Science & Technology
How carbon capture networks could help curb climate change | Bas Sudmeijer
Visit to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more. What if we could build a global waste disposal service for carbon? In this forward-thinking talk, carbon capture advisor Bas Sudmeijer proposes building CO2 networks: partnerships between cities around the world that would share the cost and geological resources…
CNET
Checking Out the Afeela Prototype
Tech reporter Abrar Al-Heeti got the chance to check out the Sony x Honda Afeela prototype at TechCrunch Disrupt. Here’s what she found inside. #techcrunchdisrupt #sonyafeela #sony #honda #cars Subscribe to CNET on YouTube: Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉 Check out CNET’s Amazon Storefront: Follow us on TikTok: Follow us…
CNET
Unboxing the PlayStation 5 Pro
We got our hands on the PlayStation 5 Pro. Let’s unbox it and compare it to the PS5 and PS5 Slim. #ps5pro #playstation5 #playstation #gaming #unboxing Subscribe to CNET on YouTube: Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉 Check out CNET’s Amazon Storefront: Follow us on TikTok: Follow us on Instagram: Follow…
CNET
A Helium-Filled Cell Tower in the Sky
We visited Sceye’s hangar in Roswell, New Mexico to learn about the company’s High Altitude Platform System (HAPS), which is designed to provide internet services to underserved communities and conduct Earth observation with partners including NASA and USGS. Read more on CNET.com: Launching Balloon-Like Infrastructure for the Stratosphere 0:00 Intro to Sceye’s HAPS 0:39 What…
Nvidia Rises, Silicon Valley Faces Election Divide | Bloomberg Technology
Donald Trump’s Potential Silicon Valley Impact
Kamala Harris’ Potential Silicon Valley Impact
-
Science & Technology4 years agoNitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
-
CNET4 years agoWays you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) 👈🏽
-
Wired5 years agoHow This Guy Became a World Champion Boomerang Thrower | WIRED
-
People & Blogs3 years agoSleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter 💤 | Tech Support | WIRED
-
Wired5 years agoNeuroscientist Explains ASMR’s Effects on the Brain & The Body | WIRED
-
Wired5 years agoWhy It’s Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik’s Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED
-
Wired5 years agoFormer FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED
-
CNET5 years agoSurface Pro 7 review: Hello, old friend 🧙
mary is Tulsafox
January 29, 2021 at 4:55 pm
You do know that if you remove carbon from the carbon cycle you create a desert just saying.
James Kulevich
January 29, 2021 at 6:07 pm
Again: humans trying to change things not realizing, over and over again, that there will be negative consequences to those actions.
Jh5578
January 29, 2021 at 10:21 pm
You know if you *add* carbon into the carbon cycle you melt glaciers, start forest fires, create water scarcity, increase the severity of storms and hurricanes… oh yeah you also create deserts. The Sahara is growing in size, look it up. The notion that carbon capture is bad only follows if you are completely ignorant to the massive co2 pollution happening across our planet.
mary is Tulsafox
January 29, 2021 at 4:57 pm
The trees are already suffocating enough as it is the more carbon We get rid of the more trees we lose the more deserts we create.
Jh5578
January 29, 2021 at 8:55 pm
😆
A N
January 29, 2021 at 9:22 pm
There won’t be trees left , if carbon capture takes off .
They will use it as an excuse to land clear .
We no longer need nature to clean up , big brother has you covered , we stick it under ground now and charge the price of doing it to you .
That forest you like to camp in , is now another farm of some sort because the land has been cleared .
The land was more beneficial as a farm and a carbon capture plant .
Chris Keating
January 29, 2021 at 5:00 pm
I did not expect my hometown of Scunthorpe to be featured in this TED Talk.
Touqeer Mostofa
January 29, 2021 at 5:10 pm
The guy’s way of talking made me feel like he’ll start crying any time… (no offense)
Psalm One
January 29, 2021 at 5:15 pm
He is an actor pretending he is VERY concerned. Great propaganda actor, they should make special awards for these…Totalitarian Awards $$$
Ya D
January 29, 2021 at 5:25 pm
í
Mutant Buzzard
January 29, 2021 at 5:31 pm
If there was a way to keep the level of atmospheric co2 from ever changing without curtailing mans use of oil would liberals do it? the fact that they won’t proves that liberals are lying hypocrites that car nothing for the climate and every thing about controlling the lives of others
True Crime Queen TV
January 29, 2021 at 5:37 pm
Super obsessed with these videos! Always watch immediately after uploading. Stay safe out there everyone😇❤️
L
January 29, 2021 at 5:44 pm
The problem with this is that is does not actually solve climate change. You still giving a reason to continue burning and emitting these greenhouse gases. The problem with environmental problems is instead of getting to the root of the problem and preventing it from happening in the first place, people like to just put a cap on it while the mess is still happening underneath. It doesn’t solve anything, it just hides it. And if this technology gets popular, I can only imagine this turning into a billion dollar company and incentivize other companies to pollute even more so that this carbon capture industry makes more money. In my opinion, this does not work. This does not actually solve climate change or the many injustices happening against people. If you want real change, we need to get to the root of the problem, decrease our emissions in the first place THEN WE WONT NEED CARBON CAPTURE. also TREES AND PLANTS DO ‘CARBON CAPTURE’. why are we relying on technology when we already have a natural system that does that job! for all of humanity and before, the ocean and trees have stored carbon but because of climate change and deforestation, the carbon that was stored in the ground and ocean are being released! bruuhh c’mon the natural environment is supposed to be doing their job but we are destroying it. we don’t need this carbon capture technology, we need our natural environment.
markd315
January 29, 2021 at 5:50 pm
Carbon capture technology is bourgeois propaganda predicated on the notion that it’s impossible to abolish the profit motive that is causing these corporations to destroy the Earth.
No thanks.
I’m on board with the irrefutable science that says we should seize the means of production, force companies to stop polluting by running them in the public interest, and solve the climate crisis by solving the capitalism crisis.
wojciech strzelecki
January 29, 2021 at 5:52 pm
Bs science at it’s finest
AMICUS CURIAE ZAIB EMRE
January 29, 2021 at 5:57 pm
Superb video, keep sharing such great information.
Rakib Hasan
January 29, 2021 at 5:58 pm
Elon Musk
James Kulevich
January 29, 2021 at 6:08 pm
Remember folks: many of the positive comments here are made by programed robots…
James Kulevich
January 29, 2021 at 6:10 pm
Again peeps: humans trying to change things not realizing, over and over again, that there will be negative consequences to those actions.
LOST131100
January 29, 2021 at 6:40 pm
Or if you live in Almaty
Kodlcan
January 29, 2021 at 7:26 pm
Man-made climate change is not a thing. It’s a scam. Do your homework.
Joan Carrio
January 29, 2021 at 8:09 pm
Great, this is a very better solution than cover the Sun.
A N
January 29, 2021 at 8:33 pm
Pure bullshit .
Anybody buying into this crap is just a stooge .
First off the ground underneath will be poisoned no matter what they tell you .
Just like the GAS industries and fracking .
SECOND “”YOU WILL PAY FOR IT “”
The price of building this sort of rubbish will be added to the price of the product .
In 2018 a company claimed it can do it for $22 euros a ton .
That is $26 US .per ton of carbon .
The average person in the US is said to be creating 16 ton per year .
That’s $ 416 a year that will be added to your bills every year .
When you buy fuel , steel , power , cars maybe even some food processors .
Bas Sudmeijer Works for BCG .
A company that looks for ways for companies to keep on going and polluting and make you the consumer pay for it .
NACAM42
January 29, 2021 at 8:35 pm
Sure, carbon capture is great. You know what’s better? Nuclear.
Robin
January 29, 2021 at 9:52 pm
Do he know about cobalt, lithium and all the others ore needed for building machines ? Their explorations is destroying biodiversity on which we depend…
“Green growth” is an illusion.
Olivier Asselin
January 29, 2021 at 9:57 pm
Would this infrastructure be in place before we need to have fossil emissions to zero? As far as I understand this simply reduces the carbon emissions from (mostly) unsustainable sources. Will it make the zero-emission transition faster or slower?
Mr. Flegget
January 29, 2021 at 10:22 pm
Sadly its not that easy to just hide away the CO2, neither is it cheap to capture it. Also its hard to predict what happens when you pump tons of CO2 gas into the rocks, potential hazards are things like earthquakes etc
GuitarZombie
January 30, 2021 at 1:42 am
carbon is not the only issue………..how long before they figure this out?
Doug Buchanan
January 30, 2021 at 3:54 am
Take the CO2 out the loop by changing plant waste into charcoal and mix it with soil. Improves soil and captures greenhouse gases by huge amounts cheaply.
T R t S D
January 30, 2021 at 4:42 am
How stupid to try and stop change man hasn’t been here that long 17 Ice Age is later dumbasses decide the temperature needs to not go where we don’t want it to go
HOT GIRLS TV
January 30, 2021 at 5:13 am
Hello guys 😀
jon dee
January 30, 2021 at 5:33 am
Really? Emissions are increasing and much of the CO2 emissions is distributed in fossil cars and central heating systems and defies capture. This presentation is lacking on how much additional energy is needed to pump CO2 into the ground. Clue it is about a 1/4 and 1/3 extra energy and that is just from a desk study.
Here’s a quicker method, a ban on new fossil cars from 2022 and start building electric or compressed air buses instead. Half the population lives in cities and need better public transport and reductions in air pollution.
attilia marcon
January 30, 2021 at 7:09 am
It is not an viable alternative. Eventually it will all fit its way to the surface….
Stuna Sawada
January 30, 2021 at 7:28 am
Nice presentation )
PAVLOVS WORLD
January 30, 2021 at 11:36 am
Nope.
Just another market for greed to make a home.
The UN
Bartłomiej Łukaszewski
January 30, 2021 at 12:34 pm
You can’t dump liquid waste to the lake or river, but you can dump any amount of gaseous waste into the atmosphere for free. This is sick. Carbon tax now!
Chwila dla Debila
January 30, 2021 at 12:37 pm
If you compress whole atmosphere to the density of water, then its only 10 meters deep. 10 meters! When you put it like this, it’s not unthinkable to believe that humans are capable of changing CO2 amounts in atmosphere, because it’s tiny.
Kyle Topfer
January 30, 2021 at 1:51 pm
5:00 “… The 4-7Gt (CO2 capture & storage) we need.”
4-7Gt? The IPCC said we needed 660Gt storage in their 2018 Reports, and already predicted we now need much more than that in their draft modelling for the 2022 Reports. Would love a clarification on what he meant here. For the record, I’m an environmental scientist studying our available tech options.
Norwood G.
January 30, 2021 at 1:54 pm
No the only cure for climate change is communism ask Greta.
ucsbgirlie18
January 30, 2021 at 3:33 pm
I’m always surprised that no one talks about the actual problem: global population growth. Why isn’t this ever seriously talked about?
Dundoril
February 1, 2021 at 11:42 am
Because
1. There are already programs in place to give people more control over their reproduction
2. Population growth is not the driver of climate change. Greenhouse gases are.
Douglas Bell
February 1, 2021 at 1:46 pm
You are right but reducing population is unresolvable. It is a bigger issue and it is the driver for climate change. A few aboriginals with camp fires, even undertaking land management burn offs didn’t cause climate change. It needed the industrial revolution, capitalism and population growth.
ucsbgirlie18
February 2, 2021 at 4:26 pm
@Dundoril True, I agree, but if we could reduce population growth, that would help cut down on emissions.
chyfields
January 30, 2021 at 3:45 pm
Like plants, people and other creatures are a natural form of carbon capture and storage.
CRAZY GAMING
January 30, 2021 at 4:04 pm
😍😍😍😍
STOCK UP! with LARRY JONES
February 1, 2021 at 6:24 pm
Thanks so much for your comments and here is my agent WhatsApp contact let him know I directed you to him he will help you make good profit in stocks and bitcoin and his work is top notch
Krown's Crypto Cave
February 1, 2021 at 6:24 pm
Thanks so much for your comments and here is my agent WhatsApp contact let him know I directed you to him he will help you make good profit in stocks and bitcoin and his work is top notch
Hardc0re Crypt0
February 1, 2021 at 6:24 pm
Thanks so much for your comments and here is my agent WhatsApp contact let him know I directed you to him he will help you make good profit in stocks and bitcoin and his work is top notch
STOCK UP! with LARRY JONES
February 1, 2021 at 6:24 pm
W.H.A.T.S.A.P.P
+.4.4.7.8.6.2.0.9.7.9.3.6
Krown's Crypto Cave
February 1, 2021 at 6:24 pm
W.H.A.T.S.A.P.P
+.4.4.7.8.6.2.0.9.7.9.3.6
Hardc0re Crypt0
February 1, 2021 at 6:24 pm
W.H.A.T.S.A.P.P
+.4.4.7.8.6.2.0.9.7.9.3.6
Hedge 3F
January 30, 2021 at 4:28 pm
Just consume LESS
BeagleBrains 1
January 30, 2021 at 5:47 pm
Carbon capture is the logical answer to climate control, weather the climate is warming or cooling. Unfortunately politicians have hijacked the issue and using it to gain control over their people. Truth is, global cooling is the real threat; capture that carbon now to help control warming, release it later when global cooling (far more invidious future threat) is occurring. Since the libtards are forcing the world to leave that life saving carbon trapped in the earth, it cannot help us in the future. Crops thrive in a warmer climate, they will die in a cold one. Seems elementary to me.
A god in the gap
January 30, 2021 at 6:00 pm
3:39 —> how the fossil fuel industry shamelesly asks for another $110B dollars each year for 20 years from taxpayers so they don’t have to pay for it themselves.
But dressed up as “green tech” so people won’t notice it.
Flying RC
January 31, 2021 at 12:04 pm
Then don’t drive, don’t heat your home and turn off the lights. Hypocrite!!
A god in the gap
January 31, 2021 at 12:25 pm
@Flying RC | Hey look, another one who got smooth talked by the spin doctors from the fossil fuel industry. 🤣
May I also point out you haven’t got the slightest inkling how I drive, how my home is heated or where the electricity to light my home comes from.
A god in the gap
January 31, 2021 at 12:29 pm
@Flying RC | Now, when you’re ready to make an actual point. I’m happy to discuss this with you. If you, however, only intend to make empty derogatory comments … expect the same in return.
Douglas Bell
February 1, 2021 at 1:07 pm
@Flying RC electric cars charged from renewable sources, hot water from the sun and LED lights from a PV and battery system!
I care about my granchildren and their future generation and hardly need to budget or forgo to do so. And if you weren’t so stuck in the past, you could also help without missing out.
D B
February 1, 2021 at 4:17 pm
@Flying RC then no pipeline, no heat, no jobs, no income and they still get $110 billion x 20yrs. This is ridiculous. Emissions contain more than CO2. Things that are poisonous and things that create acid that would be worse than anything acid rain could muster. It would be much more concentrated and extremely corrosive and in the ground, not good for anything environmental. You can’t burn carbon without having the same carbon left afterwards.
Lemniscate למניסקטה
January 30, 2021 at 7:24 pm
Why would you want to stop climate change? The world is getting greener. Who in her right mind would want to stop that?
Lemniscate למניסקטה
February 1, 2021 at 1:56 pm
@Dundoril I like that. We shouldn’t have drained the swamps cause it changed the ecosystem, just look at all that malaria we used to have but have no more! We should have preserved the ecosystems!
Dundoril
February 1, 2021 at 2:16 pm
@Lemniscate למניסקטה “We shouldn’t have drained the swamps cause it changed the ecosystem, ”
Yes it did and it produced unforseen side effects like a lot of CO2 emissions. Which are now a problem.
” at all that malaria”
Except malaria went away long after we drained the big swamps in europe…and now that i think about it…there are still a lot of swamp areas left without any malaria…almost like the correlation ist not there….
BUT YOU IGNORED THE Rest of my comment..why?
Lemniscate למניסקטה
February 1, 2021 at 3:06 pm
Let me check. No, malaria dod not go away till we drained the swamps. I mean Disengoff lost his daughter to malaria. This place was a shithole less than 100 years ago and if the price of making it livable is making the world greener by increasing the emissions, then anyone claiming otherwise is an enemy of all people living here
Dundoril
February 1, 2021 at 3:09 pm
@Lemniscate למניסקטה so you still ignore my comment. Well good day then.
Lemniscate למניסקטה
February 1, 2021 at 3:43 pm
@Dundoril sorry? You claim the swamps have nothing to do with malaria. Next you will claim sugar have nothing to do with obesity or some such.
Lucifer 777 Christenson
January 30, 2021 at 7:34 pm
South East Cornerstone Industries Inc. Invented a CO2 filter for the combustion engine. It can be expanded to coal burning power plants. Need investors to bring to market. This will create millions of jobs.
Daniel
January 31, 2021 at 7:32 pm
I looked at their page it doesn’t say much about their filter, more than a trade secret.. sounds to good to be true. I truly hope they are the real deal though
tjwoosta
January 30, 2021 at 8:20 pm
Somehow it seem like a bad idea to just bury it. What happens when there is an earthquake or something and it all releases back into the atmosphere?
Ebong Willy Bunga
February 1, 2021 at 7:30 pm
Damn! Good thought. I guess the networks will have to be resilient though. The scientists will obviously view the situation from all angles before deploying the networks. The planet needs this….. We’re running out of time. Peace!
Tomas Antanas
January 30, 2021 at 8:30 pm
Biofuel in place of coal and gas is alternative in many counries. Unfortunate that politicians have little interest in supporting such movements.
Douglas Bell
February 1, 2021 at 1:19 pm
Biofuel burns and releases carbon. We have to get to zero emissions so biofuel shouldn’t be seen as an alternative or even a stop gap. We need to move to clean renewables.
Australian Govt would like to muddy the water with coal fired energy with carbon capture and with gas generation and even some bio fuel but we are lucky the uptake of PV on houses is very high, the State governments are setting zero emission goals with strategies and private industry is taking the challenge forward. Fortesque recently announced they will build a green hydrogen steel mill in the Pilbara region and they are converting all their ore trucks and trains to run on amonia producing waste emissions of nitrogen and water. Feds still pushing for coal mines but banks wont lend for them and insurance companies wont cover them.
Tomas Antanas
February 3, 2021 at 11:17 am
@Douglas Bell agre, biofuel has zero emisions, but I’m talking more abaut short rotation plantatiom. It saves forests, replace gas and coal also on lands where plantations are growing farming activities stops.
I know that there is some carbon captured in the roots of plants and it stays there at least for plantation liftime not shorter than 21 years.
Samuel Christian
January 31, 2021 at 2:50 am
Carbon capture can be accelerated if it can be profited by businesses and it’s already been proven that companies are able to compress the carbon into diamonds , an incentive for many mining and manufacturing companies since instead of mining for diamonds, we can just make them through compressed carbon capture
Douglas Bell
February 1, 2021 at 1:36 pm
nothing for nothing. Extreme pressure and heat required to compress carbon to form a diamond. This requires a lot of energy. Energy comes from where? At the moment much comes from coal.
Samuel Christian
February 1, 2021 at 1:51 pm
@Douglas Bell maybe someday we can harness heat from burning hydrogen to create the necessary heat to turn the carbon into diamonds
Timur Timur
January 31, 2021 at 3:22 am
Video very cool i put like
Timur Timur
February 2, 2021 at 2:44 am
@Krown’s Crypto Cave No Thank you
Timur Timur
February 2, 2021 at 2:44 am
@Hardc0re Crypt0 No Thank you
MrLoobu
January 31, 2021 at 12:47 pm
The most anyone could do is move out of the cities and stop paying taxes.
MrLoobu
January 31, 2021 at 12:49 pm
WAAAAY TOOO LATE its already almost +2c, what we have to deal with now are the ever emerging consequences.
CurlyChrizz
February 1, 2021 at 12:21 am
So just give up then?
MrLoobu
January 31, 2021 at 12:53 pm
No one did anything this year and guess what, it got worse! Its not people doing this its companies and they will never stop. You want us to fight them uphill on this the same way as covid, but again its not our problem.
Alexander Grosse
January 31, 2021 at 1:25 pm
Good luck. Start now!
TED
February 1, 2021 at 12:49 am
Thanks for replying, you can send a massage to my administrator mc joe on watsap to earn in crypto stocks and ETFs+1….2…..5…..4…2….9….4….4…..8…1….4… he’s excellent at what he does, tell him I referred you to him. his passionate strategies are top notch🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💠💠💠
James McGinn
January 31, 2021 at 6:13 pm
CO2 is good. Trees breathe CO2. There is zero evidence that CO2 causes atmospheric warming. You’ve all been duped.
Dundoril
February 1, 2021 at 11:40 am
Yes zero evidence… Except the thousands of papers on the topic…
James McGinn
February 1, 2021 at 3:53 pm
@Dundoril Just like a religion.
Dundoril
February 1, 2021 at 4:10 pm
@James McGinn No because religions are not supported by thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers
James McGinn
February 1, 2021 at 4:20 pm
@Dundoril Yes they are. You are gullible.
Dundoril
February 1, 2021 at 4:39 pm
@James McGinn no they are not. You clearly have no idea about science.
Bart Roberts
January 31, 2021 at 6:18 pm
Like ethanol in the past, carbon capture is almost always greenwashing that leads to higher fossil emissions. Like the employment argument, these schemes invariably have the opposite net effect of what they advertise. Alberta uses “CCI”, technology to force otherwise unrecoverable fossil from underground by burning bitumen that otherwise would never have been extracted, to pump back into the ground and fluidize hydrocarbons for extraction. This sad sham is the last thing we really need. We need in the 119 months remaining to 2030 to curtail fossil emitting extraction and trade licenses and permits to zero. Please, please, please stop giving consideration to this form of snake oil.
TED
February 1, 2021 at 12:49 am
Write my manager regarding making millions in BTC.🇺🇸💠
TED
February 1, 2021 at 12:49 am
+1….2…..5…..4…2….9….4….4…..8…1….4..
TED
February 1, 2021 at 12:49 am
Let him know I referred you to him, he’s so good at what he does 💯✅
Shawn Berthelette
February 1, 2021 at 5:23 am
You know we live a world where everyone has there own idea of Truth but the real Truth of this world is that Jesus is real and if you confess and turn from sin at home he will acknowledge your prayer letting you know he is real and not some religion that the world has made you believe. We are now in the End Times because the world has rejected God’s law of sin and made their own laws. What greater love is there than someone who laid their life down for you.
Douglas Bell
February 1, 2021 at 1:27 pm
You keep praying mate. The rest of us will do something about trying to reduce the problems.
Shawn Berthelette
February 1, 2021 at 9:12 pm
@Douglas Bell man is not going to save these problems. Our government warlords are satanic they worship the devil they’re bringing in the Antichrist system the only thing that can save you is Jesus Christ alone there is no name given among men under heaven whereby you must be saved there is only one name and he will only answer you if you confess and forsake your sin and you do it at home not not a religion don’t go to a church God Will save you Right where you are but man ain’t saving nothing
Extra M
February 1, 2021 at 11:06 am
There can never be a zero-emission unless you shutdown all flying commercial jetliners, shipping, and other types of machinery that emits carbon particles. All these remedies from batteries, the solar, wind, and other renewables are not the clear answer “it’s all business talk”. The Earth’s ecology has been in millions of years with its own ecological changes design by the creator.
Dundoril
February 1, 2021 at 11:39 am
“Carbon particles” It’s called molecules… You clearly have no idea about science..
Douglas Bell
February 1, 2021 at 12:59 pm
Carbon capture in the form of gas is very flawed. There is no way of ensuring that it will remain where it is pumped.
Humans have been destroying carbon capture systems and releasing sinks for centuries, trees are very efficient carbon capture systems.
Wasting energy on trying to capture carbon from fossil fuel engines (including power stations) is a diversion to converting our economies to using renewable energy and producing clean steel using green hydrogen or direct electric furnaces with required carbon added to the steel when molten, removing the need to use pie-in-the-sky carbon capture.
To save an environment that will sustain humans will require carbon capture but carbon removed from the atmosphere, not carbon released from burning additional fossils.
Герман Цветков
February 1, 2021 at 4:13 pm
Гоша привет!
Герман Цветков
February 1, 2021 at 4:17 pm
И Саша тоже привет)
STOCK UP! with LARRY JONES
February 1, 2021 at 6:30 pm
W.H.A.T.S.A.P.P
+.4.4.7.8.6.2.0.9.7.9.3.6…
Krown's Crypto Cave
February 1, 2021 at 6:30 pm
W.H.A.T.S.A.P.P
+.4.4.7.8.6.2.0.9.7.9.3.6…
Hardc0re Crypt0
February 1, 2021 at 6:30 pm
W.H.A.T.S.A.P.P
+.4.4.7.8.6.2.0.9.7.9.3.6…
STOCK UP! with LARRY JONES
February 1, 2021 at 6:30 pm
Thanks so much for your comments and here is my agent WhatsApp contact let him know I directed you to him he will help you make good profit in stocks and bitcoin and his work is top notch..
Krown's Crypto Cave
February 1, 2021 at 6:30 pm
Thanks so much for your comments and here is my agent WhatsApp contact let him know I directed you to him he will help you make good profit in stocks and bitcoin and his work is top notch..
Hardc0re Crypt0
February 1, 2021 at 6:30 pm
Thanks so much for your comments and here is my agent WhatsApp contact let him know I directed you to him he will help you make good profit in stocks and bitcoin and his work is top notch..
Greatest Child
February 1, 2021 at 9:46 pm
Gravitational force in between each thing doesn’t matter small or big in size just a part of universe in network of motion in one direction eg in galaxies planets revolves around one Lord sun and lord moon balance our planet earth but sending rockets or space craft to anywhere only dis balance our planet with universe only risk to humans existence and always sharing with U. S. A. With Japan in the race of technology with fear of nuclear weapons in microwave stuck everyone to weapons and internet networks that is nothing important for matter invented by goat created divine manipulation for evolution of entire universe in fourth law of motion to next generation of new ton shared to
Isreal created from Israel is divine manipulation in shield from I. Ran to name for general to scientist died in Corona wire us to researchers bad intentions of divine manipulation worked. To sharing with one gave 40 yrs started COVID 1 to ending 19 .
If you have brain understand this but dumb one thinking about bad English 👀
Juan Rodríguez
February 1, 2021 at 11:28 pm
Why China isn’t at the network?
FriViden
February 2, 2021 at 8:33 pm
Carbon capture is expensive – and is making us more dependent on fossil fuel.
PotassiumShard
February 3, 2021 at 11:30 am
i) Can I make any money of this? If not, I’m not interested
ii) CO2 has already been debunked and shown that humanity has minimal effects on GW from CO2 emissions.
iii) I literally don’t care if it doesn’t make me any money
iV) Is it invest-able?
v) Has the yield been proven? Or has it been theorised? Or has the yield been even considered?