We don’t have to sacrifice our freedom for the sake of technological progress, says social technologist Divya Siddarth. She shares how a group of people helped retrain one of the world’s most powerful AI models on a constitution they wrote — and offers a vision of technology that aligns with the principles of democracy, rather than conflicting with them.
If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas:
Follow TED!
X:
Instagram:
Facebook:
LinkedIn:
TikTok:
The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world’s leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
Watch more:
TED’s videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: . For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at
#TED #TEDTalks #democracy
@Dude-wf1mb
March 5, 2024 at 11:11 am
This is laughable. Read Democracy: The God That Failed
@gregbors8364
March 5, 2024 at 11:12 am
Remember “Battlestar Galactica,” where the Cylons had that one human being they kept alive as a useful tool? She’s like that guy.
@mando3027
March 5, 2024 at 11:21 am
She was so annoying to listen too😐 covid solved itself btw. Herd immunity is a real thing😂 and this is dumb. All hail our ai overlords!
@redtankgirl5
March 5, 2024 at 11:22 am
What a tool. A useful tool but a tool just the same selling censorship and control of the masses through AI and ‘democracy’. Okay, right.
@Pine_01
March 5, 2024 at 11:23 am
Democracy is cringe
@TheWasthereonce
March 5, 2024 at 11:42 am
Ugh I’m tired of tech people treating others more like data than actual people. It’s dehumanizing and will formulate how AI is developed.
@triggerfingers5811
March 5, 2024 at 11:45 am
Delusional 😂
@ketchupkatsup9805
March 5, 2024 at 11:50 am
you can’t democratise plaguirism software
@Ultranoob1
March 5, 2024 at 11:51 am
Science is Not a democracy and so AI aint too.
@paulawegman3955
March 5, 2024 at 11:57 am
I felt like the talk had a lot of big pre-made sentences without developing further. If you want to make people understand why this idea could work, don’t just say what can and has and could be done, show it. Show examples, processes. If it’s confidential, is it really democratic?
@gammaraygem
March 5, 2024 at 12:25 pm
There are 4 times more psychopaths in government and CEO positions than average. (Brian Klaas interviewed 500 psychopaths) All AGI needs to do is weed out the bad apples. Surely it can learn to recognise psychopaths, as it can diagnose cancer 1000 times faster than humans. If an MRI scan can recognise a psychopath, AGI should be able to do it faster and without difficult procedures.
@SurfbyShootin
March 5, 2024 at 4:44 pm
Oy vey!
@douglasshaw1320
March 5, 2024 at 12:27 pm
Delusional
@mikeullyett
March 5, 2024 at 12:28 pm
More nonsense…
@SibylleLeon
March 5, 2024 at 12:52 pm
This is brilliant.
@nolanpaul1371
March 5, 2024 at 1:03 pm
She has great points, but I consider this the equivalent too: “hey everyone we could have a way better society if we used are capabilities for good”. Like we absolutely could but those in power don’t want that and they won’t allow AI to be used too give the populace control over our own society because the elites wouldn’t benefit from that. I appreciate her enthusiasm though. interesting talk.
@BUY_YOUTUB_VIEWS_d119
March 5, 2024 at 1:24 pm
BEAUTIFUL!
@untitled795
March 5, 2024 at 1:31 pm
I’d never trust someone that can pull a fake smile like that jesus, much less trust propaganda city TED.
@Kismet-1001Nights
March 5, 2024 at 2:10 pm
I’m not telling you to make the world better, because I don’t think that progress is necessarily part of the package. I’m just telling you to live in it. Not just to endure it, not just to suffer it, not just to pass through it, but to live in it. To look at it. To try to get the picture. To live recklessly. To take chances. To make your own work and take pride in it. To seize the moment. And if you ask me why you should bother to do that, I could tell you that the grave’s a fine and private place, but none I think do there embrace. Nor do they sing there, or write, or argue, or see the tidal bore on the Amazon, or touch their children. And that’s what there is to do and get it while you can and good luck at it.
😊
🙏🏻
@cheersmodreams691
March 5, 2024 at 2:13 pm
We can only hope and wish her voice and perspective would become a dominate force in the future of AI and Technology. But our education system here in America does not create a citizenry with an understanding of truth and moral democratic behaviours. Instead technology, and soon AI, through the proliferation of social media platforms, has created a citizenry of doubters and misbelievers who would not recognize a fact or statement of truth if they bit them in the ‘you know where’. One only needs to look at our politicians, who were raised in our education system, and their disdain for truth and democracy simply because it gives them their political power.
@janosik150
March 5, 2024 at 2:20 pm
AI is a serious danger to humanity implemented into military..AI will also cause humans more unintelligent then ever before
@user-no5hf9lm1d
March 5, 2024 at 2:30 pm
Robot rulers…? No, f-in” thank you. I want AI to have absolutely nothing to do with our human governance process. Use it to spy on people, fine. Use it to fight wars, fine. Use it to help tell me what’s OK and what isn’t, no f-in’ thank you. Terrible idea, be more original.
@concernedcitizen7385
March 5, 2024 at 2:39 pm
Translation:
AI can be used to bolster the busted and broken dystopia that ‘democracy’ offers.
@user-bb7zv9ut8q
March 5, 2024 at 5:25 pm
Говно это новый шоколад. Ну как всегда, а чего вы ещё придумать можете.
@paperspeaksco
March 5, 2024 at 5:25 pm
“collective intelligence” is just the spin doctor version of saying “acquisition without attribution or compensation” or simply put – knowledge theft.
@SurfbyShootin
March 5, 2024 at 8:04 pm
Sounds like a trustfund baby who wrote a acript using ChatGPT
@hirotom2679
March 5, 2024 at 8:50 pm
For Super Earth!
@St8Genesis
March 5, 2024 at 9:28 pm
These Ted talks are so crap now, I remember when they were actually good
@einjix
March 5, 2024 at 9:43 pm
Might as well let A.I live our lives too so we can just do nothing forever and act like herd following the lines
@edgepixel8467
March 5, 2024 at 10:47 pm
If fixing “democracy” doesn’t include the Military-Industrial-Complex, we’re fucked.
@adriansinclair5323
March 6, 2024 at 1:11 am
Look at cardano and CIP 1694 – An On-Chain Decentralized Governance Mechanism
@shadowed366
March 6, 2024 at 7:44 am
Ah yes managed democracy
@andycordy5190
March 6, 2024 at 7:53 am
Many of us do not fear AI for its own sake. I would happily trust this woman with the future of AI because she has a humanistic outlook. The difficulty as I see it is that to a geat many people the subject of liberal values, equality, community, collective ownership, democracy and constitution are trigger points for reactionary behaviours and the implementation of restrictive powers.
The vision here is admirable. I’d love to see it happen but Taiwan is not the USA.
@RASDKB
March 6, 2024 at 8:53 am
If you want to switch from one system to another you‘ve got to convince those who profiteer from the system itself you wanna move away from.
@schwalmy8227
March 6, 2024 at 9:01 am
As long as it doesn’t pave the way for the ultimate managed democracy
@LexingtonAR
March 6, 2024 at 11:15 am
How bout some Liber-TEA
@ribbrascal1065
March 7, 2024 at 11:12 pm
Of course a woman.
@zyberronin731
March 9, 2024 at 10:56 am
Real Democracy never exist as a 1st point, and as a software engineer, this is the most $tup1d thing I have listen about AI topics, software is manageable by their creators and they can handle it as they want, so what does it means? That AI can be guided through any agenda or company that can afford they “payment”, otherwise any software is perfect, all of them have vulnerabilitys, in other words, can be hackable. It’s a shame how technology can help a very few percentage to progress and to evolve with a good and safe use, but the most part are like this girl, depends completely blinded by technology make us year by year more useless and noncritical people, at the point that people lost any ability to do anything by their own achievements, for their dependence to any technology.
Example: Google AI
@zyberronin731
March 9, 2024 at 11:13 am
😮😢😂😂😂 Wow for real this girl have some studies?
or maybe that is the result of our current education, that’s what their are teaching nowadays? We are lost with this future “professionals” and their way to see the world or their proposals
@Khatrihubs
March 10, 2024 at 3:54 am
It is real thing❤