Bloomberg Technology
Elon Musk Will Give $1 Million a Day to Voters
Bloomberg’s Kurt Wagner details how Elon Musk is using his clout and X to support Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Musk says his pro-Trump political action committee will give away $1 million a day to random voters that sign a petition calling for free speech and the right to bear arms. ——– Like this video?…
Bloomberg Technology
Qualcomm Eyes $22 Billion Growth | Bloomberg Technology
Bloomberg’s Caroline Hyde sits down with Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon as they eye expansions that could potentially net them $22 billion. And, crypto sees political success after backing candidates with a pro-digital currency stance. Plus, SpaceX’s next missions after completing its latest Starship rocket launch. ——– “Bloomberg Technology” is our daily news program focused exclusively…
Bloomberg Technology
Garver: Could See SpaceX Mars Missions in 4-5 Years
As SpaceX successfully launches its Starship rocket for the 6th time, Lori Garver, operating adviser at Bessemer Venture Partners and former NASA Deputy Administrator, details what the triumphs could mean for Elon Musk’s space venture. She joins Caroline Hyde to discuss on “Bloomberg Technology.” ——– Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube: …
Bloomberg Technology
Strike CEO: Worst Thing Is Not Owning Enough Bitcoin
Strike CEO Jack Mallers joins to discuss the evolving role of Bitcoin under a new Trump administration. He joins Caroline Hyde to discuss on “Bloomberg Technology.” ——– Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube: Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Technology” with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow here: Get the…
Qualcomm Eyes $22 Billion Growth | Bloomberg Technology
Garver: Could See SpaceX Mars Missions in 4-5 Years
Strike CEO: Worst Thing Is Not Owning Enough Bitcoin
-
Science & Technology4 years agoNitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
-
CNET4 years agoWays you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) 👈🏽
-
Wired6 years agoHow This Guy Became a World Champion Boomerang Thrower | WIRED
-
People & Blogs3 years agoSleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter 💤 | Tech Support | WIRED
-
Wired6 years agoNeuroscientist Explains ASMR’s Effects on the Brain & The Body | WIRED
-
Wired6 years agoWhy It’s Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik’s Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED
-
Wired6 years agoFormer FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED
-
CNET5 years agoSurface Pro 7 review: Hello, old friend 🧙
@user-vh6kq5rz2q
October 21, 2024 at 4:34 pm
That’s why Elon is offering $1M because he knows he will not have to pay it because it’s not legal – so it’s an empty promise by which he is trying to galvanize the votes for Trump
@whimsicalhamster88
October 21, 2024 at 5:01 pm
I just want to hear a Trump supporter say “I’d be fine with George Soros giving out $1,000,000 checks at random to anyone that signs a petition that says Kamala Harris is smart and Trump is a felon.” Last I checked they consider him donating to universities as a covert plan to make Eastern Europeans gay or funding voting rights projects led to Trump’s many felony convictions.
@carlreinhardt5353
October 21, 2024 at 5:08 pm
We knew this would happen when Musk bought Twitter, just didn’t think it would happen this quickly and unashamedly. They don’t care if it’s illegal, it won’t matter if they win the election and if they lose they’ll simply pay a meaningless fine. This is election interference in its ugliest form, Billionaires buying politicians to pay less tax, get shielded from the law, pump up crypto prices and win government contracts.
@marielaguaita5794
October 21, 2024 at 5:10 pm
Kamala is giving $700 busing illegal immigrants to her rallies- cuz it’s her that’s legal— 😅
@Seth6097
October 21, 2024 at 5:10 pm
How is this not a bribe?..
@donjaun1423
October 21, 2024 at 8:26 pm
It’s to sign a petition. She’s misleading you! This isn’t bribing people to vote. Ever done any research?
@sugarmagnolia1475
October 21, 2024 at 5:10 pm
ITS BUYING VOTES BUT WORSE ATTACKING PRIVACY OF VOTE – TOXIC.
@b4haku
October 21, 2024 at 5:21 pm
This is what called “black propoganda”
@imatimetraveler5760
October 21, 2024 at 5:26 pm
How much is trump going to fund Elon if that’s the case 😂
@tiffanyhaines9183
October 21, 2024 at 5:29 pm
In PA: I will hold a sign for whoever pays me more! I am a gig industry worker and small business owner in need of funding!
@tayoukachukwu3105
October 21, 2024 at 5:29 pm
Ed corrects them by emphasizing that Kamala posts, from two accounts. Obama posts. Mark Cuban posts. By the way Mark recently noted that he does not think that Elon’s move is illegal and so you guys should calm down. We see posts from the right and left on X and if you engage you see more posts because the algorithm follows your interests. Unlike in the previous Twitter where they rigged the system to favor left-leaning and progressives views, while limiting (or banning) right-wing/conservative voices.
Elon says he wants all voices to be heard and not only from one side. This balance seems to make left-leaning journalists and politicians very uncomfortable and they start pushing for censorship. Quite unfortunate. Well done Ed for the balanced take and keep it up
@bhndit
October 21, 2024 at 5:46 pm
how could he be this rich 🔥🔥
@phillyfreak2499
October 21, 2024 at 5:47 pm
How about instead, we put that money towards Tesla service centers in Dallas. My car is a big brick in the driveway right now because of the over 30-day wait times!!
@kennixox262
October 21, 2024 at 8:19 pm
Next time buy a Rolls Royce! My Dawn is reliable and is not a bricked toaster with poor fit and finish as are Tesla’s and don’t like dorky.
@yodab.at1746
October 21, 2024 at 5:54 pm
Here’s the obscenity of his wealth.
10 million is 1% of a billion. Musk has hundreds of billions. His millions are worth less to him than the wages of a minimum wage Mcdonalds worker serving fries for 9 hours straight are to them. They can’t afford to give anything away. But musk will attempt to buy the electorate.
Thats obscene.
@apidas
October 21, 2024 at 6:08 pm
bro thinks he’s mr beast
@samikhalifa6021
October 21, 2024 at 6:24 pm
Democracy…lol
@patrickwagner4935
October 21, 2024 at 6:27 pm
Snowflakes ❄️ and their 😊jealous Elon is endorsing Trump
@cornelisdebilde6850
October 21, 2024 at 7:06 pm
Elon Musk expresses his eagerness to collaborate with Trump in the White House, even though Elon backs someone widely regarded as a habitual liar, criminal, felon, insurrectionist, and rapist. This raises concerns, as it also reflects poorly on Musk, suggesting he may share similar qualities. It is important to recognize that criminals tend to support one another. Musk, your reputation is at risk, stick to building cars, not politics! Trump is the greatest danger to America!
@DianeOliphant
October 21, 2024 at 7:33 pm
IT IS ILLEGAL!!
@donjaun1423
October 21, 2024 at 8:22 pm
If that’s the case then it’s illegal for George soros to give money to kackalla!
@davidbrophy3521
October 21, 2024 at 7:37 pm
Interesting that Trump appeared to promise to create something Musk wants and will reportedly “head” for a Trump government if he wins.
@michaelhayes7849
October 21, 2024 at 7:58 pm
Lock Him Up!!!
@kennixox262
October 21, 2024 at 8:18 pm
Buying votes is illegal. Deport Musk.
@wadefak
October 21, 2024 at 8:19 pm
Based on the information available up to October 19, 2024, Elon Musk’s super PAC, known as America PAC, has announced a giveaway of $1 million every day until election day to individuals in swing states who sign a petition supporting free speech and the right to bear arms. However, the legality of this action isn’t directly addressed in the provided excerpts or X posts but let’s analyze the situation based on general campaign finance laws:
1. **Campaign Finance Laws**: In the U.S., campaign finance laws are quite strict about contributions and expenditures to influence elections. However, payments for activities like petition-signing could potentially be seen as a gray area. The law prohibits paying individuals to vote or register to vote, but if the payment is framed as compensation for signing a petition (which indirectly supports a candidate), it might navigate around direct violations of those laws.
2. **Foreign Interference**: Elon Musk has mentioned on X (formerly Twitter) about illegal foreign interference in U.S. elections. While this doesn’t directly relate to the legality of the giveaway, it suggests a context where financial contributions and their influences on elections are under scrutiny. However, since Musk himself is not a foreign entity in this context, this specific concern might not apply to his PAC’s activities.
3. **Public Perception and Legal Scrutiny**: Even if technically legal, such large-scale financial incentives could attract legal scrutiny or at least public and regulatory attention to determine if they’re intended to influence voter behavior in a way that could be construed as buying votes or if they’re genuinely for advocacy unrelated to voting behavior directly.
4. **X Posts and Public Statements**: Musk’s X posts suggest an intent to mobilize support for certain constitutional rights, which might be framed as issue advocacy rather than explicit campaign support, potentially placing it in a different legal category. However, the close alignment with election timing and targeting swing states does raise questions about intent.
5. **Precedents and Legal Interpretations**: There’s no explicit mention in the provided data of a court case or legal ruling directly declaring such an action illegal. However, campaign finance law often interprets actions based on intent and effect. If the intent is to sway voters with financial incentives, even if wrapped in the guise of supporting a petition, it might tread into a legally contentious area.
Given these points, while there’s no definitive statement or legal ruling provided here that declares Elon Musk’s super PAC’s $1 million daily giveaway as explicitly illegal, the approach skates close to several legal and ethical lines in campaign finance regulations. The legality could depend on how these actions are structured, reported, and justified under current election laws, and it might require judicial review or FEC clarification to determine its lawfulness definitively. Always, such innovative campaign strategies might be legal until challenged and ruled upon by relevant authorities or courts.
@canabcalias7862
October 21, 2024 at 8:28 pm
Elon Musk should be deported back to South Africa as he is committing crime of National Secuirty!! US is the land of law and land of immigrants. Elon Musk is bribing people and Super Pac to change the election outcome! Elon Musk’s US Citizenship should be stripped away!!! USCIS and DHS should look into the immigration records of this National Security threat who, admitted that he travelled to Russia to buy refurbished ICBM to develop a rocket for SpaceX!! Conspiring against US Government’s interest and US’s interest and seeking cooperation from anti-US countries and dictator communist regimes such as USSR or Russian Federation is MORE THAN enough to take away Elon Musk’s US Citizenship and Canadian Citizenship and let him rot in South Africa!!!!
@bort_zdiot
October 21, 2024 at 8:40 pm
“Go on, take the money and run
Hoo hoo hoo”
@davecohen1884
October 21, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Can we force Elon to sell his ownership in his companies if he takes any job in our government? Our government makes certain he complies with regulations! Thus, there would be a “Conflict of Interest”. Every other employee would be forced to sell their interest, or the companies would no longer be allowed to do any business with the government.