Bloomberg Technology
Silicon Data Raises $30.5M to Benchmark AI Compute
Silicon Data has raised $30.5 million to expand its pricing and performance benchmarks for the rapidly growing AI compute market. CEO Carmen Li joins Bloomberg to discuss the company’s ambition to become an “independent referee” for compute, CME’s planned GPU futures tied to Silicon Data benchmarks, and what its data says about the value and…
Bloomberg Technology
Nvidia Nears $14 Billion Hugging Face Deal | Bloomberg Tech 09/02/2026
Bloomberg’s Ed Ludlow breaks down Nvidia’s advanced talks to acquire AI startup Hugging Face in a $14 billion deal. Plus, Dell shares jump after the company boosted its annual sales forecast by $25 billion due to surging demand for servers to run AI tasks. And, Uber cuts 10% of its staff globally to streamline its…
Bloomberg Technology
Nvidia In Advanced Talks for Hugging Face
Nvidia could be closing in on its biggest AI acquisition yet, according to sources. The chipmaker is in advanced talks to buy Hugging Face in a deal that could be worth about $14 billion. Bloomberg’s Ian King and Rachel Metz join Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech” to discuss their reporting. ——– Like this video? Subscribe…
Bloomberg Technology
Expect to See a Lot More Humanoid Robots Soon: Barclays
Humanoid robots are moving out of the lab and into the real world, with deployments expected to surge in the years ahead. Zornitsa Todorova, head of Thematic FICC Research at Barclays, says the industry is entering a major scale-up phase, but a shortage of real-world training data remains a key hurdle. She joins Ed Ludlow…
Can $5000 Worth of Tech Make You Better at Tennis? | STAT
Nvidia Nears $14 Billion Hugging Face Deal | Bloomberg Tech 09/02/2026
Nvidia In Advanced Talks for Hugging Face
-
Science & Technology6 years agoNitya Subramanian: Products and Protocol
-
People & Blogs5 years agoSleep Expert Answers Questions From Twitter ???? | Tech Support | WIRED
-
CNET6 years agoWays you can help Black Lives Matter movement (links, orgs, and more) ????????
-
Wired7 years agoHow This Guy Became a World Champion Boomerang Thrower | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoNeuroscientist Explains ASMR’s Effects on the Brain & The Body | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoWhy It’s Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik’s Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED
-
Wired7 years agoFormer FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED
-
CNET7 years agoSurface Pro 7 review: Hello, old friend ????
@yomajo
August 12, 2026 at 4:53 pm
Would
@ausmiku
August 12, 2026 at 6:54 pm
Do your research. AI can’t verify itself. It has no logic or deduction capability, it can’t “do” maths, it’s not trusted in law or medicine, and it can hallucinate. AI added glue to a pizza recipe, it said people should eat rocks for minerals and vitamins, it didn’t know how many letters “r” were in “strawberry”. LOL. The fanboys and influencers are being played by the fraudulent AI companies. AI is the biggest scam in history.
@1NISU
August 12, 2026 at 9:24 pm
What we are witnessing is not just an isolated controversy; it signals systemic risk at the leadership level. When people in power openly normalize or defend racially charged rhetoric, it shows a deeper erosion of the standards that support social stability and international trust.
This issue is not about one statement or one individual. It is about the return of identity-based hierarchies that divide societies, weaken governance, and create long-term geopolitical tension. History has shown that when such narratives go unchallenged, they change from rhetoric into policy distortions, economic exclusion, and social unrest.
For global leaders and decision-makers, the priority must be to contain and correct issues at the structural level. This requires holding public officials accountable, strengthening international norms around responsible leadership, and integrating reputation-risk monitoring systems into political and institutional frameworks.
In our interconnected world, reputational damage does not stay local; it affects the global stage, impacting investment climates, diplomatic relations, and institutional credibility. The cost of inaction is not just theoretical; it is seen in instability, capital flight, and weakened alliances.
The strategic objective is clear: we must reassert standards of leadership that promote stability, credibility, and long-term global unity. before these isolated signals develop into systemic fractures.