23 Comments

1. 

   Michael Ludden

   October 20, 2022 at 6:04 pm

   🍿

   Reply
2. 

   Michael Ludden

   October 20, 2022 at 6:26 pm

   Draymond arguing for censorship is not a good look. Especially coming from him lol

   Reply
3. 

   DThorn Vlogs

   October 20, 2022 at 6:33 pm

   Draymond on a Poole Punch Media Tour 💪🏾🤣

   Reply
   • 

     Light

     October 20, 2022 at 6:56 pm

     😂😂😂😂

     Reply
   • 

     DThorn Vlogs

     October 20, 2022 at 7:12 pm

     @Light 🤣🤣🤣 sub..scribe to my chan.nel bro 💯💯💯

     Reply
4. 

   HOBBY

   October 20, 2022 at 6:47 pm

   Punch Media Tour 👍🏼

   Reply
5. 

   James M

   October 20, 2022 at 6:51 pm

   Less is more and actions speak louder than words is something Draymond has never been told. LOL. This media tour makes him look extraordinary tone-deaf.

   Reply
6. 

   sasha

   October 20, 2022 at 7:06 pm

   Draymond still isn’t taking accountability for what he did, he went on a all conspiracy tangent about the video edit to make him look a certain way. The more he talks the more he makes Poole look good. Where is his PR team ?

   Reply
7. 

   allappleTV

   October 20, 2022 at 7:10 pm

   Keep expanding your territories, Draymond! Congratulations on the success of these new endeavors in the broadcast world! We are all flawed. We all make mistakes. I love that you don’t hide from yours. Wonderful trait, champ! Keep pressing!

   Reply
   • 

     glasses

     October 21, 2022 at 7:38 am

     I couldnt bring myself to edit out the snarkiness in my comment. You’re right we are all flawed.

     Reply
8. 

   Tweaker Newz

   October 20, 2022 at 7:11 pm

   This is Draymond last year in golden state

   Reply
9. 

   alistar92

   October 21, 2022 at 2:51 am

   He only interrested by what people say about him and not what he did!! Incredible!!!!

   Reply
10. 

    William Aaron Berry III

    October 21, 2022 at 3:25 am

    Jordan Poole committed assault on Draymond Green.
    ASSAULT

    Primary tabs

    Assault is generally defined as an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. No physical injury is required, but the actor must have intended to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the victim and the victim must have thereby been put in immediate apprehension of such a contact.

    “Intention” in the context of assault, means that the act is not accidental, but motive is immaterial.
    It does not matter if the goal of the tortfeasor was merely to scare the victim or if the act was meant as a joke.
    The tortfeasor need not have intended for the contact to be harmful or offensive, only to have intended the actual contact.
    “Reasonable apprehension” in the context of assault, refers to the victim’s reasonable belief that the act will lead to imminent harmful or offensive contact.
    The victim does not need to prove fear, only that they were aware that such a contact might occur. If the victim and the tortfeasor do not know each other, then the legal standard is what an ordinary reasonable person under the same circumstances as the victim would have believed.
    If the victim and tortfeasor have special knowledge of each other, this special knowledge may be considered when determining whether the victim’s apprehension was reasonable.
    “Imminent” in the context of assault, means the threatened harmful or offensive contact must be certain or likely to occur very soon.
    “Harmful or offensive” in the context of assault, is an objective standard referring to touching that is likely to or capable of causing harm or offending a reasonable person by violating prevailing social standards of acceptable touching.
    However, an otherwise inoffensive contact may be deemed offensive if the tortfeasor knew the victim was unusually averse to such a contact.
    There is some disagreement among jurisdictions in regard to the role of consent.

    The prima facie case for assault has three components:

    The defendant acts.
    The defendant intends to cause the victim to apprehend imminent harmful or offensive contact by the defendant.
    The defendant’s act causes the victim to reasonably apprehend such a contact.

    In tort law, assault is considered an intentional tort. Some jurisdictions label assault as attempted battery. Assault is typically paired with battery as assault and battery.

    In assault and battery, assault refers to the act that causes the victim to immediately apprehend a harmful or offensive contact, whereas battery refers to the act that causes the actual contact.

    Assault committed under aggravating circumstances may be raised to aggravated assault.

    For example:

    In Vetter v. Morgan, the Court of Appeals of Kansas held that “[the defendant’s] threat and the acts and circumstances surrounding it could reasonably put someone in [the plaintiff’s] position in apprehension of imminent or immediate bodily harm.”
    In California, under § 240 of the Penal Code, assault is “an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another.”

    [Last updated in June of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team]

    wex
    LIFE EVENTS
    accidents & injuries (tort law)
    standards of tort liability
    tort damages
    THE LEGAL PROCESS
    criminal law
    criminal procedure
    courts and procedure
    criminal law and procedure
    wex definitions

    Keywords
    tort claim
    intentional tort
    tort law
    criminal law
    tort

    Reply
    • 

      Jamila Mahdi

      October 23, 2022 at 5:13 pm

      You tripping

      Reply
11. 

    William Aaron Berry III

    October 21, 2022 at 3:25 am

    Jordan Poole committed assault on Draymond Green.
    ASSAULT

    Primary tabs

    Assault is generally defined as an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. No physical injury is required, but the actor must have intended to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the victim and the victim must have thereby been put in immediate apprehension of such a contact.

    “Intention” in the context of assault, means that the act is not accidental, but motive is immaterial.
    It does not matter if the goal of the tortfeasor was merely to scare the victim or if the act was meant as a joke.
    The tortfeasor need not have intended for the contact to be harmful or offensive, only to have intended the actual contact.
    “Reasonable apprehension” in the context of assault, refers to the victim’s reasonable belief that the act will lead to imminent harmful or offensive contact.
    The victim does not need to prove fear, only that they were aware that such a contact might occur. If the victim and the tortfeasor do not know each other, then the legal standard is what an ordinary reasonable person under the same circumstances as the victim would have believed.
    If the victim and tortfeasor have special knowledge of each other, this special knowledge may be considered when determining whether the victim’s apprehension was reasonable.
    “Imminent” in the context of assault, means the threatened harmful or offensive contact must be certain or likely to occur very soon.
    “Harmful or offensive” in the context of assault, is an objective standard referring to touching that is likely to or capable of causing harm or offending a reasonable person by violating prevailing social standards of acceptable touching.
    However, an otherwise inoffensive contact may be deemed offensive if the tortfeasor knew the victim was unusually averse to such a contact.
    There is some disagreement among jurisdictions in regard to the role of consent.

    The prima facie case for assault has three components:

    The defendant acts.
    The defendant intends to cause the victim to apprehend imminent harmful or offensive contact by the defendant.
    The defendant’s act causes the victim to reasonably apprehend such a contact.

    In tort law, assault is considered an intentional tort. Some jurisdictions label assault as attempted battery. Assault is typically paired with battery as assault and battery.

    In assault and battery, assault refers to the act that causes the victim to immediately apprehend a harmful or offensive contact, whereas battery refers to the act that causes the actual contact.

    Assault committed under aggravating circumstances may be raised to aggravated assault.

    For example:

    In Vetter v. Morgan, the Court of Appeals of Kansas held that “[the defendant’s] threat and the acts and circumstances surrounding it could reasonably put someone in [the plaintiff’s] position in apprehension of imminent or immediate bodily harm.”
    In California, under § 240 of the Penal Code, assault is “an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another.”

    [Last updated in June of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team]

    wex
    LIFE EVENTS
    accidents & injuries (tort law)
    standards of tort liability
    tort damages
    THE LEGAL PROCESS
    criminal law
    criminal procedure
    courts and procedure
    criminal law and procedure
    wex definitions

    Keywords
    tort claim
    intentional tort
    tort law
    criminal law

    Reply
12. 

    glasses

    October 21, 2022 at 7:32 am

    I appreciate how Draymond continues to genuinely apologize for the punch. No one, including Draymond, condones this action. Watching the video I honestly wondered: why no sound? What led up to the incident? He will keep moving forward (past this mistake) regardless of the “angelic” trolls who keep posturing in the comments like they are Judge Judy. GSW 2023 CHAMPS!

    Reply
13. 

    LauraDone92

    October 21, 2022 at 10:13 am

    He’s not coming back after this year, traded next summer.

    Reply
14. 

    Jacksonlrj05

    October 21, 2022 at 1:14 pm

    Draymond, how can Jordan Poole move on from your bad behavior if you continue to do a press tour talking about it? He was the victim, not you. Allow this young man and your team the time necessary to heal and please move on and be the professional you claim to be!

    Reply
15. 

    Joseph Richards

    October 21, 2022 at 5:38 pm

    The problem with every interview people will ask him why did it happen? The team is saying let’s keep it in house but he’s a media personality as well as a player he has to speak in a way that respects the fact that the team wants to keep it in house. That means Draymond can’t say he said this, I said this and he pushed me and I hit him and this is why it started. He already had these interviews scheduled so no he’s not on an apology tour it’s just timing.

    Reply
16. 

    NUNYA BIZ

    October 21, 2022 at 5:48 pm

    Draymond looked like a savage beast. bet he’s used that tactic on some ladies.

    Reply
17. 

    Darius Fountain

    October 21, 2022 at 9:39 pm

    Draymond continue to put his self n a bad situation

    Reply
18. 

    Injustice Anywhere Threatens Justice Everywhere

    October 22, 2022 at 6:21 pm

    ‘Draymond Green’s Best Hits!’

    Reply
19. 

    mecia bailey

    October 24, 2022 at 8:47 pm

    now this begs the question did Draymond camera crew leak the video????? because they had to be filming on that day?

    Reply