Connect with us

TechCrunch

Unfolding the Samsung Galaxy Fold

After months of teasers and speculation, Samsung’s foldable is finally here. But can the fold live up to the hype — and the $2,000 price tag?

Published

on

After months of teasers and speculation, Samsung’s foldable is finally here. But can the fold live up to the hype — and the $2,000 price tag?

Continue Reading
Advertisement
17 Comments

17 Comments

  1. New Runrocks26

    April 16, 2019 at 6:40 pm

    But no one can afford this

    • Adam Kelemen

      April 16, 2019 at 6:46 pm

      I can

    • New Runrocks26

      April 16, 2019 at 7:01 pm

      Adam Kelemen I can’t ??

    • 11I1I11I

      April 16, 2019 at 7:32 pm

      Adam Kelemen prove it liar

    • Adam Kelemen

      April 16, 2019 at 9:56 pm

      I can’tttttTtTtTtttttttTtT

  2. 11I1I11I

    April 16, 2019 at 7:33 pm

    What’s with the weird glare throughout?

  3. TF Shaw

    April 16, 2019 at 7:37 pm

    Seems pointless to me.

  4. prathi sahrudh

    April 16, 2019 at 8:17 pm

    Why the tech crunch logo everything was said by the Samsung guy ???

  5. Spencer Koss

    April 16, 2019 at 8:17 pm

    It’s a cool design but they should have focused on the front screens design. It kinda makes the normal use of a phone kind of a knock off. The Huawei mate x design is much more sleek I must add. However I do love the technological advancements and I am happy to see more of these designs in the future

  6. trahim2

    April 16, 2019 at 8:48 pm

    Why the heck did you use that lens/filter?! Giving a very wrong impression of the screen’s color reproduction

  7. Dr. Jamie Pleasant; Ph.D.

    April 16, 2019 at 11:56 pm

    Am I the only one that can the crease in the middle of the unfolded screen? LOL

  8. Nick Pera

    April 17, 2019 at 4:49 am

    Junk, maybe by the third generation.

  9. Paul Coman

    April 17, 2019 at 8:59 am

    TechCrunch, is your video team composed of toddlers on crack?

  10. Ivan Boytsov

    April 17, 2019 at 1:38 pm

    So slow, they should put more powerful tech in it

  11. Topaz Blahblah

    April 17, 2019 at 2:34 pm

    Why does this guy end every sentence like it’s a question?

    • RoCk-N-PaRtY

      April 20, 2019 at 9:51 am

      Topaz Blahblah ???

  12. Tesco Primark

    April 17, 2019 at 5:00 pm

    Why did you use the broken one ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Science & Technology

Don’t Give VCs More Leverage Than You Have To

Investors know when a founder is desperate. Sasha Orloff has raised a collective $1 billion in his career and he shares his advice for staying on top of your financial situation. Listen to the full episode of Build Mode with Puzzle’s founder and CEO:

Published

on

Investors know when a founder is desperate. Sasha Orloff has raised a collective $1 billion in his career and he shares his advice for staying on top of your financial situation.

Listen to the full episode of Build Mode with Puzzle’s founder and CEO:

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

The Singularity Isn’t the Real Reason Stripe Paid $7.5B for OpenRouter

Stripe claims “the singularity” is here, and justifies its $7.5B acquisition of OpenRouter. The truth, as the Equity podcast crew highlights, is much more practical, as unglamorous as token expense management may seem:

Published

on

Stripe claims “the singularity” is here, and justifies its $7.5B acquisition of OpenRouter.

The truth, as the Equity podcast crew highlights, is much more practical, as unglamorous as token expense management may seem:

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Why is the DOJ investigating Andreessen Horowitz over board seats? | Equity Podcast

Andreessen Horowitz has two partners sitting on the boards of companies that now compete with each other: Ben Horowitz at Databricks and Martin Casado at Fivetran. Nothing too scandalous on the surface, except ⁠the Department of Justice has reportedly been investigating the arrangement ⁠for almost a year, dusting off a 112-year-old antitrust law that’s rarely…

Published

on

Andreessen Horowitz has two partners sitting on the boards of companies that now compete with each other: Ben Horowitz at Databricks and Martin Casado at Fivetran. Nothing too scandalous on the surface, except ⁠the Department of Justice has reportedly been investigating the arrangement ⁠for almost a year, dusting off a 112-year-old antitrust law that’s rarely used against VCs. 

Board conflicts aren’t exactly new, and these companies weren’t necessarily direct competitors when a16z first invested in them. But as portfolio companies expand into each other’s markets, the DOJ’s scrutiny raises a much bigger question for venture firms: How do you manage board seats when the boundaries between your portfolio companies keep moving? 
 
On this episode of TechCrunch’s⁠ Equity⁠ podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Anthony Ha, and Sean O’Kane dig into the a16z probe, what it could mean for VCs, and more of the week’s headlines. 

Subscribe to Equity on ⁠YouTube⁠,⁠ Apple Podcasts⁠,⁠ Overcast⁠,⁠ Spotify⁠ and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on⁠ X⁠ and⁠ Threads⁠, at @EquityPod. 
 
Chapters: 
 
00:00 Intro 
1:02 TechCrunch Disrupt and the Startup Battlefield 200 
3:17 The DOJ is investigating a16z over board seats 
14:47 Why Stripe just paid $7.5B for “the Stripe for AI” 
18:18 The mid-tier AI scramble: gateways, pivots, and acquihires 
23:17 Anthropic’s revenue surges while OpenAI’s losses deepen 
27:08 Also raises $150M and drops the “micro mobility” label 
32:30 Uber teams up with Zipline for drone delivery 
37:19 Wispr hits a $2B valuation 
38:26 Outro

Continue Reading

Trending