Connect with us

NASA Is Helping Build a Humanoid Robot

Apptronik is getting ready to reveal the general-purpose robot called Apollo it’s building with NASA. Subscribe to CNET: Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension ???? Follow us on TikTok: Follow us on Instagram: Follow us on Twitter: Like us on Facebook:

Published

on

Apptronik is getting ready to reveal the general-purpose robot called Apollo it’s building with NASA.

Subscribe to CNET:
Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension ????
Follow us on TikTok:
Follow us on Instagram:
Follow us on Twitter:
Like us on Facebook:

Continue Reading
Advertisement
52 Comments

52 Comments

  1. Jameel

    February 5, 2023 at 4:37 pm

    Wow, if this was done in 4 months than Tesla’s Optimus robot looks like crap.

    Loving all the innovation in the humanoid robotics world lately. But they need to price this at around $10,000 to make it for a while for the masses.

  2. Jameel

    February 5, 2023 at 4:38 pm

    Are they going to add GPT3 / GPT4 or some other LLM into the robot?

  3. 1owaman

    February 5, 2023 at 5:05 pm

    it’s crazy how far ahead boston dynamics are in this field

    • Ken

      February 5, 2023 at 7:37 pm

      I would disagree to that opinion, because Boston Dynamics Atlas robots work with hydraulics, which seems to be more agile at the moment, but it is also more error prone, because the system has very often hydraulics failures, ending in fatal crashes of the robots.
      A system build on electric motors is much more reliable.
      Also Atlas is a “dumb robot” which is preprogrammed and which is NOT capable of doing tasks on his own decisions, although Boston Dynmamics are working on robots since founded in 1992. Their software is not even close to Teslas humanoid Robot Optimus which is still in alpha development status and which is using the same software platform as their Full Self Driving Tesla vehicles. Coprrect recognition of the surrounding and navigation through that obstacles and objects and successfully manipulating objects in such areas is a very hard task for each robot manufacturing company. Time will show who is more succesfull. Probably in a few years we will be able to compare them better.

  4. TheVRSwordsman

    February 5, 2023 at 5:13 pm

    2:50 they used a valve index to control the robot lol. Now the only people that can use it are gamers with taste.

  5. MrSidney9

    February 5, 2023 at 5:21 pm

    Boston Dynamics is way ahead.

  6. Follower of Pooh (tsm1989)

    February 5, 2023 at 5:50 pm

    LOL at NASA. Tesla already got beat ’em with their spandex robot, and that thing can dance.

  7. Neal MacDonald

    February 5, 2023 at 5:52 pm

    Still haven’t matched human gait yet though

  8. Neal MacDonald

    February 5, 2023 at 5:54 pm

    Legs are like stepping in place but not heel and toe walking, or marching

  9. Cenk Acar

    February 5, 2023 at 6:06 pm

    i wanna see the Westworld become true soon

  10. ZabaTV

    February 5, 2023 at 6:40 pm

    I’ve seen the ARTEMIS robots in person down at NASA’s Houston center. That thing is way more versatile than this.

  11. Ken

    February 5, 2023 at 7:23 pm

    Under a hundred thousand US Dollars !?
    Then again, only the rich people will be able to buy one.
    Tesla Optimus hopefully will be much cheaper as Elon Musk said.
    Time will tell who is going to be more affordable and which robot is more capable of doing tasks in households, factories, restaurants, etc.

  12. Tazmanian Darcy

    February 5, 2023 at 7:27 pm

    Ah yes….money well spent because of course humanity needs this! OR maybe money can be spent on more important world problems.

    • Hail and Fire

      February 6, 2023 at 1:22 am

      It does need this.

  13. Lhume

    February 5, 2023 at 7:48 pm

    why is the robot using vans?

  14. Multiverse Ninja

    February 5, 2023 at 8:19 pm

    Hack to eliminate human ????????

  15. rickp

    February 5, 2023 at 8:30 pm

    When are you all going to review the Clarisys Audio Panel Loudspeakers ?

  16. George Wolf III

    February 5, 2023 at 8:44 pm

    I can’t wait til they build a robot that can pick me up and carry me around!

  17. Mo A

    February 5, 2023 at 9:17 pm

    That depends on the price of the robot and the manufacturing of the robot for people at home or a care centre, robot has to be robust in dynamic mobility and encounter every obstacle on the floor from lego to medication to cups or dishes dropped at home, the robot also needs to understand commands and also the joke here is Moores Laws, other than that the robot needs to figure out solutions to a problem and have the ability to go around it or cut through it or in computing term bypassing.

  18. milliamp

    February 5, 2023 at 9:27 pm

    Waste of time and money

    • Hail and Fire

      February 6, 2023 at 1:22 am

      Just like home computers and horseless carriages. Waste of time.

  19. Navjeet Paul

    February 5, 2023 at 9:40 pm

    Astrobot – a general purpose robot Astronaut.

  20. Ausf

    February 5, 2023 at 10:03 pm

    “Dynamic walking is walking dynamically.” That’s the kind of intellect that makes you CEO.

  21. Sparkling Water

    February 5, 2023 at 10:27 pm

    Problem is….ppl will lose jobs etc.

  22. Mikhail Bulgakov

    February 5, 2023 at 10:52 pm

    Forget about Tesla Optimus. It can barely walk. Agility Robotics can run and grab boxes. It is less bulky than Boston Dynamic humanoid robots. It is a winner.

  23. Bernard Dunn

    February 5, 2023 at 10:58 pm

    Can anyone say “Skynet”? I knew you could.

  24. Just call me Brian

    February 5, 2023 at 11:18 pm

    I believe Boston Dynamic is wayyy ahead in this department.

  25. Clark Mills

    February 5, 2023 at 11:24 pm

    The more the merrier. The greater the exposure to developers and end users the faster this field matures. We’ll need one as we age into decrepitude.

    • kraenk12

      February 6, 2023 at 4:08 pm

      Fitting an evil AI would say that. Nice try

    • on telle_grám@ CNET88

      February 6, 2023 at 5:50 pm

      Thanks drop ????????????me a message on the Telegram user name above I selected among my winners this week..

    • on telle_grám@ CNET88

      February 6, 2023 at 5:50 pm

      @Ольга Королева Thanks drop ????????????me a message on the Telegram user name above I selected among my winners this week..

  26. Ольга Королева

    February 6, 2023 at 2:30 am

    This robot has no consciousness, it does not perform psychological work, it has no sense organs, it is not a subject. If he is carried into outer space, he will not even realize it, because there is nothing..

  27. Bob Hope

    February 6, 2023 at 2:59 am

    I don’t like the CEO. Won’t get far with that weighing them down.

  28. Amir Moradi

    February 6, 2023 at 3:12 am

    Ok, is it just me or is the CEO of that company a look alike of the drummer from Mastodon?

  29. Jessica Rachael Chagnon

    February 6, 2023 at 4:53 am

    I want a Westworld park where I can hang out with robots

    • BobPagani

      February 6, 2023 at 10:36 am

      “hang out”

  30. OMNI INFINITY

    February 6, 2023 at 5:29 am

    I think I am tired of furball jews on jewish media

  31. TelscombeTerror

    February 6, 2023 at 9:11 am

    Thought I was watching a Boston dynamics video from 10 years ago !

  32. Daniel Gilder

    February 6, 2023 at 9:40 am

    Well guys , with all this AI and Robot tech around it seems like we aren’t far from seeing Skynet

  33. BobPagani

    February 6, 2023 at 10:36 am

    Even at this early stage this robot makes that POS Musk unvelied last year look like a spastic marionette.

  34. Leroi LaPue

    February 6, 2023 at 10:54 am

    You mean NASA actualy builds things instead of just being a tax fraud front for black budget programs? Pfft…show us the REAL projects they are working on!

  35. dePlant

    February 6, 2023 at 3:05 pm

    Makes Elon’s dumb robot look dumb.

  36. Alric Samuel Godfrey

    February 6, 2023 at 3:53 pm

    $100,000 sure is affordable. People must be growing money on trees these days.

  37. Mercy Vector

    February 6, 2023 at 5:39 pm

    Give it to me

  38. Matt B

    February 6, 2023 at 5:44 pm

    I think Boston dynamics is making a lot more progress than this group.

  39. Frank Castle

    February 6, 2023 at 7:02 pm

    This is not good not good at all artificial intelligence is very dangerous at these levels wake up people wake up!!!!!

  40. FEED YOUR HEAD ????????

    February 6, 2023 at 8:43 pm

    Is it possible to make a robot that doesn’t look creepy

    • MelloCello

      February 6, 2023 at 11:21 pm

      Asimo

  41. Z

    February 6, 2023 at 9:50 pm

    Great News,go and build more humanoid robot

  42. Mr Kx

    February 6, 2023 at 10:39 pm

    Did they give it butt implants too?

  43. Mr,Spook

    February 6, 2023 at 11:16 pm

    Well I’m still more impressed with Tesla since they have more experience with cars and not much smaller things and optimus is also an AI platform It had to learn how to walk and they didn’t get NASA to help them.

  44. Ashraf AlamEldin

    February 6, 2023 at 11:20 pm

    Boston dynamics is on another level

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bloomberg Technology

Exploring AI Investment Opportunities Beyond Mega-Cap Tech Giants

Lori Keith, Parnassus Investments portfolio manager and senior analyst, says megacaps are not the only way to play the AI boom. She shares where she sees opportunities in mid-caps — from the companies powering the buildout to those using AI to boost productivity. She joins Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.” ——– Like this video? Subscribe…

Published

on

Lori Keith, Parnassus Investments portfolio manager and senior analyst, says megacaps are not the only way to play the AI boom. She shares where she sees opportunities in mid-caps — from the companies powering the buildout to those using AI to boost productivity. She joins Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.”
——–
Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube:

 
Watch the latest full episodes of “Bloomberg Technology” with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow here:

 
Get the latest in tech from Silicon Valley and around the world here:

Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
 
Follow Ed Ludlow on X here:
Follow Caroline Hyde on X here:
 
Listen to the daily Bloomberg Technology podcast here:

 
More from Bloomberg Business
Connect with us on…
X:
Facebook:
Instagram:
LinkedIn:
TikTok:

Continue Reading

People & Blogs

Your watch might be your new doctor’s assistant #TEDTalks

Genome researcher Michael Snyder believes health wearables, such as smart watches and glucose monitors, can transform medicine, shifting from reactive to predictive. (In fact, he’s such a big fan of these devices that he wears eight of them every single day.) From spotting an illness days before symptoms appear to helping prevent the onset of…

Published

on

Genome researcher Michael Snyder believes health wearables, such as smart watches and glucose monitors, can transform medicine, shifting from reactive to predictive. (In fact, he’s such a big fan of these devices that he wears eight of them every single day.) From spotting an illness days before symptoms appear to helping prevent the onset of diabetes, learn why the future of health care may be on your wrist.

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

The VC Backing the American Dream with Manan Mehta, Unshackled Ventures

Immigrant founders have built some of the world’s most valuable companies, but many still face barriers that make it harder to get a startup off the ground. Visa restrictions, limited access to friends-and-family capital, shallow networks, and a venture industry built around pattern matching can keep promising founders from getting funded before they have a…

Published

on

Immigrant founders have built some of the world’s most valuable companies, but many still face barriers that make it harder to get a startup off the ground. Visa restrictions, limited access to friends-and-family capital, shallow networks, and a venture industry built around pattern matching can keep promising founders from getting funded before they have a chance to prove themselves.

In this episode of Build Mode () , host Isabelle Johannesen sits down with Manan Mehta, co-founder and managing partner of Unshackled Ventures, () to talk about why he believes immigrant founders represent one of venture capital’s biggest overlooked opportunities. Manan breaks down how Unshackled built an investment model designed to help founders navigate immigration barriers, why traditional VC pattern matching causes investors to miss potential outliers, and how his team evaluates founders at day zero—often before they have a product, customers, or traction. He also explains why the structural gaps that make some founders harder to fund may be exactly where investors should be looking for outsized returns.

They get into:

The four structural barriers immigrant founders face when starting companies in the U.S.

How Unshackled Ventures helps founders navigate visas while building their startups

Why VC’s reliance on pattern matching can cause investors to miss outlier founders

How Manan evaluates founders before they have a product, customers, or traction

The IQ, AQ, EQ, and SQ framework Unshackled uses to evaluate founder potential

Why resilience, lived experience, and a founder’s relationship to the problem can matter more than a polished pitch

Why structural gaps can create some of the biggest opportunities for investors

How founders without traditional networks can find alternative paths to early capital

Why founders should understand their personal “why” instead of trying to fit the traditional VC mold

Subscribe to Build Mode on Apple Podcasts () , Spotify () , or wherever you like to listen () . And watch the full videos on YouTube () . New episodes of Build Mode () drop every Thursday.

Chapters:

00:00 – Why VCs Miss Outlier Founders

01:45 – Why Manan Mehta Founded Unshackled Ventures

04:15 – The Problem With VC Pattern Matching

06:15 – The Friends-and-Family Gap for Immigrant Founders

08:18 – How Unshackled Helps Founders Navigate Visas

10:40 – Building a Startup in Today’s Immigration Environment

12:19 – Solving One of Unshackled’s Hardest Immigration Cases

14:39 – What the U.S. Stands to Lose16:59 – Raising Unshackled’s First Venture Funds

19:40 – Can You Start a Company on an H-1B Visa?

22:13 – How to Evaluate a Founder at Day Zero

28:30 – Measuring IQ, AQ, EQ, and SQ

30:26 – How Fear Drives VC Pattern Matching

33:01 – Why Structural Gaps Create Outlier Opportunities

35:14 – Finding Startup Capital Outside Traditional VC

38:09 – Why Founders Need to Understand Their “Why”

Hosted by Isabelle Johannesen. Produced and edited by Maggie Nye. Audience development led by Morgan Little. Special thanks to the Foundry and Cheddar video teams.

Continue Reading

Trending