10:49 pm

    This approach isn’t always possible though if the debate is about human rights there is no middle ground. Trying to reach the middle ground on human rights led to such things as Three-Fifths compromise separate but equal and “states rights”

  37. Reena Madian

    April 13, 2021 at 11:18 am

    Whole idea gets better through challenge & criticism!!

  38. Buddy

    April 13, 2021 at 1:49 pm

    Listen, be heard, and understand…

  39. Ricardo Hernandez

    April 13, 2021 at 4:09 pm

    Isn’t this topic known as emotional inteligence? Or maybe is a combination of that and common sense? In this competitive world an enjoyable conversation seems to be labeled as a useless waste of time.

  40. alejandro andres

    April 15, 2021 at 11:50 am

    life is empty and meaningless until you see a possibility

  41. Rallon Wolfheart

    April 15, 2021 at 7:43 pm

    Sounds a bit like Street Epistemology

  42. tinkerball vg

    May 2, 2021 at 12:44 am

    I am so focused on your jaw line.

  43. Chuck Finley

    May 3, 2021 at 12:05 pm

    There is no conversation at all when the other party simply makes law with the stroke of a pen! Any chance of debate is then null and void!

  44. Aniekan Abasiekong

    May 3, 2021 at 6:39 pm

    Quite an interesting perspective to look at conversations. Curiosity over clash is a huge point.

  45. Gabrielle S

    May 3, 2021 at 7:24 pm

    I really like your openings. “I never thought about it like that before” Etc. It puts most of the responsibility on the other person, which in my case is probably good because I tend to recoil

  46. Arsalan Khan

    May 4, 2021 at 1:48 pm

    Imagine watching a video on how to communicate with your specie.

  47. MD TALKIES

    May 5, 2021 at 5:05 pm

    👍

  48. Syafira Nasution

    May 6, 2021 at 4:59 am

    I know I need thia

  49. dlanska

    May 8, 2021 at 10:26 am

    Absolutely wonderful. Thank you.

  50. Bud Stoney

    May 8, 2021 at 11:59 pm

    She’s gorgeous 😍

  51. gingnose

    May 26, 2021 at 12:17 pm

    This was a stunning speech honestly. People often overlook at this point of constructive conversation.

  52. Gautham Nanda Kishore

    June 1, 2021 at 10:43 pm

    THe USA is imperialistic. period

    • Gary Rafiq

      June 14, 2021 at 1:32 am

      And what does your comment have to do with the speech?

  53. etienne kruger

    June 2, 2021 at 8:26 am

    Someone ate a yellow lollipop before the video

  54. Герман Петров

    June 2, 2021 at 3:27 pm

    gooood

  55. G A D

    June 3, 2021 at 10:02 am

    Mandando você e todos pro inferno…. Demônios

  56. Fabián Zambrano

    June 6, 2021 at 2:57 pm

    I would like if the subtitles were in Spanish, please.

    • Gary Rafiq

      June 14, 2021 at 1:31 am

      Click on the gear icon on the lower right and then click on subtitle/CC and then click on Auto-translate which will give you a list of languages to choose from. Bear in mind that the translation may not be accurate.

  57. Cabdi casiis C raxman

    June 7, 2021 at 5:52 am

    Good

  58. Gaurav Sawant

    June 7, 2021 at 3:06 pm

    It was a very good Talk and a stimulus, prompting me to have a convo(constructive) with my Ex

  59. Riya Zawar

    June 8, 2021 at 4:48 pm

    I’ll try to keep that in mind “choose curiosity over clash” and many more things she said. It was a helpful video because my antisocial self really struggles with conversations because of some of my ideals.

  60. Srijan Varma

    June 9, 2021 at 9:44 pm

    I never thought about it exactly that way before, what can you share that will help me see what you see

  61. That Wierd Kid

    June 11, 2021 at 12:42 am

    i have tried this and it is helpful but some people omg…jus dont want to be flexible what they think is the truth and shall never be changed no matter how much u try to understand them and u eventually will u will accept it but they will in no world will accept ur ideology

    at that point i jus give up… its a waste to even debate with those ppl who put their feelings over logic

  62. eyes2eyes

    June 12, 2021 at 12:30 pm

    Simple but really valuable ted talk

  63. M. Rizkiawan Latif

    June 14, 2021 at 7:45 am

    Gorgeous woman, genius yet beautiful

  64. Tumisho

    June 15, 2021 at 5:54 pm

    Revolutionary

  65. Mohammed Ali

    June 17, 2021 at 6:18 am

    Beautiful 🥴🥀❤

  66. 中华有为

    June 17, 2021 at 1:09 pm

    不会英语,不知道在说什么

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

People & Blogs

Boston Dynamics’ Atlas Goes Hands On | TechCrunch

Watch as Boston Dynamics’ Atlas utilizes machine learning to autonomously move engine covers between supplier containers and a mobile sequencing dolly.

Published

on

Watch as Boston Dynamics’ Atlas utilizes machine learning to autonomously move engine covers between supplier containers and a mobile sequencing dolly.

Continue Reading

People & Blogs

Landbase’s AI-powered robot Ameca at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024

Why hear us talk about #TechCrunchDisrupt2024 when you could hear it from Ameca, Landbase’s AI-powered robot, in a poem?

Published

on

Why hear us talk about #TechCrunchDisrupt2024 when you could hear it from Ameca, Landbase’s AI-powered robot, in a poem?

Continue Reading

People & Blogs

Humanoid robot David shows in-hand manipulation skills | TechCrunch

Humanoid robot David from DLR’s Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics demonstrates advanced manipulation skills with a 7-DoF arm and a fully articulated 5-finger hand

Published

on

Humanoid robot David from DLR’s Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics demonstrates advanced manipulation skills with a 7-DoF arm and a fully articulated 5-finger hand

Continue Reading

Trending