Bloomberg Technology
Efforts to Curb US Voter Distrust
Jen Easterly, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, warns of potential threats to voting confidence. Bloomberg’s Jamie Tarabay joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow to discuss on “Bloomberg Technology. ——– Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube: Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Technology” with Caroline Hyde and Ed…
Bloomberg Technology
Nvidia Rises, Silicon Valley Faces Election Divide | Bloomberg Technology
Bloomberg’s Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow discuss the tech trades on the eve of US elections and why the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is issuing warnings ahead of election results. Plus, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris leave Silicon Valley divided. Chapters: 00:06:23 – Laffer Tengler Investments CEO Nancy Tengler 00:26:42 –…
Bloomberg Technology
Donald Trump’s Potential Silicon Valley Impact
Aloft VC founder Crystal McKellar, joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow to discuss the impact of a potential second Donald Trump term on the tech sector. She speaks on “Bloomberg Technology.” ——– Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube: Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Technology” with Caroline Hyde and Ed…
Bloomberg Technology
Kamala Harris’ Potential Silicon Valley Impact
Tech4Kamala group co-founder Shannon Nash joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow to discuss the impact of a potential Kamala Harris win on the tech sector. She speaks on “Bloomberg Technology.” ——– Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube: Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Technology” with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow…
Nvidia Rises, Silicon Valley Faces Election Divide | Bloomberg Technology
Donald Trump’s Potential Silicon Valley Impact
Kamala Harris’ Potential Silicon Valley Impact
-
Science & Technology4 years agoNitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
-
CNET4 years agoWays you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) 👈🏽
-
Wired5 years agoHow This Guy Became a World Champion Boomerang Thrower | WIRED
-
People & Blogs3 years agoSleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter 💤 | Tech Support | WIRED
-
Wired5 years agoNeuroscientist Explains ASMR’s Effects on the Brain & The Body | WIRED
-
Wired5 years agoWhy It’s Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik’s Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED
-
Wired5 years agoFormer FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED
-
CNET5 years agoSurface Pro 7 review: Hello, old friend 🧙
@TOMMYFITZCOMEDY
November 4, 2024 at 3:36 pm
shouldnt that plan include transparency and communication?
@djpseudoname2023
November 4, 2024 at 6:37 pm
It is important to remember that the President is not chosen by a national popular vote. The Electoral College vote totals determine the winner, not the statistical plurality or majority a candidate may have in the national popular vote totals. Electoral votes are awarded on the basis of the popular vote in each state.
48 out of the 50 States award Electoral votes on a winner-takes-all basis (as does the District of Columbia). For example, all 54 of California’s electoral votes go to the winner of the state election, even if the margin of victory is only 50.1 percent to 49.9 percent.
In a multi-candidate race where candidates have strong regional appeal, as in 1824, it is quite possible that a candidate who collects the most votes on a nation-wide basis will not win the electoral vote. In a two-candidate race, that is less likely to occur. But, it did occur in the Hayes/Tilden election of 1876 and the Harrison/Cleveland election of 1888 due to the statistical disparity between vote totals in individual state elections and the national vote totals. This also occurred in the 2000 presidential election, where George W. Bush received fewer popular votes than Albert Gore Jr., but received a majority of electoral votes, and the 2016 election, where Donald J. Trump received fewer popular votes than Hillary Clinton, but received a majority of electoral votes.